jump to navigation

Have a laugh… 15 March 2008

Posted by marisacat in 2008 Election, DC Politics, Lie Down Fall Down Dems, WAR!.
trackback

    

I was remembering just about this time of year, in 1988… I had lunch downtown with a friend, we had been speaking of the Democrats and the election.. As we clinked glasses I said if the filly managed to win the Derby, then maybe there was a chance for the Democrats.  Oh slap me silly, surely I am a sexist.  Something… ;)

Studying chicken entrails might have been more illuminating (if greasy).  Winning Colors, a roan filly, the third in history to win the Derby, pulled it out.  Dukakis did not.

Who the hell knows.  I do know I am well over cringing for or about the Democrats… wondering, wishing, willing them to manage somethinganything.  I may not like what I see, but I have accepted it. What a fucking relief!  What we have, what is running, is it. The whining and utter failure of the 110th, the sloth, greed and sell outs of the 109th, 108th, 107th, etc., is what they are… Their lameness does still piss me off, just because it is so, well, lame.

Always did hate feet of clay –  to the hips.  There will always be small things to champion… another muslim to the House, for one.

Not sure anyone can stand it, and Crowley does come off as naive but as TNR is more or less in the tank for Obama the take on Wright contretemps is worth something.  And, the thread is interesting, note the first comment, Geraldine is a dessicated old hag and a criminal.  Well! we did need to complete cunt whore and whatever else.

One thing, whoever wins this muddy track is not going to be dressed in a blanket of celebration roses, come November.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I looked in at BAR, as they did not publish this week… but thru one of the links in their blogroll did land on some commentary from Angela Davis on the race, on race and on US prisons (additional quotes at the site’s blog) and this and that….

When the 1970s Black Power icon was asked for her “Black feminist critique” of the Democratic presidential campaign, Davis said she was pleased that there is now a Black man and a White woman who are serious contenders for the presidency. However, she cautioned people not to place all their hopes in either Senators Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama or in any one candidate.

“I think we have a messiah complex in this country,” she asserted. “We need an individual upon whom we can confer our own power…I am concerned that we might all go back to our individual lives after the election and assume that whoever is elected gets to carry the ball from then on. And I remember what happened when Bill Clinton was elected…I remember that there were fewer collective movement manifestations during the Clinton years than there were during the previous Bush years. And it seems to me that if we elect someone who’s halfway progressive, that’s when we really have to put the pressure on…”

“We don’t need to hand over our collective potential, our power,” she concluded. “We can’t hand it over to any one individual. Let’s keep that for ourselves.”

… and this from the blog link:

• “…During the course of the current election campaign, when Hillary [Clinton] and [Barack] Obama got into it around Dr. [Martin Luther] King and [President] Lyndon Johnson and who was really responsible for [civil rights], the media described it as a ‘ruckus over race.’ It’s as if the very mention of race brings chaos upon us. And of course, we are urged to imagine racial equality as ‘colorblindness.’ So what happens is that we’re told to repress all of this stuff about race that is a part of our collective history, our personal history. We cannot talk about it, and in general whatever is repressed emerges somehow or another, sometimes when you least expect it.”

• On being placed on the Ten Most Wanted List in 1970: “It wasn’t about me…a lot of women [tell me] ‘I was arrested when they were looking for you!’ I have met at least 5,000 women who told me that they were stopped or they were arrested while I was underground and they were looking for me. What that says to me is that it was not about me as an individual…it was something that was used to terrorize people in this country, particularly those people who wanted to fight for a better world, and particularly women, and particularly Black women… Therefore, the victory wasn’t about me: it was a people’s victory. It was an indication of what is possible when people come together and dedicate themselves to struggling for justice and equality.”

**********************************************************************

Comments

1. bayprairie - 15 March 2008

great links in the last thread to paterson, nyco. new york gained something in the new governorship, at least it appears so on that brief read. i liked the horse racing story, and the dna info, and his thoughts on race. segment three especially.

on the upside he briefly mentions curtis mayfield as an influence, who i think is to die for and whos albums i always have an eye open for. (hat tip to ms-xeno who clued me in to the fact that curtis’s dad was percy mayfield, i’d never made that connection)

a little tidbit. mayfield tuned his guitar to the black keys on the piano. open F# tuning. i don’t know of anyone else who did, or does, that.

good luck trying to play it that way!

and imho angela davis is spot on.

2. liberalcatnip - 15 March 2008

Khadr team wins a small victory; Judge says defence can question U.S. commander who changed report about Afghanistan firefight

3. melvin - 15 March 2008

Comforting to find that Angela Davis at least still has her wits about her.

The Ferarro thing just ain’t pretty from any angle. You have the supposedly progressive (yeah I know) Air America hosts referring to her as a “sour old bitch.”

Just take Angela one step further. We pin so damn much on this quadrennial popularity contest, including how many millions of dollars. Just one more distraction from reality.

4. rif - 15 March 2008

I found it, Marisa. On his website click on People, then Women’s Auxiliary, oops I meant Women, then to the right on Learn. Scroll down.

In other words, it is in the last filing cabinet on the right, bottom drawer, towards the back, filed under “Weak” or perhaps “Mealymouthed”.

http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/womenissues

REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE
Supports a Woman’s Right to Choose:
Barack Obama understands that abortion is a divisive issue, and respects those who disagree with him. However, he has been a consistent champion of reproductive choice and will make preserving women’s rights under Roe v. Wade a priority as President. He opposes any constitutional amendment to overturn the Supreme Court’s decision in that case.

Preventing Unwanted Pregnancy:
Barack Obama is an original co-sponsor of legislation to expand access to contraception, health information and preventive services to help reduce unintended pregnancies. Introduced in January 2007, the Prevention First Act will increase funding for family planning and comprehensive sex education that teaches both abstinence and safe sex methods. The Act will also end insurance discrimination against contraception, improve awareness about emergency contraception, and provide compassionate assistance to rape victims.

5. liberalcatnip - 15 March 2008

ko calls the whambulance:

I don’t like it when this website gets reported in the national press in a way that mischaracterizes the dailykos that all of us know. I’m sure you don’t either.

Pretty damn funny that the title of his diary is “spin vs authenticity”.

6. rif - 15 March 2008

Is my comment in spam? or was it sucked into a WP vortex?

7. liberalcatnip - 15 March 2008

“I think we have a messiah complex in this country,” she asserted. “We need an individual upon whom we can confer our own power…I am concerned that we might all go back to our individual lives after the election and assume that whoever is elected gets to carry the ball from then on.

That’s exactly what I was talking about when I referred to messiah politics. Hell, too many Obama supporters still seem to think they’re part of some social “movement” when the only “movement” they’re involved in is the one led by Obama to get them to the polls to vote for him so he can win.

8. liberalcatnip - 15 March 2008

rif,

Beware the WP vortex. It sucks and blows.

9. marisacat - 15 March 2008

rif…

SORRY! WP sent you to spam.

Thanks for finding it. Geesh.

10. melvin - 15 March 2008

7 Is that a reference to the “HRC sucks and blows” or whatever it was diary at Outer Mamzolia? The response was a perfect demonstration of the Mrs. Grundy attitude over there. Change the title!! Offensive!! Wonder why your site is having problems when you have made it about nothing but appearances? One longs for an honest response, even if it was “eat my crusty shorts bitch”, anything but this oh my, how awful, someone left a turd on the table.

The site about nothing, with Chance Gardener at the helm. At least the Seinfeld version was funny, 15 years ago, and he had the sense to quit before it got old.

