jump to navigation

The War Effort 12 September 2007

Posted by marisacat in 2008 Election, DC Politics, Democrats, Inconvenient Voice of the Voter, Iran, Iraq War, The Battle for New Orleans, WAR!.
trackback

  Bush in Iraq at al Asad airbase, photo AFP from Al Ahram

I took a little walk around Black Commentator (publishes Thursday) and Black Agenda Report (publishes Wednesday)…

Lead article at BC (I hate to link to them as everything goes behind the sub wall after a single week, but here goes):

ElBaradei told the New York Times, “This is the first time Iran is ready to discuss all the outstanding issues which triggered the crisis in confidence.” However, the U.S. State Department is planning a full court press for a third resolution in the Security Council, against Iran. 

Sound familiar? How about the lead up to the invasion of Iraq, which was quickly launched when Baghdad announced its intention to allow UN inspectors in to search for nuclear weapons that the Administration said existed and which we now know didn’t? 

History sometimes repeats it self as a farce; in this case it threatens a planetary catastrophe. 

“World peace is at risk,” said ElBaradei, because of “new crazies who say, ‘let’s go and bomb Iran.’” 

A bit more:

It isn’t the first time the Bush administration has fumed over ElBaradei’s actions,” wrote Thomas Omestad in U.S. News and World Report Sept. 7th. “Before the Iraq war, he concluded that he had no evidence to back the U.S. claim that Iraq had reconstituted its nuclear weapons program. (ElBaradei’s conclusion was subsequently borne out by postwar investigation.) The administration initially opposed his renomination as director general of the IAEA, then relented.” 

[Eli] Lake wrote in the Sun, “a Bush administration official, who asked to remain anonymous, said the IAEA was in danger of losing its status of being an honest broker in the Iran nuclear standoff. ‘We have committed to the diplomatic route for four years now,’ the official said. ‘The last thing we need is for the director of the IAEA himself to start shielding Iran from diplomatic penalties.’” 

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

BC also has up a piece from Zogby, a poll sponsored by 911Truth.org:

As America reaches the sixth anniversary of the world-churning events of September 11, 2001, a new Zogby International poll finds a majority of Americans still await a Congressional investigation of President Bush and Vice President Cheney’s actions before, during and after the 9/11 attacks. Over 30% also believe Bush and/or Cheney should immediately be impeached by the House of Representatives. 

The 911truth.org–sponsored poll also found that over two-thirds of Americans say the 9/11 Commission should have investigated the still unexplained collapse of the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 at 5:20 p.m. on September 11, 2001.  

WTC 7 housed the mayor’s emergency bunker and offices of the SEC, IRS, CIA and Secret Service and was not hit by any planes but still completely collapsed into its own footprint nearly eight hours after the Twin Tower attacks. FEMA did not explain this collapse, the 911 Commission ignored it, and the promised official study by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is now 2 years overdue.

Words like Oswald, Ruby, Sirhan Sirhan, the “naming of the names”, roll call of the dead and the ‘’shooters”, come to mind.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Last, David Swanson has an odd reverie.  I understand, at a great distance, where he is coming from. but Gee! does anyone think this is workable…  The whole thing strikes me as woefully misplaced.

A top priority for progressives, regarding next year’s presidential election, should be convincing Barack Obama and John Edwards to join forces as a ticket and defeat Hillary Clinton.   

Were one of them to drop out, the other would easily take first place in the polls.  But neither of them is likely to drop out.  As a result, unless they join forces, we will face a choice between a pro-war, pro-corporate Republican and the pro-war, pro-corporate Hillary Clinton.  Jeff Cohen recently laid out the case against Clinton.

Together, Obama and Edwards could announce their candidacy as a ticket today, take the lead in the polling tomorrow, and keep it through the primaries.  They would also stand a much better chance of defeating a Republican in the general election than would Clinton.  She is the designated loser, and what’s frightening (and motivating) is the thought of how awful our future would be even if she were to win.  This is a case that ought to be clear to a wide range of progressives.  Even if you’re committed to backing whoever the Democratic nominee is, as a progressive you have an interest in making sure it is not Hillary Clinton.  And even if you’re fed up with the entire Democratic Party, you can recognize the danger of Clinton becoming the nominee. 

Frankly, I just tore my hair out reading it.

********************************************

Seems that Margaret Kimberley, at BAR, is the counterpoint to David Swanson:

Not only is November 2008 too late to stop atrocities in the making, but it is clear that even if they are successful, the Democrats will do nothing to turn back the Bush tide. Will they undo the Patriot Act, violations of FISA rules that allowed spying on Americans, or the Military Commissions Act? Will they rebuild New Orleans or empty the jails of non-violent offenders? Recent history proves that they will not. Once the second Clinton presidency is it hand, we will be told to shut up and sit down. We will be told to rejoice that a Democrat is appointing federal judges, and ignore the fact that Guantanamo still holds political prisoners known as enemy combatants.

“Once the second Clinton presidency is it hand, we will be told to shut up and sit down.”

Every major change that took place in the United States came about because of popular demands. However, the odds of successfully mobilizing 21st century Americans are not good. As Chris Floyd writes in Empire Burlesque:

Dissidents will be marginalized – usually by “the people” themselves. Deprived of historical knowledge by an impoverished educational system designed to produce complacent consumers, not thoughtful citizens, and left ignorant of current events by a media devoted solely to profit, many will internalize the force-fed values of the ruling elite, and act accordingly. There will be little need for overt methods of control.”

The first step in activating those people who are willing to act is to first tell them the bitter truth. Cooperation with the system, including the Democratic party, is a recipe for continued warfare, loss of civil liberties and increased corporate power.

And this… I had heard/read that Patty Murray and Inslee were dispatched by DC Dems to WA to squash a state level call for impeachment, Kimberley makes it clear, McDermott was in on the deal:

He should be joined by the Democratic politicians in Washington state who scuttled a state legislator’s plan to introduce an impeachment resolution. Congressmen Jim McDermott and Jay Inslee (*link Washington) need to join Conyers on the unemployment line and Washingtonian progressives should commit themselves to making that happen. If they don’t, they can look forward to more inaction as the Bush crimes grow worse and worse.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

BAR has a Naomi Klein article - on the Shock Doctrine, free markets, Friedman, Katrina and the wars, the disaster opportunities, the ”strategy of tension” (strategia della tensione) as I call it… I am losing track, having read several of her pieces this week, but think this is a variation on her distillation:

I started researching the free market’s dependence on the power of shock four years ago, during the early days of the occupation of Iraq. I reported from Baghdad on Washington’s failed attempts to follow “shock and awe” with shock therapy – mass privatization, complete free trade, a 15% flat tax, a dramatically downsized government. Afterwards I traveled to Sri Lanka, several months after the devastating 2004 tsunami, and witnessed another version of the same maneuver: foreign investors and international lenders [read:  Bush sr and that new son for Bar, Bill Clinton  -- Mcat] had teamed up to use the atmosphere of panic to hand the entire beautiful coastline over to entrepreneurs who quickly built large resorts, blocking hundreds of thousands of fishing people from rebuilding their villages. By the time Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans, it was clear that this was now the preferred method of advancing corporate goals: using moments of collective trauma to engage in radical social and economic engineering.

Most people who survive a disaster want the opposite of a clean slate: they want to salvage whatever they can and begin repairing what was not destroyed. “When I rebuild the city I feel like I’m rebuilding myself,” said Cassandra Andrews, a resident of New Orleans’ heavily damaged Lower Ninth Ward, as she cleared away debris after the storm. But disaster capitalists have no interest in repairing what once was. In Iraq, Sri Lanka and New Orleans, the process deceptively called “reconstruction” began with finishing the job of the original disaster by erasing what was left of the public sphere.

a bit more:

As I dug deeper into the history of how this market model had swept the globe, I discovered that the idea of exploiting crisis and disaster has been the modus operandi of Friedman’s movement from the very beginning – this fundamentalist form of capitalism has always needed disasters to advance. What was happening in Iraq and New Orleans was not a post-September 11 invention. Rather, these bold experiments in crisis exploitation were the culmination of three decades of strict adherence to the shock doctrine.

Seen through the lens of this doctrine, the past 35 years look very different.

Pushing it, a little more:

In a few short years, the complex has already expanded its market reach from fighting terrorism to international peacekeeping, to municipal policing, to responding to increasingly frequent natural disasters. The ultimate goal for the corporations at the center of the complex is to bring the model of for-profit government, which advances so rapidly in extraordinary circumstances, into the ordinary functioning of the state – in effect, to privatize the government.
In scale, the disaster capitalism complex is on a par with the “emerging market” and IT booms of the 90s. It is dominated by US firms, but is global, with British companies bringing their experience in security cameras, Israeli firms their expertise in building hi-tech fences and walls. Combined with soaring insurance industry profits as well as super profits for the oil industry, the disaster economy may well have saved the world market from the full-blown recession it was facing on the eve of 9/11.

If Naomi has not made it clear… for those with eyes. And I hand it to her, not the same article spread around, she takes a shaft of information and expands it, moves to another shaft for a different article and concentrates there, always building to the whole… Very valuable observer and reporter.

Wish we had more…

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Last, Glen Ford takes an unsparing look at the Congressional Black Caucus, building up to their Lawn Jockey Awards..

The CBC has been rendered a wasteland, in which nothing of substance can occur. Corporate penetration of the Black congressional ranks has rendered the CBC incapable of fulfilling its avowed mission of being the “conscience of the Congress” – a dream that was smothered by an avalanche of corporate cash. A cabal of rightwing, corporate-bought members vetoes any progressive initiatives that emanate from the 42-member Black House delegation, negating progressive politics and leaving no room for anything but vapid celebration of Black faces in high places. That’s what the annual CBC Legislative party-time has become: a promenade of strivers and wannabes with no mission beyond their own private ambitions.