11. melvin - 15 March 2008

8, rather. Innumerate along with my other shortcomings..

12. marisacat - 15 March 2008

Naybe if we just unbury RFK all our problems will be over.

From invoking him while sweeping Wright off stage left, saying ‘I knew nothing!’ to abortion is ‘divisive’. No, fucking religion is divisive.

Somehow that is in the same drawer with all the names Ferraro was called. Is being called.

13. liberalcatnip - 15 March 2008

Is that a reference to the “HRC sucks and blows” or whatever it was diary at Outer Mamzolia?

Outer Mamzolia. lol

No, I use “sucks and blows” when the opportunity arises – not just in reference to Hillary. ;)

14. marisacat - 15 March 2008

melvin

we must be in Teh Boring Times. I have been seeing this:

God [expletive] America!

What? Ridiculous. jsut live iwth it. He said it, live with it! And if Pastor Wright used “nigger” then PRINT IT OUT!

Whiney wusses. Scared idiots.

LOL Just saw this at IOZ

15. cad - 15 March 2008

Oh no.

Obama went on FOX news.

I await the kos koncern trolls to protest…

Waiting…

Waiting…

16. cad - 15 March 2008

Wait, here’s a diary calling the kos kops out, and watch how the smug hypocrites bend over to justify Obama’s appearance. They’re so pathetic it’s scary.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/3/16/15041/2828/208/477776

17. liberalcatnip - 15 March 2008

I await the kos koncern trolls to protest…

Before he went on Hannity’s show on Friday nite, over at Daily Obama they were spinning it as Obamalama beating FAUX at their own game (of course). But they’re not quite so nice about the Clintons doing the same thing. I know, I know…quel surprise!

Obama gets pre-emptive forgiveness.

18. melvin - 15 March 2008

14 Thing is, that [expletive] business makes it so much more scary, the horror that can’t be named! Really, it’s an ad trick, from old Lovecraft. It leaves all sorts of horrible possibilities open in the mind; did he say, God fuck America? God sodomize America, with a mythological 15 inch black penis? He might have (as far as I know) as long as it isn’t specified further.

19. marisacat - 15 March 2008

I have seen Ferraro’s FOX contract thrown at her too. Fox slag or whatever they used.

So old.

They needed someone other than Bush to hate and inserted, for all her known faults AND THEN SOME, Hillary – and any middle aged woman as stand in.

So transparent. God forbid they orchestrate some real anger at the congress and the party and the fucked elections apparatus, as a whole.

20. marisacat - 15 March 2008

18

I know, ain’t it a HOOT!?

21. melvin - 15 March 2008

19 Well I’m just waiting for markos Chevron moulitsas to mention the Fox connection on his DailyChevronKos website. Not that anyone will notice. Talk about whores, look at the whore in the mirror.

22. marisacat - 15 March 2008

when I was kicking around for links on Obama and Wright, I landed on this. At least a little off the beaten path.

23. cad - 15 March 2008

Sad deluded kossacks spinning their own hypocrisy:

So your use of words like “histrionic” and “apoplectic” seem strangly out of place.

Perhaps, you are thinking of a different website?

Are you trying to stir something up?

We are focusing here on advancing our primary nomination process and electing as many worthy Democrats as possible on the down-ballot races as possible.

In that regard, Senator Obama’s successful appearences on Fox, and the many other networks, was a wise decision that has contributed positively towards clarifying any confusion that might have arisen about his repudiation of Reverend Wrights remarks.

24. liberalcatnip - 15 March 2008

Batton down the hatches…big storm brewing: Clinton campaign wants Texas to postpone party conventions

25. melvin - 16 March 2008

24 That should blow the lid off.

Anyone remember the old Baba Wawa routine about what kind of tree would you be? Following up on Geraldine, I would like to see the interviewer ask America’s BO “If you could be a white woman, what white woman would you like to be?”

26. rif - 16 March 2008

25 It’s already a clusterfuck.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/5621618.html

Just in case anyone needs a new pair: http://www.operaglasses.com/

:)

27. marisacat - 16 March 2008

I read the other day that at the BO site, they claim both TX and NV as wins. I had meant to look for that today, when it kept crashing on me…

LOL. Even tho the NV DP said no delegates were awarded at the time of the caucuses (I assume he is using the misreported delegate count at the time..) what he bases TX on, not sure.

Last I read NV caucuses, the next ones to support delegates to the state convention were in turmoil.

Give it a break.

He and she are well matched frankly. Maniacs.

28. marisacat - 16 March 2008

melvin… LOL

I think the LAST thing he would want to be is a white woman. Endless daddy search is a big tip off, imo. I know, so Fristian.

29. marisacat - 16 March 2008

Tibet unrest rises to 80, just saw the BBC news alert email…

30. marisacat - 16 March 2008

Wall Street fears for next Great Depression

By Margareta Pagano, Business Editor

Sunday, 16 March 2008

Wall Street is bracing itself for another week of roller-coaster trading after more than $300bn (£150bn) was wiped off the US equity markets on Friday following the emergency funding package put together by the Federal Reserve and JPMorgan Chase to rescue Bear Stearns.

One UK economist warned that the world is now close to a 1930s-like Great Depression, while New York traders said they had never experienced such fear. The Fed’s emergency funding procedure was first used in the Depression and has rarely been used since.

A Goldman Sachs trader in New York said: “Everyone is in a total state of shock, aghast at what is happening. No one wants to talk, let alone deal; we’re just standing by waiting. Everyone is nervous about what is going to emerge when trading starts tomorrow.” ::snip snappy::

uh, try not to jump?

31. marisacat - 16 March 2008

hmm Apparently the Blahggers can indeed get dumber.

32. XP - 16 March 2008

re: the Texas clusterfuck

It has how the caucus system is set up. Since delegates can change their mind. Word on the street, depending with camp controlled the precinct caucus, folks are claiming people are trying to cheat the system by stacking the deck with replacement delegates who never attended the precinct caucus in favor of their candidate. In other words, they are kicking out folks who were elected by their peers and replacing them with others who are more familiar with this so-called “Texas Two-Step” process. While the chronicle is repeating the nasty rumor that Obama supporter would do not show up for the county/State conventions because they normally wouldn’t be active in the political process, the rumblings are not only are they being replaced but so are Clinton delegates. I am sure the Obama camp are making the same claim too.

And that is just half the story. LULAC is wanting to sue the Texas Democratic Party because they are stating that the delegate process “disenfranchises” the border counties. Their argument is that the Primary allocates delegates based on turnout of the previous election, a vote for delegates in San Antonio or south Texas is actually worth less than a vote out of Houston or Dallas. And remember, Houston is the 4th largest city in the US, so, no matter how intense the Dems can be on get out to vote during the general elections, they will never reach the same number of voters in Houston/Harris County nor Dallas/Ft. Worth.

I have my pair of opera glasses, but where I am sitting, it is easier to duck and cover.

33. Miss Devore - 16 March 2008

22. great article.

34. Madman in the Marketplace - 16 March 2008

A Goldman Sachs trader in New York said: “Everyone is in a total state of shock, aghast at what is happening. No one wants to talk, let alone deal; we’re just standing by waiting. Everyone is nervous about what is going to emerge when trading starts tomorrow.”

Oh, bullshit. They just thought they could get away with it. They COUNTED on it happening to little people on an individual basis. They’re bullshit financial “products” have built into their business plans a certain “acceptable” number of little individual depressions, families devastated, all built on the marketing of hope and ever-expanding possibility for “growth”.