Ford calls them “derelicts”… sure beats Kos calling Artur Davis a great orator.

**************************************

Comments

1. liberalcatnip - 13 September 2007

Just dropping off this tidbit before I hit the sack: Most think founders wanted Christian USA. The cognitive dissonance found in those poll results really is stunning. NCLB seems to have morphed into No Christian Left Behind.

2. Revisionist - 13 September 2007

Its because of the way they teach US history. They focus on the religious people coming over — often not notin that some were just too extreme for the english and the dutch.

they leave out the fact that most everyone came over to make money. A PBS special once refered to colonial settlements as the dotcoms of their day.

then some people moved west to get away from the religuos wackos in new england.

most of the smart guys were deists at best but some where christian as was the norm of there era. and some where hardcore. they expected people would be religous but just didnt want the state being influenced by any paticular religous group. see europe for exapmples of how that tend to play out.

anther reason i dont get the israel support is a theocratic government is really an anthesis of american ideals

3. Marie - 13 September 2007

Have a piece up at TLC Angels Dancing on the Head of a Pin

4. Revisionist - 13 September 2007

Hsuicide Note!!!!!!

5. Shadowthief - 13 September 2007

From the Very Big File of Very Bad Ideas Whose Time We Hope Shall Never Come:

President Petraeus? Iraqi official recalls the day US general revealed ambition
By Patrick Cockburn
Published: 13 September 2007

The US commander in Iraq, General David Petraeus, expressed long-term interest in running for the US presidency when he was stationed in Baghdad, according to a senior Iraqi official who knew him at that time.

Sabah Khadim, then a senior adviser at Iraq’s Interior Ministry, says General Petraeus discussed with him his ambition when the general was head of training and recruitment of the Iraqi army in 2004-05.

“I asked him if he was planning to run in 2008 and he said, ‘No, that would be too soon’,” Mr Khadim, who now lives in London, said.

General Petraeus has a reputation in the US Army for being a man of great ambition. If he succeeds in reversing America’s apparent failure in Iraq, he would be a natural candidate for the White House in the presidential election in 2012.

His able defence of the “surge” in US troop numbers in Iraq as a success before Congress this week has made him the best-known soldier in America. An articulate, intelligent and energetic man, he has always shown skill in managing the media.

But General Petraeus’s open interest in the presidency may lead critics to suggest that his own political ambitions have influenced him in putting an optimistic gloss on the US military position in Iraq .

Mr Khadim was a senior adviser in the Iraqi Interior Ministry in 2004-05 when Iyad Allawi was prime minister.

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article2956422.ece

Just when you thought things couldn’t get any worse. President Petraeus. Killer asteroid, where art thou?

6. Shadowthief - 13 September 2007

I’m tinned meat :)

7. marisacat - 13 September 2007

ST

Clemons at The Washington Note has mentined about Petraeus and the presidency.

WIll see if I can find it, it was the past couple weeks, iirc.

8. lucid - 13 September 2007

crap (12+ / 0-)
Recommended by:qwerty, Dems2004, DebtorsPrison, tryptamine, Matilda, Eternal Hope, Elise, deepfish, wiscmass, ChapiNation386, GoldnI, Femlaw
spoon was logged in on a comp i normally use. preceding comment is mine–you listening, marisacat?

From the thread linked in the last thread… So Heckofanasshole degrades women just like his bro… go figure. My response, just in case it makes the HC:

* [new] Funny (0 / 0)
I always thought the idea was equality, not mealy mouthed obfuscations praising the 19th century maternalism.

You set up a false choice – ’some nebulous idea of a woman that you don’t articulate’ vs. ‘the housewife’ & ‘feminism’ is about the ability to ‘choose’ the latter…

Last I checked, feminism was about women having the ability to choose whatever the fuck life they want – and being recognized in their choices & rewarded in their choices as equals.

by lucid on Thu Sep 13, 2007 at 03:58:52 AM EDT

[ Parent | Reply to This ]

9. lucid - 13 September 2007

I think I potted meat product… Fancy that given the topic was Elise.

10. marisacat - 13 September 2007

you listening, marisacat?

LOL They flatter themselves. I have read all of ONE of the useless feminismsssssss diaries. One.

Nor did I follow the link earlier. Dkos and its barnyard animals are predictble on rights, for anyone.

11. Madman in the Marketplace - 13 September 2007

wow, an entire ninja hurricane snuck in past the media under cover of Britney and Westmoreland.

Off to work. Have a good day.

12. Madman in the Marketplace - 13 September 2007

Rev. Yearwood is on Democracy Now this morning (I really am leaving for work … damn you Amy!), crutches in hand.

Yearwood: If they can beat on me in the halls of Congress, they will come and on beat on you next.

13. aemd - 13 September 2007

Naomi Klein’s use of the phrase “for-profit government” says it all. A nice little sound bite for any political entity not on the take. Not that I know of any.

14. marisacat - 13 September 2007

Hagel testy on the Today Show. LOL He called Meredith Vieira “dear”.

15. brinn - 13 September 2007

re#8 — lucid, I love that comment, how interesting that no one there has rated it or responded to it.

re#11 — MitM, I noticed that too, ‘course Humberto was not quite so stealthy from where I sit! ;)
But at least I’m not in Houston…..not that being in H-town is EVER an attractive option.

Sorry I’ve been scarce around here of late — have been reading but, getting the boys settled into the school routine, cranking out job apps., and dealing with the physical effects of killer allergy attacks for two weeks, the molds here are at record highs (going to doc today), I haven’t felt much like writing!

Hope ya’ll are well — has anyone heard from Tuston?

16. marisacat - 13 September 2007

brinn – no word from Tuston…

************

LOL Revisionist, FLH sprinkles his pixie dust on you. In the headline anyway.

17. supervixen - 13 September 2007

Re: the feminizzzzzms thing: lucid, great comment.

The key thing to remember about Elise and the other bleating sheep is that they are not real feminists. They are frauds. I know I say this over and over but it’s true and needs to be recognized. It’s part of a much larger pattern of “pretend progressives”. They dismiss all criticism as too “purist” but that enables them to slide further and further to the right. People like Elise do not support true equality and true progressivism. “Why shouldn’t women be able to choose to live traditional stereotypes?” Well, for the same reason that black people should not be choosing to live traditional stereotypes. The fact is that traditional stereotypes enforce the traditional concept of women/blacks as inferior and limited. The “traditional” stay-at-home wife/mother was good for nothing else. She did that because it was her obligation and she had no rights or opportunities to expand her horizons beyond that. Yes it’s fine to be a stay-at-home wife/mother, I’m one myself, but I’m not a “traditional” one. I have a career outside of that and am involved in many other things that are not traditionally “female”.

Let us not forget that there are forces at work that want to push women back into medieval times. They want to enforce the traditional image of women as “different” and suited to “feminine” pursuits. This concept is antithetical to liberation and equality. While dweebs like Elise babble about which “wave” of feminism they don’t belong to, and waste time distancing themselves from Robin Morgan, Friedan and Dworkin, these forces grow in power and influence.

18. Sabrina - 13 September 2007

Lol, Lucid, I think your comment is a little deep for the diarist – so is this the new or the old feminism?

Hi Brinn – glad everything is alright with you. I really do wish Tuston would check in also.

19. JJB - 13 September 2007

One of our new “allies” in al-Anbar has been assassinated:

Bomb Kills Sunni Sheik Working With U.S. in Iraq

The leader of local Sunni tribes in Iraq who have joined American and Iraqi forces in fighting extremist Sunni militants was killed by a bomb today, Iraqi police officials said, potentially undermining what has become a new thrust of United States policy in the country.

The Sunni leader, Abdul Sattar Buzaigh al-Rishawi, led the Anbar Salvation Council, an alliance of clans supporting the Iraqi government and American forces. Initial reports suggested he was killed either by a bomb in his car or by a roadside bomb close to his car near his home in Anbar Province, the sprawling region west of Baghdad.

[snip]

In President Bush’s trip last week to Iraq, he visited Anbar rather than Baghdad and forcefully directed attention at the security gains the growing alliance between American and tribal forces had brought. Sheik Abdul Sattar was among the tribal leaders who met with him on Sept. 3 at al-Asad Air Base in Anbar, the AP reported. He was the latest and most significant of sheiks leading that effort to be killed, and his death comes as President Bush prepares to discuss his Iraq strategy in a nationwide address this evening.. . . [Sheik Abdul Sattar's] death could be a significant setback for American efforts to work more closely with local tribes against Al Qaeda.

Authorities imposed a state of emergency in Anbar Province following his assassination, police officials said. At least one other person escorting him was also killed in the explosion.

“This action makes a crack and makes it a mess for all those who wanted to be aligned with him,” Salim al-Jubori, a spokesman for the largest Sunni Arab block in the Iraqi Parliament, said. “I believe there are other leaders who will take this on, but this is not easy.”

On the domestic front, the consequences of BushCo.’s failed policies are glaringly apparent yet again as Hurrican Humberto adds to the misery of people made miserable by Hurricane Rita 2 years ago:

Humberto, the first hurricane to hit the U.S. Gulf Coast in two years, sneaked up on southeast Texas overnight and crashed ashore Thursday with heavy rains and 80-mph winds, killing at least one person.

The greatest concern for many Texas residents was the heavy rain falling in areas already inundated by a wet summer.

Humberto made landfall near the same spot Hurricane Rita did in 2005, and areas of southwest Louisiana not fully recovered from Rita were bracing for more misery.

“I’m in a FEMA trailer (because of Rita) and I’m on oxygen,” said Albertha Garrett, 70, who spent the night at a shelter in the Lake Charles Civic Center. “I had to come to the civic center just in case the lights would go out, because I’m alone and I’m handicapped.”