I remember getting a briefing on a REIT (Real Estate Investment Trust) Mutual Fund a year or so ago. I looked through the prospectus, listened to the description of what it invested in, and said to the person, “this is a Ponzi scheme.” She just blinked at me. I’m no financial genius, but …

Those fucking traders are all full of shit. They just thought that they would get away with it. The grift is coming home, that’s all.

35. NYCO - 16 March 2008

Thanks… apologies for the periodic Paterson information dumps but everyone in the whole state is trying to quickly do their homework on the guy. (I only knew him well enough to feel disappointed when Spitzer tapped him for the useless position of Lt Gov; I really wanted him to stay in the state Senate where he could do more good… or so I thought!) It is also of interest, I feel, because Paterson is a black politician and that seems a relevant subject vis a vis the national election. If I come across links that seem relevant I will share them.

Here is my take. Paterson seems to be the real deal, and real because he is the product of an establishment. One particular branch of the black political establishment in America, a quite venerable one that is more than ready for prime time at this point. We’ll see. I am quite hopeful though am not expecting miracles.

A lot of people are comparing him to Obama as if they fall into the same category, but I don’t think they really do. Obama is all about non-establishment politics and The Great Global Melting Pot and new paradigms; Paterson is a product of the traditional racial/ethnic political divides in this country – although, I feel, a very modern product.

He’s also not afraid to talk about peak oil – although he probably could get away with more frankness when he was Lt Guv.

http://www.oilism.com/oil/2008/03/15/david-paterson-first-openly-peak-oil-aware-governor/

36. Madman in the Marketplace - 16 March 2008

The TNR thing you linked to Marisa is telling:

The second issue is how we should feel, normatively, about the fact that Obama maintained ties with Wright, even after presumably realizing that he held views Obama now calls deplorable. I’m not prepared to render judgment on that here. But I do worry that this lays bare a very grim truth: That even middle-class black American culture is more angry and alienated than most whites understand, and that our country is simply not yet at the point where even an ostensibly post-racial black candidate can escape that dynamic entirely.

WHY SHOULD THEY HAVE TO? Why would it be DESIRABLE for them to “escape” it? Why the fuck is it a surprise?!?!

Why can’t this country just FACE what it is? I didn’t hear one thing in the Wright excerpts that everyone is so horrified by that was unexpected or that I hadn’t heard before. Even the AIDS conspiracy theory is old news.

37. NYCO - 16 March 2008

Angela Davis: ““I think we have a messiah complex in this country,” she asserted. “We need an individual upon whom we can confer our own power…I am concerned that we might all go back to our individual lives after the election and assume that whoever is elected gets to carry the ball from then on.

Yep.

See: Spitzer, Eliot.

38. Madman in the Marketplace - 16 March 2008

Thanks for the “Obama and Me” link. Interesting reading.

39. NYCO - 16 March 2008

Has anyone noticed the recent proliferation of “fantasy baseball” posts on DK lately?

I guess in times of extreme stress, the site reverts back to its primitive state…

40. Madman in the Marketplace - 16 March 2008

Supreme Court Inc.

Conrad was in an understandably cheerful mood. Though the current Supreme Court has a well-earned reputation for divisiveness, it has been surprisingly united in cases affecting business interests. Of the 30 business cases last term, 22 were decided unanimously, or with only one or two dissenting votes. Conrad said she was especially pleased that several of the most important decisions were written by liberal justices, speaking for liberal and conservative colleagues alike. In opinions last term, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and David Souter each went out of his or her way to question the use of lawsuits to challenge corporate wrongdoing — a strategy championed by progressive groups like Public Citizen but routinely denounced by conservatives as “regulation by litigation.” Conrad reeled off some of her favorite moments: “Justice Ginsburg talked about how ‘private-securities fraud actions, if not adequately contained, can be employed abusively.’ Justice Breyer had a wonderful quote about how Congress was trying to ‘weed out unmeritorious securities lawsuits.’ Justice Souter talked about how the threat of litigation ‘will push cost-conscious defendants to settle.’ ”

Examples like these point to an ideological sea change on the Supreme Court. A generation ago, progressive and consumer groups petitioning the court could count on favorable majority opinions written by justices who viewed big business with skepticism — or even outright prejudice. An economic populist like William O. Douglas, the former New Deal crusader who served on the court from 1939 to 1975, once unapologetically announced that he was “ready to bend the law in favor of the environment and against the corporations.”

Today, however, there are no economic populists on the court, even on the liberal wing. And ever since John Roberts was appointed chief justice in 2005, the court has seemed only more receptive to business concerns. Forty percent of the cases the court heard last term involved business interests, up from around 30 percent in recent years. While the Rehnquist Court heard less than one antitrust decision a year, on average, between 1988 and 2003, the Roberts Court has heard seven in its first two terms — and all of them were decided in favor of the corporate defendants.

The people have no institutional defenders anymore.

41. Madman in the Marketplace - 16 March 2008

What should we make of the Supreme Court’s transformation? Throughout its history, the court has tended to issue opinions, in areas from free speech to gender equality, that reflect or consolidate a social consensus. With their pro-business jurisprudence, the justices may be capturing an emerging spirit of agreement among liberal and conservative elites about the value of free markets. Among the professional classes, many Democrats and Republicans, whatever their other disagreements, have come to share a relatively laissez-faire, technocratic vision of the economy and are suspicious of excessive regulation and reflexive efforts to vilify big business. Judges, lawyers and law professors (such as myself) drilled in cost-benefit analysis over the past three decades, are no exception. It should come as little surprise that John Roberts and Stephen Breyer, both of whom studied the economic analysis of law at Harvard, have similar instincts in business cases.

This elite consensus, however, is not necessarily shared by the country as a whole. If anything, America may be entering something of a populist moment. If you combine the groups of Americans in a recent Pew survey who lean toward some strain of economic populism — from disaffected and conservative Democrats to traditional liberals to social and big-government conservatives — at least two-thirds of all voters arguably feel sympathy for government intervention in the economy. Could it be, then, that the court is reflecting an elite consensus while contravening the sentiments of most Americans? Only history will ultimately make this clear. One thing, however, is certain already: the transformation of the court was no accident. It represents the culmination of a carefully planned, behind-the-scenes campaign over several decades to change not only the courts but also the country’s political culture.

42. Madman in the Marketplace - 16 March 2008

Perrin:

Jeremiah Wright’s supposedly inflammatory statements about 9/11 and the ongoing specter of racism are uncontroversial to those following the real world. We live in horrific, corrupt times, and while I don’t agree with everything Wright says, he’s certainly not speaking fiction, primarily when it comes to American foreign policy. We are hated not so much for our freedoms, such as they are, but specifically for our mass murder, our torture, our occupations. There are other, cultural elements that are part of the overall mix, yet they are doubtless secondary to those seeking refuge from our cluster bombs and client armies. Wright’s sermons about reaping what you sow is nothing new, especially in the Christian tradition. But to hear cable chatters and assorted reactionaries tell it, such time-honored concepts don’t apply to the United States. The God who watches over us and guides our trigger-happy hand excuses any and all slaughter committed in His Holy Name. He wouldn’t have endorsed that song about how He blesses us were the opposite the case.

I’ve been pretty hard on the Obama campaign, and still am; but if anything would soften my view, it’s this bullshit furor over Jeremiah Wright. If you are white and don’t listen to black talk radio, now would be a good time to start. Wright’s opinions are not deemed crazy there, and you’ll hear much stronger denunciations of imperialism and racism than you ever will on a white liberal’s show. Sure, some dementia is present: this is America, after all. But contrast the opinions exchanged between African-Americans to those expressed on the corporate kabuki programs, or worse, white reactionary broadcasts. Which do you think is closer to what’s actually going on?