No word on how this might affect New Orleans, where it will presumably rain very heavily. BTW, my sister-in-law (who’s a pediatrician) spent about a week in NO recently, traveling there with a church group trying to resuscitate a couple of neighborhoods. She had to sleep on a church basement floor in Metarie, and walk two blocks to shower and use the toilet in another church. Vast areas are still devastated and either underpopulated or unpopulated, with no running water, gas, electricity, etc. One local thanked them for their efforts, noting that they were the only people to come through and do anything to help them in quite a while.

20. marisacat - 13 September 2007

Pepe Escobar is up at ATimes with a version (pre assasination) of what is happening in Anbar province:

Petraeus has not been able to seduce or bribe Sunni guerrillas. Far from it: leading groups such as the Jaysh Ansar al-Sunna, the 1920 Revolution Brigades and the Islamic Front for the Iraqi Resistance make it very clear their enemies remain the US occupation, the Maliki government and al-Qaeda in the Land of the Two Rivers.

This summer, three of these groups – the 1920 Revolution Brigades, Ansar al-Sunna and Iraqi Hamas – formed the Political Office for the Iraqi Resistance, a public political alliance basically to throw out all of Petraeus’s troops, block any collaboration with occupation-endorsed political institutions, and declare null and void any agreement between the US and the Iraqi government.

By this time, way into the “surge”, Petraeus had certainly figured out that Anbar was not a relevant war theater anymore. He can use it to spin the “success” of his counterinsurgency methods, but he knows the three really relevant, internal wars in Iraq, for the near future, will be in Baghdad (between Sunnis and Shi’ites), in Basra (between Shi’ite militias, to see who gets to control the oil) and in Kirkuk (between Kurds and Arabs/Turkomans, for the same reason).

21. Hair Club for Men - 13 September 2007

Listening to David Swanson and John Nichols it appears that the impeachment movement is about to be folded into a Stop Hillary candidate in the primaries.

22. marisacat - 13 September 2007

HC

Think you are right.

23. Hair Club for Men - 13 September 2007

A prediction I hope don’t turn out to be right about.

Adjusting tinfoil.

That Bush front group that’s coming to DC this Saturday to have a “let our troops win” rally have instructions to start fights with the anti-war marchers.

Cops will be on hand to “stop” these conflicts. Fox News will also be on hand. Some right-wing vet will be “spit” on and it will be filmed. These scuffles will also turn nasty enough to allow the DC Park police to start cracking down on future anti-war protests (as well as to arrest some of the leaders of the anti-war movement on some nasty trumped up charges of conspiracy to start a riot etc.) .

24. marisacat - 13 September 2007

YUMMY!

Tyrell again on Hillary and Norman. Hsu that is.

25. marisacat - 13 September 2007
26. undercover - 13 September 2007

Might as well be JewishKos:

The State of Jewish Blogging

Blogging_2Jewish blogger Mik Moore raises an important point about the way American Jewish organizations relate to Web 2.0 and the blogosphere. The issue he notes is beyond the relative dearth of Jews at the Daily Kos convention:
snip
zellmad,
A huge number the avid Dailykos readers I know, including myself, are Jewish.

It isn’t antisemitic site. It is a rather huge opinion leading site, which disagrees with a number of policies.

Maybe our Jewish American organizations proporting to represent us ought to be reading what Jewish Americans have to say instead of what a hardine minority in Israel tell them to falsely represent in Washington as our views — as was done with the denial Armenian genocide.

Posted by: Dave at Sep 4, 2007 2:44:31 PM

snip

There is still a regular run of pro-”Palestinian” diaries on Daily Kos (see /tag/israel). The anti-Israel diarists and commenters as of late have been more careful, because of the bannings of the worse offenders, though I think all it would take to change things is another event on the lines of last year’s war. Most importantly, the very fact that people with an anti-Israel agenda (I’m not talking about mere criticism of the 1967 territories settlers, I’m talking about calls to end Israel as a Jewish state, God forbid) have felt it appropriate to voice such sentiments in a site with a relatively respectable image like Daily Kos speaks volumes.

There are Jews posting on Daily Kos. Some are of the self-damaging type (including one with a handle trumpeting it loudly: “jon the antizionist jew”). Others are pro-Israel, but try to maintain a balanced stance, a veneer of “voices of reason”. Yet others try valiantly to defend Israel and Zionism. And there is at least one who left Daily Kos in distress (Eyal Rosenberg).

As I said, Daily Kos is far from the worst. However, it’s a good case of kal va-chomer: if DKos has had its share of anti-Zionist miscreants, then heaven knows what lurks below the surface.

Posted by: ZionistYoungster at Sep 4, 2007 7:44:02 PM

http://backspin.typepad.com/backspin/2007/09/the-state-of-je.html

27. liberalcatnip - 13 September 2007

If the fate of Anbar rests in the life or death of one Sunni leader, that looks like a damn fragile “peace” to me.

28. JJB - 13 September 2007

Well, “the fate of Anbar” has as much to do with successfully pacifying Iraq as British victories in the Arabian and Mesopotamian theatres had to do with winning the First World War. No matter what Allenby and the other British generals did there, if the Germans had prevailed on the Western Front, the war would have been lost. Even if Petraeus and BushCo. were right about Anbar, it means nothing if Baghdad, Basra, and the areas that lie in between them are in chaos.

29. JJB - 13 September 2007

BTW, the name of the assassinated Sunni sheik is Abdul Sattar Buzaigh al-Rishawi, which is very similar to the leader referenced in the Pepe Escobar article, Abdul Satter Abu Risha. I don’t know if they’re one and the same person, but the descriptions of them in the two articles also sound very much alike.

30. marisacat - 13 September 2007

hmm I don’t know what ot make of Anbar. A couple threads ago I posted a link to Stan Goff on the meaning of the brokered “deal” in Anbar and the recent visit by Bush (his piece is much more than my snip)…. he sees it as the beginning of the end.

I just don’t know what “end” that might be.

31. Revisionist - 13 September 2007

self-damaging type

32. Revisionist - 13 September 2007

notice the GIYUS ad at the link posted by undercover….

33. JJB - 13 September 2007

Trumpeting this “success” in Anbar is part of the Flavor-Of-The-Month approach that BushCo. is taking. Remember when they bragged about the tremendous success Petraeus had made of Tal Afar? They don’t date mention that city these days because the violence there is out of control. They’ve got to find something to keep the war going, and this is just the latest case of releasing propaganda shouting “Victory is within our grasp is only we try a little harder!”

34. marisacat - 13 September 2007

well I don’t think Goff is trumpeting some success.

ATimes posted last year – think it was Pepe, too – on the big meeting of the SUnni sheikhs, will see if I can find it.

35. JJB - 13 September 2007

undercover/dkosser/KeithMoon/WhateverYourNextAliasWillBe,

Why don’t you just call yourself “moron”? You might as well, because you’re so transparent you don’t do anything except make people laugh at your ineptitude.

36. undercover - 13 September 2007

….hey, I’m undercover. I don’t think dkos should be controlled by Zionists. Just letting you read what some of the Jewish sites are saying. Guess I can’t post undercover anymore.

37. Revisionist - 13 September 2007

another job i did not apply for

Six years ago today the USA changed forever! I doubt anyone will ever forget 9/11 2001 and nor should we ever forget. Let us not let those innocent people die in vain. Please remember who is after the USA and what they intend.
Here is a quote for the day to ponder:

“Freedom leads to prosperity, freedom replaces the ancient hatreds among nations with comity and peace. FREEDOM is the victor!” – President Ronald Reagan on the Berlin Wall

Okay…on to business!

Please check us out on http://www.adguysatlanta.com

We are the finest advertising headhunters in the biz and we have some wonderful clients from coast to coast. !

38. Marie - 13 September 2007

#19 – will GWB shed buckets of tears for his now dead new best friend? My guess is, “Sheik who?”

39. JJB - 13 September 2007

Marie,

This is particularly bad news for BushCo. because they’re probably holding back on announcing fatalities for a few days so as not to offer any counterpoint to Bush’s speech. They did this as well for his recent trip to Anbar. The most recent fatality is said to have taken place on Monday, I would imagine that by Sunday at the latest we’ll see at least a few dead listed for the period 9/11 through 9/13 (the various son et lumiere exercises surrounding the former probably factored into the embargo as well). Of course if a helicopter crash or some such disaster kills a larger number of troops at once that will probably leak out.

40. bayprairie - 13 September 2007

But at least I’m not in Houston…..not that being in H-town is EVER an attractive option.

i suppose it sucks to be me then. gy god, condemned to hell again due to geographic location.

and you live where now?

41. JJB - 13 September 2007

You ever have the feeling you’re so transparent no one can even see you? I never have, but someone trying to hurl muck on this site today certainly should, because that’s what’s happened to him.

:-)

42. ms_xeno - 13 September 2007

ZYouth:

…Some are of the self-damaging type (including one with a handle trumpeting it loudly: “jon the antizionist jew”)…

“Self-damaging ?”

It’s true. Jon bites his nails. And I’m shovelling down the treif (leftover shrimp stir-fry) even as we speak. Don’t mince words, you putz. Just say “self-hating.” It’s worked for your elders for years. Why mess with success ?

Oh, it’s a schande for the goyim, all right…

43. ms_xeno - 13 September 2007

SV: Elise thinks she’s going to be Evita in the New World Order. Or possibly Eleanor of Aquitaine, depending on her tastes in fashion these days.

Queens, Princesses and Royal Consorts don’t need your stinking women’s lib. So back to the kitchen with you. :p

44. CSTAR - 13 September 2007

Re Shock and Awe economics.

Possibly the first application of the Shock Doctrine on a national scale was applied post September 11 (1973 that is) in Chile. The privatization of retirement savings certainly preceded the same here in the US,. One can expect that the very poor performance of the system in meeting retirement expectations there will be matched by the same here.

As I watch the value of my retirement savings gyrate with the whims of who-knows-what, I wonder what I’ll be reduced to when I retire..if ever. Oh, and I’m a very cautious and substantial saver. I read carefully and obsessively the fine print of the prospectus; for whatever it’s worth, I also have a Ph D in math and can do financial calculations. Doesn’t do much good, I’m afraid when somebody else is playing with your money. One’s better off being a crook.

This reminds me of a comedy skit that I once on SNL (some guy sings in the metro pleading desperately for money, is given money by a bystander, singer complains it’s only a song, repeat) Here the singer is some incarnation of Milton Friedman singing the praises of the market, and we the fools, are the bystanders that plunk the money in, and are told “Oh but you didn’t assess the risk, and that’s the price you pay for the freedom of the market”. Repeat.

45. marisacat - 13 September 2007

ObamaRama in Iowa yesterday… It’s the war stupid and nothing else.

Now is not the time to reargue the Vietnam War – we did that in the 2004 election, and it wasn’t pretty. I come from a new generation of Americans. I don’t want to fight the battles of the 1960s. [don't worry, those "issues" are being nullified in the courts, at a higher pay scale than yours --- Mcat] I want to reclaim the future for America, because we have too many threats to face and too many opportunities to seize. Just think about what we can accomplish together when we end this war.

When we end this war in Iraq, we can finally finish the fight in Afghanistan. That is why I propose stepping up our commitment there, with at least two additional combat brigades and a comprehensive program of aid and support to help Afghans help themselves.

When we end this war in Iraq, we can more effectively tackle the twin demons of extremism and hopelessness that threaten the peace of the world and the security of America. That is why I have proposed a program to spread hope – not hate – in the Islamic world, to build schools that teach young people to build and not destroy, to support the rule of law and economic development, and to launch a program of outreach to the Islamic world that I will lead as President.

When we end this war in Iraq, we can once again lead the world against the common challenges of the 21st century. Against the spread of nuclear weapons and climate change. Against genocide in Darfur. Against ignorance and intolerance. Corruption and greed. Poverty and despair. When we end this war, we can reclaim the cause of freedom and democracy. We can be that beacon of hope, that light to all the world.

When we end this war, we can recapture our unity of effort as Americans. The American people have the right instincts on Iraq. It’s time to heed their judgment. It’s time to move beyond Iraq so that we can move forward together. I will be a President who listens to the American people, not a President who ignores them.

And when we end the war in Iraq, we can come together to give our full attention to advancing the cause of health care for every American, an energy policy that does not bankroll hostile nations while we melt the polar ice caps, and a world class education for our children. Above all, we can turn the page to a new kind of politics of unity, not division; of hope, not fear.

Thanks I got the church choir refrain: when we end this war in Iraq

When the Pied Piper returns iwth the children.

46. D. Throat - 13 September 2007

Wow… it think someone just came up with a new term for the ultimate “sell out” and it is called “Docudharma”

Geez… do they really think that they can redeem Armando, Jay Elias and NightStalkKitty… by hiding up under OPOL hat…????

Very sad state of affairs when the BBBs are now pretending to be the blogs that mock them.

Open Left is a complete flop… more interesting to watch paint dry and MLW and BMT have died ugly and boring deaths.

First there was Mcat… which they ALL read even though they are too afraid to comment … then came PFF and in a few short week blew all of the baby BBBs off the boards… now this “Astro” turf crap… shameful.

I read the list of Budy’s FPers and thought it was a sick joke… might as well add Elise and Luscious Vagina for all the difference it would make from DK.

The only thing that I find amusing about the latest DK spinoff … is that is shows that Mcat’s blog has had an incredible impact on the BBB’s and they are now running scared trying to keep all of the little blogging Indians on the reservation.

My God… to put Armando on another front page is ludicrous… talk about Reality Based…. NOT!!!!

47. marisacat - 13 September 2007

mattes has posted a I/P diary over at docudharma, to see the result.

Interesting sub thread on rules issues who posts etc., in the docudharma announce at PFF.

48. ms_xeno - 13 September 2007

Telling that Obama doesn’t talk about all the other wars we have brewing. No matter. The next one will have a much more humane stacking of bodies. Since Dems will be running it.

Please tell me that fool doesn’t seriously think we’re going to “mop up” anything in Afghanistan but more of the same. Pathetic.

49. D. Throat - 13 September 2007

It’s bullshit.

Even those that are not recognizable are just Dkossers under new names. Straight off they are plugging for DCCC candidates… and cross linking only to “certified” blogs…. like L. Vagina’s new Del blog.

Any blog that puts The Last Hurrah as a favorite is definitely tied, strapped and plugged into the BBB network…. bullshit blog with bullshit comments trying to light a fire under yet another fake “grassroots” endeavor by Kos.

50. marisacat - 13 September 2007

From the mattes diary at docudonot… Turkana and scatcrawler just could not wait.

Damn if I can see anything wrong with mattes’ diary…

one thing i’m going to request (0.00 / 0)

because we’re still trying to figure out how to deal with what is a very divisive and, at times, on some blogs, poisonous topic…

in the early stages of this blog, please don’t post a lot of i/p, or don’t rec them up. a lot of people are alienated as soon as they see them. we want to be able to discuss pretty much anything, here, but we don’t want to scare people away, when they see the same names arguing the same topic that poisoned other sites. as i’ve said, i think you became one of the better i/p diarists. but please don’t use this site as a means to address all the grievances, all the lost time, and all the anger you have from what happened on other sites. please give us time to suck people in and hold them, and to figure out the best way to handle an issue that has been a problem on more than one site. you’ve written good stuff on other topics, so please also do that.

the glory, the love, the madness.

——————————————————————————–

by: Turkana @ Sun Sep 09, 2007 at 20:34:05 PM CDT
[ Parent ]

I remember Wingless’s excuse was that I/P was a “painful” issue.

51. ms_xeno - 13 September 2007

Elias says his country has gotten by in the past without any help from the U.S.

I suppose if he’s talking about the Old Testament era, he’s right.

:/

52. D. Throat - 13 September 2007

Pathetic!!!

I saw that Jay Elias was chomping at the bit… so Turkana stepped in and squelched “freedom of speech”…. who the hell are they trying to attract??? Dkossers??? Then stay the fuck on DK!

53. marisacat - 13 September 2007

Broken News…

Breaking News from ABCNEWS.com:

WHITE HOUSE PREVIEW: IN TONIGHT’S SPEECH, PRESIDENT BUSH IS EXPECTED TO ANNOUNCE PLANS TO PULL 5,700 TROOPS OUT OF IRAQ BY THE YEAR’S END

http://abcnews.go.com?CMP=EMC-1396

Sounds like the Sen Warner ‘Home for Christmas for a drop in the bucket’ plan.

Which way to Red square, the Kremlin and Lenin’s Tomb…

54. D. Throat - 13 September 2007

Elias says his country has gotten by in the past without any help from the U.S.

Perhaps they should give back the billions and billions of dollars in “handouts”… I know some people in New Orleans who could use a handout or two.

What I wanna know is… who the fuck do they think they are kidding?????

55. ms_xeno - 13 September 2007

D. Throat, the rats are seeking a new ship, but one that resembles the old one as much as possible.

Funny that there are groups like JATO or Jews United For Peace and Justice who could probably teach these folks a little something, if they wanted to learn. (Cough.)

mattes has a hopeful nature. I don’t share it.

56. CSTAR - 13 September 2007

Yippee, let’s start a blog!!

in the early stages of this blog, please don’t post a lot of i/p, or don’t rec them up.

Huh?

57. marisacat - 13 September 2007
58. D. Throat - 13 September 2007

D. Throat, the rats are seeking a new ship, but one that resembles the old one as much as possible.

I wonder if Kos is selling up??? I think that the BBB have reached it’s end… they are bullshit… and have lost all credibility.

59. JJB - 13 September 2007

Sigh . . .

Elias says his country has gotten by in the past without any help from the U.S.

Without American money, whether from private sources or outright aid from US tax dollars, Israel would never have had a prayer of existing, much less lasting almost 60 years and seizing a lot more than double the territory originally given it.

And if Israel keeps pursuing the same unsuccessful policies w/r/t its neighbors, it won’t last any longer than the Crusader Kingdoms did. In fact at this rate, I’d be surprised if Israel is able to celebrate a 100th anniversary. That’s not something I want to be right about, it seems to me inevitable. They may never be able to come to terms with the Muslim world they live in, but waging perpetual war is a guaranteed recipe for failure.

60. D. Throat - 13 September 2007

waging perpetual war is a guaranteed recipe for

HANDOUTS!!!! by the BILLIONS.

61. D. Throat - 13 September 2007

After we fought those battles….with DH being the best example of the top down BS that you refer to...and won the right to post on impeachment without having admins trolling us, I stepped back to see what we had really won. That was when I finally realized that changing Dkos wasn’t really gonna do squat. As we can see now the Dems aren’t listening anyway

by buhdydharma @ Thu Sep 13, 2007 at 14:53:09 PM CDT

More Sites We Like
- Balkinization
- Booman Tribune (Tied to BBBs)
- Blue House Diaries (Tied to BBBs)
- Earth Portal
- ePluribus Media (Tied to BBBs)
- Hysterical Raisins
- i can has cheezburger
- Kid Oakland (Tied to BBBs)
- myDD (Tied to BBBs)
- My Left Wing (Tied to BBBs)
- Open Left (Tied to BBBs)
- Political Cortex (Tied to BBBs)

- Political Flesh Feast
- Political Nexus (Tied to BBBs)
- Political Wire
- Swampland
- Swing State Project (Tied to BBBs)
- Tapped (Tied to BBBs)

- The Agitator
- The Next Hurrah (YES This is DHinMI’s Blog)
- The Oil Drum
- Unapologetic Mexican
Stop the War

Again… who the hell does he think he is kidding????