43. rif - 16 March 2008

30 Let them jump. It’s not like they know how to do anything useful.

44. Madman in the Marketplace - 16 March 2008

Spitzer’s Trysts: Stop Over-Thinking This

Oh yes, let’s convene a panel of experts for that. Let me help you: because he wants to get his nut off! Stop with all the analysis! It never ends, I hear all these people talking about how powerful people think they can get away with anything, so it’s a thrill, or that it’s for this psychological reason or this one — please, he wanted to CUM WITH SOMEONE! Stop overthinking this: people need sex, and married people generally aren’t getting it. Studies show (OK, I’m making that up, but it’s true nonetheless) that people married 20 years only have sex on Valentine’s Day, their anniversary, and their birthdays. You can hate me as the messenger, but it’s true — how can anyone be expected to still want to score with someone you’ve been having sex with for a score? Mr. Spitzer simply wanted what humans desire, to feel that sensational sensation when you’re hot for someone, to touch and hug and bump and grind — this is really not that complicated! If you’re ascribing more to it than that, it’s probably really more about your own fear that your spouse wants to do the same thing.

45. marisacat - 16 March 2008

An economic populist like William O. Douglas, the former New Deal crusader who served on the court from 1939 to 1975, once unapologetically announced that he was “ready to bend the law in favor of the environment and against the corporations.”

well imo – tho it can conceivably happen again – we will not be getting a Justice Douglas again, not any time soon. Nor any of the landmark legislation of the 60s and 70s.

CA legalised interracial marriage in ‘48, thru the State SC, not thru waiting for the will of the people. We won’t be getting anything like the Warren court (warren a former governor of CA), not for decades.

we are so stuck.

46. marisacat - 16 March 2008

Have a laugh 2

a kind person popped me this… Wright erased from Obama site. With screen captures.

Looks like Wright was removed from a Testimonials page under people/faith/someething or other.

47. liberalcatnip - 16 March 2008

Housing group challenges Fed’s Bear Stearns deal

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – A housing and fair lending activist group has challenged the legality of the Federal Reserve’s quick approval of financing for Bear Stearns (BSC.N: Quote, Profile, Research) via JPMorgan Chase (JPM.N: Quote, Profile, Research), questioning the Fed’s authority to approve the deal because it involves a non-bank institution.

Inner City Press Community on the Move, in a complaint filed with the Fed late Saturday, called the central bank’s brokering of the deal “entirely illegal” and anticompetitive, and questioned whether sufficient Fed members had voted for it.

In a first step toward challenging the bailout, Inner City Press questioned the legality of the Fed approving the deal without public notice, on the grounds Bear Stearns “is not a banking holding company and does not own a bank.”
[...]
Matthew Lee, executive director of Inner City Press, vowed to take all needed legal actions against the deal.

“The Fed has hit a new low with this, they did nothing to protect consumers from predatory lending and now their response is to bail out one of the most notorious enablers of predatory lending with no benefit to struggling consumers,” said Lee.

“This should be taken as far as it can go to finally bring the Federal Reserve to account that they work for the public interest and not only Wall Street, particularly in a time of crisis,” he told Reuters on Sunday.

48. liberalcatnip - 16 March 2008

More…

The Fed approved the deal between JPMorgan and Bear Stearns under Depression-era laws allowing it to do so under “unusual and exigent circumstances.” This provision, however, requires an affirmative vote of not less than 5 members of the board.

At present, there are only five members on the board with two vacancies, but only four approved the measure because governor Frederic Mishkin was not present, according to the Federal Reserve.

But current law mandates that no less than five members can vote on the matter and states that members can be contacted through any electronic means, including by telephone and e-mail.

“There has been no showing that, given technology in 2008 (as opposed to the 1930s when this language was enacted), the required attempts to contact Gov. Mishkin were made,” Lee wrote in the complaint.

I suspect the Feds will manufacture some sort of record to “prove” Mishkin voted.

49. melvin - 16 March 2008

William O. Douglas – Yakima’s greatest son! The Yakima Valley Museum has an extensive exhibit on Douglas. It is amusing to watch tourists from far away when they wander into it and are astonished that he came from here.

50. liberalcatnip - 16 March 2008
51. Madman in the Marketplace - 16 March 2008

Boing Boing has a link-heavy post with reports about Tibet, both from there and from China.

Some of the posts about Chinese reactions to the protest are really, really depressing. It’s a wonder the human race hasn’t wiped itself out years ago.

Oh, and this little tidbit, which I had missed in the endless streams of objectionable shit that Bush does:

* George Bush removed China from a human rights blacklist just three days before the bloodshed in Lhasa.

A Boing Boing reader writes them:

I am visiting Beijing on business, and staying at a hotel that caters to Westerners. There have been reports that China was loosening controls on the media ahead of the Olympic games, in order to give visitors the impression that the media is unrestricted, but that is not the case in the last day.

While watching CNN in my hotel room, the station goes dark during the top-of-the-hour news flash on the riots, then returns when the synopsis of “what’s to come” is given about other stories, and then goes dark again while the coverage switches to Lhasa.

Coverage returns with the anchor asking users to send in their first-hand reports to ireport.com, after all mention of the incident is over. Same results for BBC as well.

The China Daily newspaper I grabbed from the lounge has a small article on the bottom of the front page, titled “Dalai Lama behind sabotage”, and states that his “clique” has “organized, premeditated, and masterminded” the beatings, looting, and arson, which “has aroused the indignation of, and is strongly condemned by, the people of all ethnic groups in Tibet.”

52. liberalcatnip - 16 March 2008

‘Fox News Sunday’ prods Obama on no-show

WASHINGTON – Hoping to prod Barack Obama into appearing on its show, “Fox News Sunday” launched the “Obama Watch,” a weekly update on the number of days the Democratic presidential candidate has failed to appear on the program.

Host Chris Wallace said Sunday that Obama promised him in March 2006 that he would appear, but the Illinois senator has since demurred.

53. marisacat - 16 March 2008

well… I am for the people of Tibet. Period. Now if that is best served by this rising up, I am all for it.

But let me add, really leery of kindly old Dalai Lama. Cute as a button as he may be (we see a lot f him here) He is far far too close to Dianne F and husband Blum. We heart the old DL as he is Anti Commie.

So here’s to ordinary people getting freedom, autonomy and a far far less restrictive life. Less invaded too.

While we waged hideous war in Vietnam (for Freedom! for Democracy!), one of the places in the 50s and 60s that one could follow events (however propagandised) in Tibet was the National Geographic. Awful awful.

54. liberalcatnip - 16 March 2008
55. liberalcatnip - 16 March 2008
56. Madman in the Marketplace - 16 March 2008
57. Arcturus - 16 March 2008

thanks for the NYT Supremes pieces, Madman

here, from the they don’t make ‘em like they used to files, an article in today’s Sac Bee, Judge hopeful for settlement in California prisons overcrowding suit:

In his speech at the University of San Francisco, Henderson said judges such as himself who oversee cases that uncover constitutional violations such as prison health care have to remain “active” and view themselves as “catalysts for change,” even after their cases have been resolved.

“I think it’s one of the most important parts of getting the job done,” Henderson said.

The 74-year-old judge said he plans to hold off on his retirement until he is satisfied that the prison system achieves constitutional compliance.