62. ms_xeno - 13 September 2007

Thanks, JJB. But I’m not the one who needs convincing. :/

63. D. Throat - 13 September 2007

Well who cares… Kos seems to be mysteriously rolling in dough even though his hits are way down… it is all a farce… sadly Buhdy and OPOL are now part and parcel of this fiasco.

64. marisacat - 13 September 2007

It’s the old DHinMI vs Armando divide.

same old same old. From the docudharma announce at PFF (bold is mine):

NPK and I (4.00 / 1)

connected early on. Then we had fierce battles. Then we made up.

I see her as a person, much deeper and more complex than most of the Troll Patrol.

I know from my own life and the changes I have gone through that people do change.

I try not to write anyone off…..except DH.

by buhdydharma @ Thu Sep 13, 2007 at 13:14:11 PM PDT
[ Parent | Respond to this Idiocy

65. D. Throat - 13 September 2007

Buhdy is pathetic.

One thing I have to say about the BBB and their acolytes is that they are a true mirror of the Democratic Party… Lying crooked bastards… the lot of them. I think I would have still liked the DP if I had not followed these blogs… a real eye opener.

He didn’t even have the balls to write off DH as TLH is on his list of “favorites”.

66. supervixen - 13 September 2007

I see her as a person, much deeper and more complex than most of the Troll Patrol.

ROTFLMAO. Buhdydharma is such a moron. Him and his stupid pony pics.

67. Revisionist - 13 September 2007

update 30… judge tried to set bail at 50 mill

68. CSTAR - 13 September 2007

I saw this on C Rose a few years ago (before I realized that Rose really was a closet neocon). When I saw it then, I thought I had misheard it. Nope.

Disgusting.

69. Hair Club for Men - 13 September 2007

Without American money, whether from private sources or outright aid from US tax dollars, Israel would never have had a prayer of existing,

If you really want to know what country Israel most resembles, it’s this one.

http://www.virtualokinawa.com/military/

70. Hair Club for Men - 13 September 2007

Buhdy is pathetic.

Since David Swanson and John Nichols seem to have given up on impeachment and seem to be ready to get behind John Edwards, what’s going to happen to all those pro-impeachment diaries on DKOS?

Edwards vs. Hillary flame wars?

71. Hair Club for Men - 13 September 2007

Elise thinks she’s going to be Evita in the New World Order. Or possibly Eleanor of Aquitaine, depending on her tastes in fashion these days.

Ruined a perfectly good PJ Harvey song.

I can’t watch this without thinking that blond with the sour look is thinking “but what does all this have to do with electing Democrats”.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=8A83JorcLaU

72. Revisionist - 13 September 2007

jjb — there were a couple of stories earlier this year about younger generation of germans – late boomers and xers – getting really fed up with being guilted into paying israel for shit that happened before they were even born. they want the payments to stop. the israelis freaked out.

then a few montsh later we have children of holocaust survivors wanting to sue germany for repartaions because they got contact stress from their parents.

73. Hair Club for Men - 13 September 2007

then a few montsh later we have children of holocaust survivors wanting to sue germany for repartaions because they got contact stress from their parents.

Moon/Dkosser was arguing yesterday that the USA was as morally complicit in the art of dispossing brown people as Israel is.

Oddly enough, I agree with Mr. Moon here.

But let’s throw a twist into this argument.

If the USA is guilty of genocide and slavery, then isn’t the USA just like Germany?

And if Germany needs to pay reparations to Jews, then don’t Americans (including “Manhttan boy” Keith Moon) have to pay reperations to blacks for slavery?

Now we can compare slavery to the Holocaust if we want. The Holocaust was a more intense genocide lasting under a decade.

Slavery was almost as intense and it lasted from 1607 to 1865 and then in the form of Jim Crow from 1865 to 1964.

So where are the reperations for slavery?

74. marisacat - 13 September 2007

HC

an awful lot of Obama in the Swanson swirl, too.

What a mistake.

I remmeber months ago I used a 57 cadillac de ville to typify the Edwardses, it was just a joke, but frankly they do make me think of the 50s.

Hell so does Obama. The go along sort.

Save us… spare us. UNACCEPTABLE.

75. Hair Club for Men - 13 September 2007

To add to that, if Martians visited the USA and learned that there was a major holocaust memorial on the Capitol Mall and also learned about:

1.) The Holocaust (which Americans had nothing to do with)
2.) Slavery (which Americans carried out themselves)

and they found out that the Genocide memorial on the Capitol Mall was dedicated to something Americans didn’t do instead of something they did do wouldn’t they conclude this?

American guilt over the Holocaust is a self-serving feel good exercise in self-delusion that allows them to escape responsiblity for their own history and justify their oil stealing in the Middle East.

76. Revisionist - 13 September 2007

Iraqi Prime Minister Maliki is now routinely refusing to meet US Congressional delegations on fact-finding missions in Iraq, according to US Senator Ben Nelson (D-Nebraska), who characterized Maliki’s decision as a “mistake.” Nelson, who will be part of a Congressional delegation visiting Iraq in the coming days, told CNN today that the group is going to Baghdad to “find out what is happening with the Maliki government.” Nelson said “Maliki himself is not taking any meetings with Congressional delegations…

77. Hair Club for Men - 13 September 2007

an awful lot of Obama in the Swanson swirl.

John Nichols was being sneaky about it on Democracy Now. He first brings up Richardson and Kucinich as viable anti-war candidates (it seems Richardson the world’s whitest Mexican is now for immediate withdrawl) then adds that Edwards and Obama are halfway there but not there yet.

Then he goes on to criticize Edwards for only being halfway their (implicitly arguing of course that “we” should push him).

I actually respect John Nichols and Swanson. I think they’re both good people who have worked their asses off for impeachment.

But sorry, I can’t follow them into the Edwards campaign.

78. Shadowthief - 13 September 2007

#59–JJB–actually, Israel didn’t receive a substantial amount of aid from the US in its early years, although of course it was the American government that gave its blessing to the establishment of Israel.

Israel’s main patron in its early decades (1950s and early 1960s) was France, not the United States.

The shift to full-fledged US support for Israel came during LBJ’s administration, and has now transmuted into a fetishism that has warped American foreign policy outside the limits of rational self-interest.

79. Revisionist - 13 September 2007

I couldnt find the link…. but there were also some youger german police who caused a stir because they refused to attend a holocaust seminar as part of their training saying it was outdated, irrelevant and designed solely to make them feel guilty for something they had no part in that took place 30 years before they were born.

80. Sabrina - 13 September 2007

SV, Buhdy has fallen for NPK’s dual personality. She is schitzo, or just rides whatever fence she feels will benefit her. DK is not going to give her a FP. Not enough titsnass from her. She got the bullying down pat, but she just wasn’t accepted into the club. She went after Buhdy fiecely when it was the thing to do on DK, but he survived. Same exact MO with Opol. But he survived also. So she changes position again. Had they been banned, she’d be troll-rating anyone who mentioned their names.

I don’t see Marisacat on the blogroll, but I will mention it to Buhdy, nor do I see Pff there. I asked him if his blog was given Kos’ blessing, if it was a place for Kossacks to let off steam about the Democrats, but still hold onto them. If you didn’t see it already, here is his answer:

LOL (4.00 / 1)
NO!
I am a flyspeck to kos!

I shook his hand at a meetup thingie….but other than that have had no interaction with him whatsoever.

I think my only ever direct comment to him was that DH was a troll in OPOL’s diaries, lol.

I am NOT an important person in kos’s sphere at ALL, lol.

As far as Armando, he has stated that he is only there to write and comment and wants no part of running the blog whatsoever.

I am the ONLY person who decides bannings and anything disciplinary besides immediate measures like hiding comments…and I discourage hiding comments as well.

by buhdydharma @ Thu Sep 13, 2007 at 12:05:16 PM PDT

81. ms_xeno - 13 September 2007

HC, no disrespect intended to Ms. Harvey.

It’s just that given Elise G. Harding’s own worship of vapidity and clothes, I’m convinced that she has a rather strong princess complex, which is understandable when a girl is ten but no so much in adulthood. Royalty, at any rate, receives what it requires by divine right, and hence has no need for something icky like, you know, real feminism that has some substance to it.

She is a good study, however. Note her gloating belief that the residents of this blog “have no place else to go.” That’s exactly what her patrons in the DP say about anyone to the Left of Hillary or the other Soups Du Jour in the larger political sphere. You have no place else to go. May the little Princess rise up far with the attitude that got bona-fide American royalty where it is today. She can always blame Mcat or the wrong color ensemble when it doesn’t work out to her satisfaction. :p

82. Revisionist - 13 September 2007

well he admits the site makes over 300K a year

“will spend over $300,000 of site revenues supporting the program”

83. Hair Club for Men - 13 September 2007

The shift to full-fledged US support for Israel came during LBJ’s administration,

Not coincidentally while the US military was bogged down in Vietnam and “we” needed a client in the region.

84. Hair Club for Men - 13 September 2007

Note her gloating belief that the residents of this blog “have no place else to go.”

http://youtube.com/watch?v=jZEXYFQZzGI

85. marisacat - 13 September 2007

82

that figure is low. mediagirl did the Dkos numbers from advertising 2 years ago, 600k +

NO ONE disputed it. If they wanted to, then was the time.

a defunk R site, Donkey Cons, later put it at 850k… now remember there was time he had more substantial advertising then he has had for months. (Should state here I have not looked at the FP in weeks).

Later I read in a trade pub he had crested over 1 M in advert dough/annum.

Now is there some “plumping” going on in his numbers, well sure.

But at the site they have always poor mouthed. During pie they claimed that was a 750/wk ad. At that time it was well over 2k/week.

So wile there advertising has been thin for months, it did used to be better.. and his income from ads was not insubstantial.

BTW, TPM has had higher ad rates then kos for a while.

Also some time ago Dkos began to make it hard to get to his advertising page on BlogAds with his rates. I remember having to search around to get it. No longer a direct link straight to it.

So I don’t know his ad rates for say the last 6, 8 months. Because I did not bother… plus his ads surely did drop off…

86. Hair Club for Men - 13 September 2007

BTW, TPM has had higher ad rates then kos for a while.

Ah Fitzmas. It was good for something after all.

87. Revisionist - 13 September 2007

he implies that Miss McSusaninMD are paid close 100K. Hell I would cut and paste for 30K

88. marisacat - 13 September 2007

HC

Fitzmas… I had not thought of that. You are likely right. And Josh, being the credentialed reporter with columns at other high profile sites, like the Hill, got the benefit. Certainly it did not seem that FDL saw a swell of any sort.

Not that I am crying for them, mind you… ;)

89. marisacat - 13 September 2007

he implies that Miss McSusaninMD are paid close 100K. — Rev

Nutty as a fucking fruitcake.

What a joke.

90. Marie - 13 September 2007

This Debat dude seems to be Glass, Jason Blair and Cooke all rolled into one and on the TV Raw Story.

I do so much enjoy stories about con-artists – and least the kind not in positions of power in the government or any institution. Always so interesting that they can pull them off so easily. Only unanswered question is if he was also on the payroll of the CIA/FBI/DOD/WH.

91. Marie - 13 September 2007

Re: McSusan – billmon is worth at least 100K. The rest of them should be paid by the word (a penny?) and nothing for the words in the cut and paste. On second thought, a penny might be on the high side.

Who does Kos think he is? Hearst? (Caught a glimpse of his triumphal entry at yearly Kos – and you are all correct, he looks like a low rent huckster.)

92. Madman in the Marketplace - 13 September 2007

Mr. Escobar is essential reading in these dark times. Thanks for the link.

93. Hair Club for Men - 13 September 2007

Yet, from the earliest days of this debacle all we’ve ever had to do was click our heels three times to be transported home.

I think you have to douse the wicked witch first.

94. Madman in the Marketplace - 13 September 2007

My guess is, “Sheik who?”

I’m betting he’s making jokes more in the line of:

“Hey, what does AQinI like for dinner?”

“Sheik and bake!”

95. Shadowthief - 13 September 2007

#81 Ms. Xeno–

I’ll be more impressed with Princess Elise when she’s employed.

96. Hair Club for Men - 13 September 2007

I’ll be more impressed with Princess Elise when she’s employed.

As soon as the Democrats take the White House, she’ll magically luck into a job as the Donatella Moss of the Hillary regime.

And Jane Hamsher can be CJ Cregg. And Kos can be Sam Seaborn and Atrios can be Josh Lyman and everybody gets a job in Washington and it will be all just like the Clinton 90s again except this time we’ll be in power and we’re never going to let that mean right-wing noise machine give us shit about a blow job again.

And hell, even David Brock’s on our side this time. Woo Hoo.

97. Madman in the Marketplace - 13 September 2007

If you really want to know what country Israel most resembles, it’s this one.

Except the Okinawans didn’t ask for it, unlike the Zionists, who were only too eager. I’m reading Blowback finally, and the chapter on Okinawa is horrifying.

98. Hair Club for Men - 13 September 2007

And the ONLY thing that can mess up our plans are those purity trolls who are hung up about little things like the war in Iraq and the Patriot Act and the Military Commissions Act.

Nerds. Geeks. Misfits. Get over it.

99. JJB - 13 September 2007

Shadowthief, no. 78,

I’m well aware of that, however I mentioned private funds from the US as being essential to Israel’s existence, both now and from the very beginning. And I think we can assume that this country was giving Israel a lot of under the table financial and material support through all sorts of channels, including aid that was supposedly coming from France. After all, the French couldn’t afford to pay for their war in Indochina or much of anything else, we were picking up at least 80% of the tab for that by 1953 at the latest.

For all that, they attacked the USS Liberty and killed dozens of US sailors.

100. Shadowthief - 13 September 2007

Re: DailyKos ad revenues.

Nobody knows, except by back-of-the-envelope calculations, because Moulitsas favours a level of secrecy regarding his finances that would do Dick Cheney proud.

However, we have some clue that not all is well in Kostopia:

First, Peeder’s caution after he left his position as a contracting programmer for DailyKos that the business model was not sustainable and that Kos was “burning through cash” with his own software development, etc.

Second, ads are going unsold, and it’s quite possible that Kos NEVER or rarely sold ads at the publicised rate. In other words, ask $9,000 a week for an advert but settle for $5,000. Negotiating advertising rates is a common practise, I’m told.

But I’ve long suspected that Kosolini gets a good deal of his money Armstrong Williams style: “pay for play”, in which certain Democratic Party sugar daddies pay Kos to see to it that certain issues and certain candidates get tended to. That Kosolini is dependent on those sources would certainly explain a great deal, if not everything, about the way he has conducted his business.

The most important thing to remember is DailyKos is NOT a movement nor is it the vehicle for anything but making a profit. DailyKos is a business, a capitalist enterprise first and foremost (either that, or a heavily subsidised propaganda outlet and ideological cattle chute for the blogging proles)–and all that is bad about it flows from that.

101. Madman in the Marketplace - 13 September 2007

I think we are comparable to Germany, , HCfM, only we built an entire economy on exploitation and slaughter:

Black Holocaust Museum

102. liberalcatnip - 13 September 2007

I hope to spin off the fellowship program into its own non-profit operation sooner, rather than later, hence making all contributions to it tax-deductible, as well as encouraging big donors to also put some money in.

And which “big donors” would that be?

He hands over 300k to just a handful of people and he’s still panhandling? Geez. He needs to figure out his ROI cuz it sure isn’t worth that much money.

103. cad - 13 September 2007

“I couldnt find the link…. but there were also some youger german police who caused a stir because they refused to attend a holocaust seminar as part of their training saying it was outdated, irrelevant and designed solely to make them feel guilty for something they had no part in that took place 30 years before they were born.”

30 years! ohmigod, that’s like totally ancient history. and it could never happen again anywhere, nevermind that holocaust survivor who spoke at a darfur rally i attended and couldn’t believe the world was sitting still for the genocide there.

hopefully american students will rise up to squash outdated us history of slavery and women’s rights.

104. Shadowthief - 13 September 2007

Oh, and not to dominate the thread with Kossola, but….

Back when Kos was still answering questions from peasants, I asked him point-blank if he accepted money from private donors (aka “sugar daddies”) or from candidates that he did not disclose.

Kos’ lawyerly answer was that he was NOT a political consultant.

My reply was that I did NOT ask if he was a consultant; I asked if he took money from campaigns or from Democratic Party patrons to support his fabulous lifestyle and fuel his blog–in other words, was he being paid to blog, not to consult?

Kos replied that he had already answered my question, etc.

And you know, I think he did. Some times an answer is not only what is said, but what is NOT said.

What Kos did NOT say and has never said, to my knowledge, is this:

I am not accepting, and have never accepted, payments from any individual or organisation to support my blogging. I am not accepting, and have never accepted, payments from any candidate or a candidate’s supporter(s) to influence my blogging.

And everybody who dares to ask him the question has been banished from his view.

105. Shadowthief - 13 September 2007

Btw Catnip, hope you’re on the mend :)

106. liberalcatnip - 13 September 2007

And Kos can be Sam Seaborn

How dare you insult (the handsome and talented) Rob Lowe like that!?

107. Revisionist - 13 September 2007

mcat is your email your name at aol?

108. liberalcatnip - 13 September 2007

Btw Catnip, hope you’re on the mend

Thanks. I manage to crawl out of bed for a few hours a day in which I then transpose my crankiness to the online venues. ;)

109. Shadowthief - 13 September 2007

You should be at DailyKos, then. Be sure to sneeze on a few of the Kops for us.

110. Madman in the Marketplace - 13 September 2007

I listened to Harry Reid give this whiny list of excuses for doing nothing on NPR tonight (sadly, the link has the wrong audio associated with it). Talked about how people don’t understand how the Donks are actually a minority in the Senate, what with Holy Joe selling out all the time (though Reid pushed that Lieberzionist stood with the Donks on ‘the majority of issues’ [paraphrasing]) on Iraq w/ the Republicans. Hell, since Tim Johnson got sick, the Republicans had a majority on Iraq of 50/49!!

Damn good thing he’s such a “fighter”.

111. Madman in the Marketplace - 13 September 2007

canned, spammed and packed in jelly.

112. Madman in the Marketplace - 13 September 2007

It’s not crankiness catnip! Like all good herbs, you add SPICE to the many tubes of the internets!

Oh, and HI BRINN (and Bay too)!!

BTW, if you watched Amy Goodman today, you saw the report on the huge event here in Milwaukee. Sadly, given the ownership of the local media by wingers, there was only this small, sad little story in the local paper, and believe me, it wasn’t highlighted.

I LIVE here, and I had no idea how big the turnout was until I saw it on Democracy Now.

113. liberalcatnip - 13 September 2007
114. Madman in the Marketplace - 13 September 2007

LOL

Politico’s Martin: “Is Code Pink to the left what the Westboro Baptist Church is to the right?”