“I’m not going away,” he said in his speech. “I’m here for the long haul.”

one of a dying breed, or at least unappointable anymore, hanging on now in senior status – his first job out of law school was in Bobby Kennedy’s DoJ . . . the 1st Black attorney working in the deep south in the Civil Rights Division – attorney, perceiving MLK to be in danger, loaning MLK a car cost him his job:

Okay, and that’s why it was only two years. I would have worked longer. I was working on a voting rights case one day, and on this particular day it involved going out into the rural areas and interviewing people. “When did you apply to vote?” “What did you do?” And after a long day of that I was coming back to the A.G. Gaston Motel, this was in Birmingham, and Martin Luther King was also staying there. And just as I was driving into the motel; King was driving out. And we stopped and chatted for a few minutes and he said that he was on the way to Selma. A minister was driving him to Selma because this was right after the incident I described, where the four blacks were beat. And the process that King [was engaged in] — it took six months to a year to get a community ready to really demonstrate and rise up against the patterns. And he was going out there on one of those rallies. He told me that the car he was being driven in had a bad tire and sort of casually asked, “Can we use your car?” So I said, of course. I was finished for the day. So we drove back into the motel, I got out and gave the minister who was driving my keys, and they left. I went in and ate and went to bed. Well, we didn’t know that we were being followed every place; he certainly was. I often was. And I know now from my Freedom of Information Act papers that I was being followed by George Wallace’s minions. So whoever was watching outside assumed that I was driving King instead of giving him the car. So the newspaper the next day had a headline, “High Ranking Government Official” — I was just out of law school but for Southern purposes I became a high ranking government official — who was doing the Kennedys’ bidding by chauffeuring Martin Luther King around. A huge scandal followed and that was the end of my career with the Civil Rights Division. link

take a peek at this “Partial listing of decisions of note” & weep

58. Arcturus - 16 March 2008

oops, I see I missed yet another editing delete – while I’m here, another quote from the SF Chron about that:

“I was shattered,” he recalled. “I felt a failure, just out of law school, my first job.”

59. Madman in the Marketplace - 16 March 2008

Good doc on Showtime this month:

AMERICAN DRUG WAR

60. Madman in the Marketplace - 16 March 2008

The doc I linked to fits in well with that piece you linked, Arcturus.

61. Hair Club for Men - 16 March 2008

Did anybody see the NY Times Week in Review retrospective on Iraq?

The politics of the columnists ranged from the far, far, far right to the far, far right. I think the plain far right was too liberal for them.

62. marisacat - 16 March 2008

the far right is known to be near the center/right.

Which is known to have a passing acquaintance with the center.

And the center is just too singed from the center/left.

And anything else is Troskyite, Commie, Leninist, Maoist or free floating Demon Cat.

LOL as I heard some loon on Fox radio call the dems (if only)

The Demon CAT party.

LOL

63. marisacat - 16 March 2008

LOL I hope Team Obama is not surprised:

Communications director Wolfson also turns around disclosure attack, asks for Obama’s Illinois Senate schedules and tax returns from every year in elected office. “If you want to talk about disclosure, let’s talk about it.”

From a quick look at today’s dueling conf calls, via Halperin’s The Page (rides at the top).

His senate schedules have been a thorn with the media for a long time (as were Kerry’s)…. what a hoot! I read somewhere (think Tapper) that what Obama has released of his [US] senate years tax returns is … 2006 only.

Gotta laugh, may they advance to mutual destruction.

64. marisacat - 16 March 2008

Carl Hiassen on the mess of a do-over and Demoratic and voting messes in general. Very amusing.

And may I say I endorse No 8:

8. After what happened here in 2000, why would the Democratic leadership jeopardize its chances to win back the White House by putting Florida in such a pivotal position?

That would be a good question for Howard Dean, the chairman of the Democratic Party. Another good question for Dean is: When are you going to stop acting like an addled hamster and do something smart?

7. If a new primary is held, how can
I be sure my primary vote would count?

Pack up and move to Pennsylvania, fast.

Just kidding! By now, most Floridians know the election-day drill: For every ballot that doesn’t get counted, another ballot will accidentally be counted twice.

So it pretty much evens out.

65. liberalcatnip - 16 March 2008

Fro m the spinorama files:

Axelrod: A “Major” Reason Wright Didn’t Speak At Obama’s Announcement Was…It Was Too Cold [Byron York]

Top Obama adviser David Axelrod just told reporters that the weather was one of the reasons Rev. Jeremiah Wright did not speak at Obama’s presidential candidacy announcement last year in Springfield, Illinois. When asked on a conference call why Wright did not speak, as had been planned, Axelrod said, “Part of what happened was that it was seven degrees in Springfield that day, and we truncated the program, and that was certainly a major part of the motivation there.”

When a reporter followed up, asking, “So you’re saying that Rev. Wright did not speak because it was too cold?” Axelrod broadened his answer. “That was part of the decision,” he said. “There was no doubt that there was controversy surrounding him, and we didn’t want to make him a target and a distraction on a day when Sen. Obama was going to announce his candidacy.”

Yes, they knew he’d be a “distraction” even back then but Obama let him join the campaign as an advisor anyway – hoping nobody would notice?. Weather? My ass. Like the pastor doesn’t own a warm coat?

66. liberalcatnip - 16 March 2008

Obama’s church accuses media of character assassination

I find it interesting that Obama can come out and “condemn” what his pastor at his church said, fire him from his campaign and yet he gets a free pass for that while it’s “the media” that’s supposedly involved in character assassination. It truly makes my head spin.

67. liberalcatnip - 16 March 2008

There must be discipline!

So are we allowed to talk about the Wright thing (none / 0) (#40)
by BrandingIron on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 03:54:34 PM EST

now? I missed the “Open Thread” and I think that there should be another one because for the very reason that’s stated in that open thread. “For the past week…” there was a moratorium, so conversation has been building up and for there to suddenly be ONE open thread, there’s going to be more than 200 comments wanting to come about. Just saying, and I hope to see another OT that will allow comments.

So far (none / 0) (#45)
by Big Tent Democrat on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:00:02 PM EST

as a community, we are handling the discussion well. If that continues, you’ll have more chances to discuss this issue.

Dad has spoken. That’s the New & Improved Dad, of course.

68. liberalcatnip - 16 March 2008

lol

Michele Obama’s past comment (none / 0) (#84)
by Paladin on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:18:15 PM EST

I wonder if on some level there’s a small connection between these controversial sermons and Michelle Obama’s comment that “hope is making a comeback and, let me tell you, for the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country.”

Remember how that statement created a firestorm? There is a certain undercurrent of “victimness” in these comments. Possible connection? I’m still formulating my own opinion on this, but thought I’d throw that out there.

This is off topic (none / 0) (#92)
by Big Tent Democrat on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:23:32 PM EST

and inaccurate.

Please do not do that again.

[ Parent ]

I do see that it’s OT (none / 0) (#102)
by Paladin on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:30:13 PM EST

And I apologize. Feel free to delete so that it doesn’t veer others off.

69. marisacat - 16 March 2008

LOL I find Wright less interesting than I guess I am supposed to… unless these preacher people actively distinguish themselves otherwise I look at them as brokers. One sort or another. Esp if they are in a ghetto of some sort. supposedly his church is two blocks from fairly extensive projects. I don’t know Chicago otehr than what I read, I have not been there…. Over the past year it was clear, Wright would surface as an issue, there were some references to his rhetoric but little specific. When I heard his pulpit work, my first thought was, he is winding up the faithful. No real problem with it… but I don’t know anything about him… and … well that is about it.

I DO however see in just the few tapes we have been treated to snips from, that, particularly the Jan 13 one (where Bill rode Monica) he sells Obama as Black liberator (not that I see!) or other form of savior, jesus or messiah.