In a September 10 blog entry, Politico senior political writer Jonathan Martin compared the anti-war group Code Pink: Women for Peace to the “virulently homophobic” Westboro Baptist Church (WBC), asking: “Is Code Pink to the left what the Westboro Baptist Church is to the right?” According to Martin, the groups are comparable because of their “bizarre tactics” that are “so self-defeating as to give credence to conspiracy theories that they’re not what they seem.”

SURE, protesting a war is EXACTLY the same as a bunch of wackjob homophobes!

115. Madman in the Marketplace - 13 September 2007

THIS is taking cosplay one step too far!

ALLEN PARK, Mich. — The body of a 41-year-old man was found in a wooded area next to a guillotine he built and used to kill himself, police said.

The man, from the Detroit suburb of Melvindale, was discovered

Monday by workers from a shopping center near his home.

Groundskeeper from the Fairlane Green shopping center at Outer and Fairlane drive discovered the body shortly before 11 a.m. Monday.

Allen Park Deputy Police Chief Dale Covert said the roughly six-foot tall guillotine was bolted to a tree and included a swing arm. Covert said police also found several store receipts detailing the materials used to assemble the device.

“I can’t even tell you how long it must have taken him to construct,” he said. “This man obviously was very determined to end his life.”

According to investigators, the man had to make several trips to carry the wooden and metal parts to the area in the woods.

Covert said the man lived within walking distance of the spot where he died.

Police said the man, whose identity police have not released, had been dead for two days.

The man did not leave a suicide note.

116. Madman in the Marketplace - 13 September 2007
117. marisacat - 13 September 2007

Revisionist

YES… Marisacat at aol dot com

**********

Moderation snagging “c”

2 from catnip … and

one from cad rescued.

Off to get Madman from Spam (sorry! to all)

118. Madman in the Marketplace - 13 September 2007

John Cole

General Petraeus came to DC, offered what is essentially fact-free testimony, and admitted in a fleeting moment of candor that he, like the rest of us, doesn’t think this war is making us any safer, the Democrats are pre-emptively rolling over and playing dead, the “surge” will continue on until it is physically impossible, and if you survey the blogosphere, it is the right that is angry- about an ad in a newspaper none of them fucking read anyway.

And I just don’t get it. What the hell do they have to be angry about? Other than immigration and social security, hasn’t Bush given them everything they wanted and demanded? What, exactly, have the defeatocrats stopped? Name one thing that has been denied Bush in his prosecution of this war. One dollar that wasn’t budgeted. Even today, at the height of the Democratic opposition, and the Bush administration is adhering consistently to the doctrine of “Doing Whatever the Fuck We Want.” The troops aren’t going anywhere until we don’t have enough troops. That isn’t a Democrat forced drawdown/withdrawal, it is a shortage of troops.

And so it is for everything, tax cuts, domestic policy, torture, surveillance, judicial picks- you name it. Bush has done whatever he wants, the right has supported him the whole way, and the opposition from ‘teh left’ can charitably be called inconsequential. Christ on a crutch, it took a beating at the polls (the only ones that count) to force Bush to accept Rumsfeld’s resignation, and Gonzales stayed on until he was literally the laughingstock of the legal world, both domestic and abroad. And does anyone want to place a bet that there will be little more than token opposition to Ted Olson as the next AG? Anyone?

So again- what are they so damned angry about? I don’t get it. I used to throw around the term the “angry left” myself, but watching this administration do whatever it wants to the cheerleading of imbeciles and first rate hacks, I am surprised the left is not angrier. Bush, the worst President of my lifetime and possible the last century, turned a 51% tightly fought election into a mandate, while the Democrats can’t figure out how to remove one god damned troop from Iraq with 60+% of the public furious about the war.

Again, I don’t get it. What are they so damned mad about? If they had to put up with the crap the left is putting up with, they would be burning cars in the street. If the roles were reversed, the right wouldn’t be pooling their money for an ad in the NY Times- they would burn the god damned building down after stoning the editorial board to death. And that is putting it mildly.

The left SHOULD be burning cars in the street, but we all know the cops would deal with that MUCH more harshly than they would blowing up, say, abortion clinics and gay nightclubs in “protest”, not to mention trying to enter a Senate hearing room w/ a lot of melanin in one’s skin.

Of course, angry leftists are ignoreded, abused by police with impunity, locked up in “free speech zones” by BOTH/THE political party(s).

Gonna take a meltdown.

119. liberalcatnip - 13 September 2007

Breaking news:

BTD quit, he didn’t get banned (0 / 0)

As for refunds, I give them to whoever asks, pro-rated for the amount of time they enjoyed them.

by kos on Thu Sep 13, 2007 at 02:53:33 PM MDT

120. lucid - 13 September 2007

About the new blog. Though I feel I would be compromising my integrity if I talked about it, I will say that I was invited to be an FP contributor, among other things, back in February. I was involved in discussions for about a month & then decided it was not for me when I learned a number of things.

Best of luck to them. But I don’t see it as being any different from Dkos.

121. marisacat - 13 September 2007

so…

is Juan Cole still advising the Democrats?

Cuz you gotta wonder.

I assume Krugman is, I had high hopes when Howell Raines brought him in, esp as his area of focus, just his own within economy and teaching, was boom and bust economies.. and that sure is our malady. And our addiction.

AND the ME… and war… and a few other things.

122. Madman in the Marketplace - 13 September 2007

George W. Nixon is just starting his speech lying …

how far we’ve fallen.

123. Madman in the Marketplace - 13 September 2007
124. lucid - 13 September 2007

MitM – I can’t even bear to watch it… I got to the ‘the local population was suffering under the Taliban like rule of Al queda and asked us for help’ line and almost threw the remote through the television… Switched over to ‘The Cooler’ on IFC… nothing on tonight [and I don't think I can handle watching the injured soldier doc on HBO]… time to make some dinner.

125. JJB - 13 September 2007

I knew this:

BTD quit, he didn’t get banned

I mean, if you don’t know that, you also probably don’t know that Stalin didn’t have Trotsky murdered, the latter committed suicide and the only thing he could find to do it with was that pickaxe, and he smashed it into the back of his skull because he also had an itch back there and figured he’d skill two birds with one stone while killing himself with the mountain-climbing tool.

Oil topped the $80 a barrel mark today. Fortunately, I bought a few barrels last week at a far lower price, and the home refinery I got for a song (Hoagy Carmichael’s “Stardust,” if you must know) on Ebay will enable me to run my car on gas much cheaper than that available to the average consumer for the next few months. So I won’t be suffering from any Pump Shock anytime soon!

126. Madman in the Marketplace - 13 September 2007

lucid

I don’t know why I’m torturing myself. I guess it’s like seeing a car crash, or watching a loved one taking his last breath. I don’t know. I guess I like to know/see what the so-called opposition party WON’T stand up to, the pathetic bullying paper tiger who has shredded the last illusions of the promise of the so-called American dream.

A third of this nation still support a draft-dodging, lying, drunkard cokehead who thinks the law doesn’t apply to him, and the rest of the ruling class is eager to prove him right. I guess I feel an obligation to pay witness … I’ve been looking away from so much lately, out of exhaustion with the whole mess, out of grief, out of shame … I guess I feel I have to at least watch these little touchstones, these moments when Dear Leader steps before the bright lights to reinforce his regime.

I watch him, watch the kabuki theater of him “accepting” the recommendations of the sullied honor of an officer who parroted the words of his dictator, and know that the lie in “all men are created equal” proclaimed by a group of men who owned slaves has finally been made fully manifest, that any pretense of some hope of progress and decency and actual progressive embracing of the future has been fully abandoned.

It’s like watching a public execution, another headman chopping off another dream at the neck.

I’m looking away much of the time these days … but sometimes I just can’t.

127. liberalcatnip - 13 September 2007

President Strawman rides again.

128. Madman in the Marketplace - 13 September 2007
129. Madman in the Marketplace - 13 September 2007
130. Sabrina - 13 September 2007

According to the news, George W. Bush will accept the recommendations of General Petraeus! They lie with impunity.

Re Kos ‘Armando wasn’t banned’ – so Armando is a liar?

I was glad to see this question, someone else remembered what he said in the past about subscriptions. I do remember well, kos dismissing the ‘community’ donations. Airc, he said that people should not buy the subscriptions and turn off the ads because that would affect his ad revenue. So now he doesn’t care about that! The man changes his mind on just about everything so fast, it’s just impossible to keep up.

Q. You said before that you didn’t care if people subscribed or not. Now you do?

I want people to do what feels good to them, what they’re comfortable doing. No one needs to do anything. In the past, site subscriptions went to the site’s general revenue fund. And since there was more than enough money to run the operation (see “healthy profit margins” above), it wasn’t something I needed to push. But now that I am completely in love with with the fellowship program and eager to expand it, the subscriptions are more important.

I hope to spin off the fellowship program into its own non-profit operation sooner, rather than later, hence making all contributions to it tax-deductible, as well as encouraging big donors to also put some money in.

Changed his mind about subscriptions, and changed his mind about whether or not Armando was banned. I wonder what Armando will say, since he has insisted he was banned, many times. I suppose in order to bring him back without facing a rebellion over all the others who were banned, it’s better to say he was not banned.

Lucid, I can’t watch Bush either. I got over that for a while, but just can’t listen to him lie tonight. Too exhausted from all the lies they told this week, and the knowledge that he will get what he asks for. H

Re the other site, I had seen a discussion about it on TL about a month ago. Btd asked when it was starting up. First I had heard of it. But I always wondered why they didn’t start their own site, those with a big following who were getting a lot of crap from the troll patrol.

131. Revisionist - 13 September 2007

huckabee gets scarier by the day

132. Madman in the Marketplace - 13 September 2007
133. Madman in the Marketplace - 13 September 2007

Huckabee is gonna be the nominee, if it isn’t Romney (and I don’t see the wingers voting for a Mormon), so you better get used to him.

134. Revisionist - 13 September 2007

brian willians said bush mentioned 3 bases at the pre speech lunch all the reporters go to but cant talk about

135. marisacat - 13 September 2007

the media likes Huckabee…

Yeah I so want a Babtist minister in the WH. vs some fake, but right wing, Methodist nun

136. lucid - 13 September 2007

SB – apparently there had been talk of it for quite a while within certain circles. Formal planning & recruiting started in February.

137. liberalcatnip - 13 September 2007

What’s with the John Edwards infomercial?

138. marisacat - 13 September 2007

134

they hardly talk about the ones they CAN go to.

I nearly keeled over the side of the bed and upchucked, one am on Wash Journal (so 4 am here) the father of a dead soldier was just back from Iraq (he supports The Great Effort)… and almost licked his chops talking about the food line at one of the big bases, like Camp Victory.

He said his choice was lobster or standing rib roast.

His son was DEAD.

putrid people.

139. Revisionist - 13 September 2007

sorry im watching msnbc… huck was on talking about honor and what not… he sold it better than bush did.. biden was on the other side.. did a decent job… msnbc is — aside from brian williams — is saying the presdent is nuts and is hunkering in

140. marisacat - 13 September 2007

oh you know wanting ArmandoFernandoBigTentoramapoiuynick and whoever else he has been, required extensive discussion. MONTHS of online meetings… catered luncheons.. ohone calls, emails, details, boundaries…

etc.

I see Jay Elias has a personal manifesto up.

I did not open it…

LOL

141. Revisionist - 13 September 2007

Keith O wonders why Ewdards spent on that money on an ad when he could have come on come on any of the news nets for free

142. CSTAR - 13 September 2007

MitM: Comment motivated by two of your posts 126 & 129.

One of the things that really upset me about the use of language on dkos (and many of the liberal blogs such as MLW) was the (in my view) reactionary use of sexual language. One of the offensive terms is “whore”: in my opinion, progressives should not use that word, since most women turn to prostitution out of economic necessity and even if they freely chose it (as Belle de Jour makes us want to believe) it denigrates women. The other term that is much dragged through the gutter by almost everybody is masturbation. This or that activity is referred to as “masturbation” because supposedly, it is ineffectual or self indulgent. This is a particularly serious misuse of language because it questions the sexuality of adolescents who go through periods of experimentation and confusion

Instead of considering masturbation as something to be avoided, we should seriously propose it as a healthier alternative than listening to Bush, which is more like self-flagellation, definitely not good for one’s health (or reading some of the posts on Dkos for that matter). I really believe Clinton blew it when he fired Jocelyn Elders as Surgeon General. I would be better off following this advice myself.

Please forgive me if these comments are too outrageous (or in fact a bit odd) I don’t mean to be preachy but why should we torture ourselves?

143. supervixen - 13 September 2007

114, MitM: Well of course many so-called “leftists/liberals/progressives” hate Code Pink even more than they hate Phelps et al. because secretly they’re homophobes too, and the spectacle of angry screaming women makes their testicles disappear.

120, lucid: you chose right

144. supervixen - 13 September 2007

I have to say that “Docudharma” banner logo is truly hideous and ill-conceived.

145. Madman in the Marketplace - 13 September 2007

Oh, I see what you mean, CSTAR. Good points all (though I have to admit that I chuckled when you used “blew it” and “Clinton” in the same sentence, but I am a child of my culture).

Our whole culture is about denying our WHOLE nature, especially our sexual natures. It’s sick and life-denying.

Anyway, I watch Bush, I watch TV, because I think I can’t understand what is going on, or argue against it, unless I experience it. I am OF this culture. I love violent movies, I play violent video games, I embrace violent stories … because I recognize that it is part of who I am, and Bush is a reflection of my culture, my upbringing, part of what made me who I am. It is, however, MY choice of how to respond to the monstrosity that is our current course … I would never tell others that they should react as I do.

I am a humanist. I think we would be better served if we absorbed, looked at, embraced human behavior in ALL of its forms (no matter how disturbing) … if we confront that we create our selves, create our values, create our environments … it’s what we are. We are, in a sense, gods (small “g”) … we invent value and warp the environment. The fact that we fob this fact, this RESPONSIBILITY, off on imaginary friends reflects poorly on us.

Bush (and Reagan and Nixon before him) are part an parcel of American social development, they are the natural outcome of a culture that grew upon self-serving lies.

I watched him b/c I feel an obligation to look in the mirror from time to time. I perfectly understand that other people wouldn’t.

146. liberalcatnip - 13 September 2007

Some businessman:

question: would the site make any extra money (0 / 0)

if we start clicking on the ads?

by homerun on Thu Sep 13, 2007 at 02:17:40 PM MDT

*
It’s best (3+ / 0-)

Recommended by:
AndyT, Spathiphyllum, Naniboujou

if people click on ads because they want to see what the advertiser has to say.

Otherwise, it’s not fair to them. And given that they’re supporting this site, I think it’s important to treat them with respect.

by kos on Thu Sep 13, 2007 at 02:39:09 PM MDT

Cluelessness abounds.

147. CSTAR - 13 September 2007

MitM

Oops, blew it, yeah I missed that one.

I simply can’t listen to Bush (or Cheney or Ohlmert etc). For me it’s too self-destructive leading to bouts of rage. And though I would like to do something to avoid the cataclysm that I see coming, I need to first find a way of controlling my rage. That state of wisdom eludes me.

148. liberalcatnip - 13 September 2007

CSTAR,

I don’t have a problem with using a phrase like “mental masturbation” ie, someone pontificating intellectually so they can get their jollies off. Happens all the time and I don’t believe it denigrates the practice of masturbation.

And, afaic, “attention whores” can be members if either sex as can “political whores” – those who choose to sell themselves to the highest bidder. That’s not a reflection of the problems inherent with prostitution in broader society (drug addiction, poverty etc). I’m talking about people who knowingly make the choice to set themselves up as pawns for some greater cause because they’ve decided the payoff is worth more than their integrity – like Rove, for example.

149. Madman in the Marketplace - 13 September 2007

After I watch, I cheer myself up with Johnny Cash and songs like this Dixie Chicks song.

150. supervixen - 13 September 2007

134, MCat: lobster or standing rib roast

That reminds me of the scene from that remake of On the Beach in which the sub captain (Armand Assante) orders that his cooks break out the filet mignon and beer and put on a big party for his doomed crew.

Yeah, the world is coming to an end and we’re trying to outrun a massive radiation cloud, so let’s party!

Actually it’s not such a bad idea.

Speaking of food, I ran across this great food/recipe blog the other day : The Old Foodie.

151. Madman in the Marketplace - 13 September 2007

Bush upsets me less than the donks … getting mad at him is like raging at the tiger as it sinks its teeth into your neck. He and his people are my enemy, they are predators, dangerous to what I hold dear. What upsets me is fakes who claim to stand with me as they do nothing, no matter what tools are handed to them.

I am far more likely to go into a rage when watching Biden or Clinton or Reid … Bush I expect to do evil and nasty things, but the fact that I have little or no institutional outlet for resistance to his evil because of people like them makes me want to hit something.

152. CSTAR - 13 September 2007

MitM

Intellectually, you’re right. But maybe I’m too primordial. I still get mad at the tiger. Americans that know me call it my “latin temperament”; what that trait has to do with latin beats me (other than some association with Ricky Ricardo in I Love Lucy, who apparently was pretty volatile); in my opinion, it’s the part of my temperament which is most unlatin.

153. marisacat - 13 September 2007

ugh unfortunately I was able to listen to Bush with more ease than Jack Reed.

gah. my mind drifted and admittedly I was cleaning up cat spittle (mostly water)… but for Reed’s sake (not that it matters) the synopsis from Russert, WIlliams and “Stretch” was deadly:

The Dems want to change the war, but don’t know how, short of shutting DC and blocking the funds.

uh… and that would be so wrong? Can’t stop the lobster to forward operating bases.

[I do agree about 'blow it to the winds' when you know the screw is fully in. As SIlber says, he plans to fuck wildly and drink...

LOL]

****************

new thread:

LINK

154. Sabrina - 13 September 2007

Well, CSTAR, I’m not not latin, and it is for the same reason that most of the time I have to avoid watching Bush. It was much worse after he ‘won’ the 2004 election though. I thought maybe I needed therapy or something. I was afraid to even flip the channels in case I might catch a glimpse of him, or hear his gloating voice. ‘I have political capital and I intend to use it’! And his admonition to reporters ‘you get ONE question, got it? No follow-ups’! I swear, I hate violence but I was seriously worried about how I felt the day after they handed him another election.

I felt a lot better when other normally perfectly rational people told me they felt the same way, some even cancelling their cable subscriptions to avoid even the possibility of seeing him. I can handle it better now, partly because he doesn’t look so smug anymore. But, I agree with you if there’s a choice, masturbation definitely is way more appealing.

I do understand Mitm. And give you much credit. Someone has to do it and we do need to know what he’s saying.

155. supervixen - 13 September 2007

151, Madman: I am far more likely to go into a rage when watching Biden or Clinton or Reid … Bush I expect to do evil and nasty things

Absolutely. It’s like the way Red Sox fans hate the Yankees but become truly enraged about their own players, guys like Mike Torrez and Bill Buckner, who happened to be instrumental in their losing. Of course Torrez, Buckner et al were not doing anything evil or nasty, they were trying to do their level best and the breaks went against them. The same cannot be said for the Democrats.

156. Marie - 13 September 2007

#149 MitM — thank you, thank you. I adore the Dixie Chicks and “Not Ready to Make Nice” makes me feel alive. Those three threw it all away to be real and not for one minute considered backing down or splitting up. God, it’s inspiring to see that adversity can lead to a creative breakthrough and success.


Sorry comments are closed for this entry