Call me suspicious. I see obama s a politician, and frankly something of a con. Wow big news.

There is really no cacaphony indicating that Obama ever did much for his district. And some indication in the Dallas Observer link I have upthread (comment 23), that he did nothing.

Soem commentary has surfaced that he was rather hands off about organising as well. Just snips here and there.

So tell me Pastor Wright, what up?

70. aemd - 16 March 2008

JP Morgan buys Bears Sterns for $2 a share. Oh, bet investors are pissed.

“JPMorgan Chase & Co. agreed to buy Bear Stearns Cos. for about $2 a share after a run on the company ended 85 years of independence for Wall Street’s fifth- largest securities firm and prompted a bailout by the Federal Reserve.

The central bank will fund as much as $30 billion of Bear Stearns’s “less-liquid assets,” the two companies said in a statement today. The deal values New York-based Bear Stearns, with 14,000 employees, about $270 million, far less than the $4 billion market value on March 14. The stock had fallen 80 percent in the past 12 months.”

Fire sale. Popcorn!

71. cad - 16 March 2008

“If that continues, you’ll have more chances to discuss this issue.”

Picture Steve Martin bowing to Kermit for his tip.

“Oh thank you. Thank you. Thank you…”

72. JJB - 16 March 2008

FREE MONEY, FREE MONEY, FREE MONEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

JPMorgan to buy Bear Stearns for $2 a share
Sides wanted deal done before Asian stock markets open

JPMorgan Chase says it will acquire rival Bear Stearns in a deal valued at $236.2 million, or $2 a share.

It’s a stunning collapse for one of the world’s largest and most venerable investment banks.

JPMorgan Chase says the all-stock deal has received the required approvals from the federal government and the Federal Reserve. Bear Stearns shares closed Friday at $30 a share.

AND THAT’S NOT ALL, FOLKS!!!!!!!!!

Fed drops lending rate a quarter-point
Move leaves it at 3.25 percent; new lending outlet for banks created

The Federal Reserve announced a series of new steps Sunday to help provide relief to a spreading credit crisis that threatens to plunge the economy into recession.

The central bank approved a cut to its lending rate to financial institutions to 3.25 percent from 3.50 percent, effective immediately, and created another lending facility for big investment banks to secure short-term loans.

The steps are “designed to bolster market liquidity and promote orderly market functioning,” the Fed said in a statement. “Liquid well-functioning markets are essential for the promotion of economic growth.”

DON’T PANIC, EVERYBODY! THERE’S STILL PLENTY OF FREE MONEY, FREE MONEY, FREE MONEY!!!!!!!!!!™

In the meantime, please obsess about what some obscure preacher whose church a presidential candidate attends says in his sermons. Sermons are VERY IMPORTANT, almost as important as newspaper editorials. No one has ever been known to tune out during the former, any more than anyone has ever glazed their eyes over the later while paying attention to sports highlights on television. Also, please obsess about what lies between the legs of the various presidential candidates, and be prepared to spend lots of time talking about what color the appendages (if any) are. This country is currently conducting 3 unsuccessful wars (that the MSM is willing to admit to there may actually be more), and the less attention you pay to them and the collapsing economy, the better.

73. marisacat - 16 March 2008

Its a crucifixion. Nothing less.

I read today that Obama opened his rally in Indiana with a prayer, as a bow to the conservatism of the state.

We are so blessed and so healed.

I am just going to veer off into sarcasm.

74. marisacat - 16 March 2008

Well John McCain is doing his bit… he is in IRaq, I think, for the anniversary of his release from the POW Hanoi Hilton.

We are blessed. Hosanna.

75. » The Next Great Depression - By ¡Para Justicia y Libertad! - 16 March 2008

[...] Looks like UK economist is warning that the “world is now close to a 1930s-like Great Depression.” (h/t to MarisaCat) [...]

76. liberalcatnip - 16 March 2008

lol JJB.

77. liberalcatnip - 16 March 2008

The Nikkei is tanking.

Down -514.61

78. NYCO - 16 March 2008

Allegedly Illinois-shaped cornflake for sale on eBay.

LINK

14 bids. Bid now stands at $32.

1) Shoot me now
2) It doesn’t even really look like Illinois
3) How unusual is it really for a cornflake to be shaped like Illinois?

79. marisacat - 16 March 2008

hmmm I would say that Illinois would be the default shape for a cornflake.

8)

80. wilfred - 16 March 2008

Tomorrow is going to be one funky day in the markets. They are already expecting the Fed to cut interest rates Tuesday morning to stem the tide from Monday. It may not do the trick this time, the dam is bursting. Yikes, this could get incredibly ugly.

81. liberalcatnip - 16 March 2008

4) I need to start paying more attention to my food. $$$

82. JJB - 16 March 2008

liberalcatnip, no. 76,

I’m just LOL as my 401K goes down the tubes.

Come on, you [insert loathsome ethnic slur for people of Japanese extraction], THERE’S STILL PLENTY OF FREE MONEY, FREE MONEY, FREE MONEY!!!!!!!!!!™, boost that Nikkei, Boost That Nikkei, BOOST THAT NIKKEI, RAH, RAH, RAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![Forgive me, I've been watching too many basketball games this weekend.]

83. liberalcatnip - 16 March 2008

I wasn’t lol-ing for that! Just the way you wrote it, JJB.

Meanwhile, bloggers are fighting over who’s going to save the economy as president. Even Jeebus couldn’t pull off that miracle – not with so many factors involved.

84. NYCO - 16 March 2008

Oh, I wasn’t aware that Obama or Clinton had even talked about the economy yet.

85. liberalcatnip - 16 March 2008

84. It was somewhere in there between hope, change, and denounce & reject – I think.

86. liberalcatnip - 16 March 2008

And not to worry, McCain’s over in Iraq to push the gov’t into making better,faster oil deals with US corporations while Cheney’s hugging the Saudis – winking and nodding all the way.

87. James - 16 March 2008

Remember Rachel Corrie – hard to believe it’s been five years.

88. melvin - 16 March 2008

I had the old TSP in foreign funds. It was fun to watch it go up, now I am as fucked as anyone else.

78 – That’s nothin. Image of a piece of toast seen on face of the Virgin Mary

89. liberalcatnip - 16 March 2008

Image of a piece of toast seen on face of the Virgin Mary

lol

90. Hair Club for Men - 16 March 2008

Remember Rachel Corrie – hard to believe it’s been five years.

Five years that history will refer to as “The Early Years of America’s Occupation of Iraq.”

91. liberalcatnip - 16 March 2008
92. liberalcatnip - 16 March 2008
93. liberalcatnip - 16 March 2008

Clinton, Obama backers tone down rhetoric – kind of, but not really. And what is this obsession with Clinton’s tax returns? Getting info from Obama has involved an effort similar to extracting a tooth.

Meanwhile – almost 4,000 US soldiers are dead in Iraq (add the rest of the carnage here); the economy is collapsing; people are homeless and don’t have health care; Cheney & McCain made “surprise” visits to Iraq at the same time this weekend (and you know that was definitely pre-planned); oil’s at $110/barrel etc etc etc but the MOST IMPORTANT THING is Clinton’s tax returns. Totally fucked up priorities. And people wonder why people don’t vote for Democrats. Sheesh.

94. marisacat - 17 March 2008

hmm not good news:

According to The Wall Street Journal about a third of BS is owned by its employees, at least some of whom have presumably seen a very healthy chunk of their savings wiped out as BS shares declined from $170 in January ‘07 to $2 today. Looks like they probably won’t be the last big firm to go under in this mess.

95. marisacat - 17 March 2008

hmm here is an interesting tid bit:

But while racial politics have bubbled up from time to time during the contentious Democratic primary, the two historic candidates thus far have had very little to say about a substantive topic that impacts both women and blacks: affirmative action.

Neither Clinton nor Obama (much less John McCain) list affirmative action under the “issues” link on their campaign Web sites, and the subject has gone virtually unexamined during the debates.

The silent streak may snap this fall when candidates are forced to take a side on initiatives to ban preference programs in Arizona, Colorado, Missouri, Nebraska and Oklahoma–but don’t hold your breath, says Walter Benn Michaels, the author of “The Trouble with Diversity,” a trim account of how the ideal of racial diversity obscures a larger problem facing the country: the yawning gap between rich and poor.

96. Hair Club for Men - 17 March 2008

Meanwhile pwogs still can’t spell.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/3/17/72734/9474/896/478105

What kind of music makes you feel invincible to the GOP horde? Early Patty Smith. Oh, I thought you said invisible. This week it’s Clifton Chenier and Ani DiFranco.

That’s “Patti” numnuts, who, btw, still suports Ralph Nader.

97. melvin - 17 March 2008

96 interesting that MB names as one of his favorite blogs Empire Burlesque. mamz long ago got his panties in a wad and banned Chris Floyd on some baloney charge of violating the precious site rules.

Absolutely spot on, from Goat:

The Western US may be the only place in the world where the connection between trees – or more precisely upland forests – and water supply is not recognized. Nobel Peace Prize winner Wangari Maathai’, whose organizations have planted millions of trees in Africa, claimed in an interview with Sierra Magazine that everyone knows that where there are trees there is also water. She was wrong. With a few notable exceptions, the Western US is in denial about the connection.
~~~
The State of California is in the midst of a massive effort to update its water plan to deal with global warming impacts. But here too forest management is not a topic of discussion. Instead there is a push to create more surface storage. Can California’s myopia have something to do with the fact that most of California’s upland forests are owned by Sierra Pacific Industries and other large timber corporations?
~~~
Will westerners wake up to the connection between forests and their water supply? Will the capacity of forest soils to protect stream baseflow become a forest management imperative? And will the West’s giant timber corporations become the heroes of the West’s response to climate change impacts on water supply?

History does not suggest optimistic answers to these questions . . . .

98. Hair Club for Men - 17 March 2008

Re: Jeremiah Wright and Rachel Corrie

Reading discussions about both, I’m beginning to realize just how religious a culture the USA.

It seems to me that the USA sort of has a state church, state worshipping Evangelical Protestantism. Pro Israel right wing Jews and right wing Catholics under Pope Nazi are useful for making it look multicultural but in the end, they’re auxiliaries.

Jeremiah Wright’s “sin” is that he sees religion as anti-state, anti-patriotic. He sees the prophetic tradition of Jeremiah and Amos calling Americans to repentence.

The state church can’t have that.

Rachel Corrie seems to have become some sort of left wing equivalent of a Catholic saint. People keep posting the same few images. It reminds me of some of the older Catholic women in my family with their saints and pictures of Jesus.

My Name is Rachel Corrie becomes an American leftist Oberammergau Passion Play.

And this is what drives right wing Jews batshit. They see the whole “the Jews killed Christ” imagry sneaking in through the back door.

And they see left wing Jews as traitors, Christian converts.

But if we follow Jeremiah Wright’s version of Christianity, there’s no need for them to worry since religion means criticism of the state.

99. Hair Club for Men - 17 March 2008

And in the end it seems to me that the evangelicals are hoping that Jews will eventually convert to Christianity as evangelical state worshipping protestantism becomes the state religion.

The more that right wing Jews become state worshippers, and the more that evengalical Protestantism becomes the state religion, the more they’ll be tempted to convert.

There won’t necessarily have to be a lot of coercian. Evangelical protestantism will just naturally appeal to state worshippers.

100. melvin - 17 March 2008

98 I’ve been thinking about this.

There are a whole bunch of people missing the point here when they posit this equivalence between Wright’s statements from the pulpit and those of Falwell, etc in their assumed role as pundits. Maybe the worst is Rand Rhodes rabbiting on about church and state should never mix, etc., therefore Wright should not comment on public matters. This is simply ridiculous. She would neuter the ability of the religious to criticize the state in any meaningful way. Baby with the bathwater.

She misses the point that there is a great difference between Congress endorsing religious views and someone in a pulpit criticising policy. A power differential for one thing.

If one says that there is something wrong with a pastor criticizing from the pulpit, one is participating in further shutting down civil society, the role of civil life as opposed to the formal legal structures of government. It really is the difference between informing policy and deciding it.

I see this as somehow connected with the horrible road we are already down of making everything a matter of law. Is there no life outside of legal definitions and restraints?

101. Hair Club for Men - 17 March 2008

And the prophet Randi Rhodes said, thus saith the Lord. Thou shalt have no gods before the Democratic Party.

102. JJB - 17 March 2008

DJIA down 158 points in less than 15 minutes of trading.

I would imagine more FREE MONEY!!!!!™ gimmicks will be rolled out today.

103. melvin - 17 March 2008

I am so glad I followed my dad’s advice. He would rather chop off an arm than incur debt.

104. wilfred - 17 March 2008

Dow is now back in the plus column an hour later!

See everything’s ok :)

You’re right JJB, free money gimmicks rolled out yesterday apparently, Bushco has an emergency session on a Sunday to let big biz know they’ll bail them out. The world markets are appalled and skeptical, the boyz club here goes “Way cool dudes!”.

105. marisacat - 17 March 2008

LOL Donna Brazile quite exercised and, I would say, nervous on ABC GMA just now. On Wright and related issues. Her counterpoint was Juan WIlliams.

But it all falls apart (and Donna drops her neutral stance) when she says that Obama is uniquely situated to get us past race.

What a hoot! Do they hear themselves?

And she also said he is running to be Commander in Chief not Preacher in Chief.

Could have fooled me.

106. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008
107. mattes - 17 March 2008

Why is JPMorgan doing so well? Even Blair is on their payroll.

108. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

The drama queen strikes again.

What he should have just written was “I was for Clinton when I thought she could win (because winning is everything) and now I’m against her.”

“I was for an extended primary before I was against it.”

“Casey, Webb, Tester etc = “progressive”. ”

“I like military metaphors ie. “civil war”, “coup”"

That would have summed it all up.

Instead, he goes into a long screed where he can’t even make the case he’s trying to sell ie. that he fully supports Obama. And the deluded commenters who think he is behind Obama call him “brilliant” etc. So in need of a daddy, they are.

Clinton didn’t just vote for the Iraq war and refuse to apologize for it, she voted to give Bush the same authority on Iran.

And if we want to talk about which party is the most grassroots-oriented, it’s no contest. We’ve seen it in the caucuses, we’ve seen it in the netroots, and we saw it in the Iowa county convention this Saturday. The party’s activists are busting their butts for Obama, while Clinton’s campaign is counting on low-information Democratic voters selecting Clinton based on little more than name ID.

But I could deal with all of that, really, if Clinton was headed toward victory. I see this as a long-term movement, and I’ve always expected setbacks along the way. Clinton isn’t the most horrible person in the world. She’s actually quite nice, despite all her flaws, and would make a fine enough president.

If she was winning.

But she’s not, and that’s the rub.

It’s all an illusion. “Progressive”, my ass.

109. marisacat - 17 March 2008

Maybe this is old news, but I slept thru the morning, so missed it.

Clinton and her shrinking band of paranoid holdouts wail and scream about all those evil people who have “turned” on Clinton and are no longer “honest power brokers” or “respectable voices” or whatnot, wearing blinders to reality, talking about silly little “strikes” when in reality, Clinton is planning a far more drastic, destructive and dehabilitating civil war.

I suppose he means “debilitating”.

110. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

dehabilitating

That’s Bush English™.

111. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

Obama plans major race speech tomorrow. Place your order for a fainting couch now.

112. marisacat - 17 March 2008

From Ambinder, full text

Barack Obama plans a major speech tomorrow in Philadelphia on race, Rev. Jeremiah Wright and the future.

An adviser said that Obama wants to contain the Wright story. He worries that the 1960s-to-1980s prism of race is what everyone has read into it, and Obama wants to move the discussion forward.

He is expected to recount, in detail, how he came to know Rev. Wright, how he came to admire Rev. Wright, the history and meaning of the Trinity church, and address the controversial remarks attributed to Wright.

He is also worried that Wright and church will get caricatured unfairly.

Politically, Obama wants lead his defense, believing that surrogates might either inflame the controversy by defending Rev. Wright or describe imprecisely Obama’s view of race relations. (Is he post-racial? Trans-racial?)

Since everyone is paying attention to Obama and race, the basic thought, according to advisers, is why not give a big speech about… Obama and race.

113. marisacat - 17 March 2008

oops sorry catnip, did not see your link before I posted…

114. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

And, just in time for the speechifying, Wright’s church has edited its site. (And no, I don’t agree with that post’s statement that the church is “racist”.)

115. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

Wait – it looks like those edits were made in 2007. Sorry.

116. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

He’s really counting on his speech – refusing to answer media questions on the issue.

117. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008
118. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

MitM, (I think it was you…)

I’m looking for the link that was posted here to the comedic take on the subprime issue (video). Can you post it again, please? Thanks! (cheesecake forthcoming)

119. marisacat - 17 March 2008

hmm Obama interview on The News Hour, with Ifill. Comes on here in about 30 mins.

Ben Smith has excerpts and link to the transcript.

120. marisacat - 17 March 2008

looking around, and I try to go places that don’t get bots or paid stroturf (hard to find anymore)… threads have absolutely degenerated.

Have no idea about Dkos, cannot face it, have not for montsh but for the odd link or emailed thing.

gah.

121. marisacat - 17 March 2008

think HCfM mentioned yesterday how ludicrous was the NYT weekend article on The War. CLutch of righties all togetehr.

FAIR has an article up on the mess of it all.

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3317

122. marisacat - 17 March 2008

Here is a tidbit. Obama went to the 2002 Black Caucus weekend to drum up support for his ‘04 run and came back very disillusioned with what he found. Longish quote from Wright, apparently they discussed the CBC weekend post event.

123. cad - 17 March 2008

“and fomenting civil war, and she doesn’t care”

Kos is fomenting at the mouth.

And suddenly, he wants to write off a chunk of his readership as inside-beltway types. He is such a small little boy.

But feel the love pouring from his loyal kos kidz!

124. marisacat - 17 March 2008

Honestly I think the race so far has been terrible. All about them, two egos with thin resumes.

Couple of thin underweight animals. Well ti is what it is.

People seem to love it, want to invest in it. The money is so big now we will never get free… Large factions of the party will do anything to put either in.

Nancy has come as close to endorsing Obamalamb as is possible. And kos takes his cues from that end of the party, at least by now.

Good luck.

125. bayprairie - 17 March 2008

great link upthread to “the black american divide” by angela winters.

its important we be aware of the romance novelist viewpoint.

;)

126. marisacat - 17 March 2008

LOL From the Black America divide link

Geez, you know I’m a Chicago girl down for Barry till the end, but the brother is already liberal enough to keep me awake at night.

What a hoot! And I think he is another strategising centrist who won’t do much but feather the Obama nest. And front for war.

127. Madman in the Marketplace - 17 March 2008

118 – Catnip

I don’t remember what it was or where I got it, or even if it was me!

Sorry!

128. Madman in the Marketplace - 17 March 2008

CONfidence

It was plain from the outset that the massive inflation in the housing market was an artificial phenomenon. Material costs had not increased. Building methods weren’t more complex. Labor rates in the trades were high, but stable. Fuel costs were rising, but contained until much more recently. Hell, houses were built cheaper and cheaper all the time. There was not one material reason why a houses sale price should jump 50, 60, 100% in a year. Plenty of building was going on. Stock was on the increase, not the decrease. There were hundreds of home builders and dozens of major Realtors operating nationally. Shouldn’t all that competition have exerted downward pressure on prices?

Well, what drove it all up was the easy-credit ponzi scheme, and with the phony, assetized debts of all those paper-and-pony mortgages, the same folks doing the dodgy lending reaped a second windfall in financing huge institutional sales of equally phony investments, and they all bought each other’s crap and made a ton of money and now, taxpayers, you poor suckers, you’re going to bail them out. But don’t worry, because Barack Obama is going to fix Social Security.

129. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

My latest: The Delusion revolution.

Winters is a romance writer? Who knew? ;)

130. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

I don’t remember what it was or where I got it, or even if it was me!

No problem, MitM. I’ll track it down.

131. Madman in the Marketplace - 17 March 2008

Coming this Friday:

BILL MOYERS JOURNAL | Body of War | PBS

Bill Moyers interviews former talk show host Phil Donahue and Ellen Spiro on the true cost of war and their documentary, Body of War, depicting the moving story of one veteran dealing with the aftermath of war.

With extensive excerpts from the film, the filmmakers talk about Iraq war veteran Tomas Young, who was shot and paralyzed less than a week into his tour of duty. Three years in the making, Body of War tells the poignant tale of the young man’s journey from joining the service after 9/11 to fight in Afghanistan, to living with devastating wounds after being deployed to Iraq instead.

132. Madman in the Marketplace - 17 March 2008
133. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

From IOZ:

Material costs had not increased.

Not exactly true. The softwood lumber dispute was one of the factors that led to increased prices.

134. Madman in the Marketplace - 17 March 2008

NEW REPORT: ABU GHRAIB PRISONERS PACKED IN ICE WATER-FILLED GARBAGE CANS AND SENT INTO SHOCK, MILITARY POLICE SAY

Muslim prisoners held in Iraq’s Abu Ghraib prison were submerged in water-filled garbage cans with ice or put naked under cold showers in near-freezing rooms until they went into shock, Sgt. Javal Davis, who served with the 372nd Military Police Company there, has told a national magazine.

Davis, from the Roselle, N.J., area, said while stationed at the prison he also saw an incinerator with “bones in it” that he believed to be a crematorium and said some prisoners were starved prior to their interrogation.[snip]

In a letter to a friend Harman described “sleep deprivation” used on the prisoners: “They sleep one hour then we yell and wake them—make them stay up for one hour, then sleep one hour—then up etc. This goes on for 72 hours while we fuck with them. Most have been so scared they piss on themselves. Its sad.” On one occasion, she wrote, sandbags soaked in hot sauce were put over the prisoners’ heads.

The CIA agent that interrogated al-Jamadi at the time of his “heart attack” was never charged with a crime but Harman was convicted by court-martial in May, 2005, of conspiracy to maltreat prisoners, dereliction of duty and sentenced to six months in prison, reduced in rank, and given a bad-conduct discharge.

Five other soldiers involved in taking pictures were sentenced to terms of up to ten years in prison. Gourevitch and Morris write, “The only person ranked above staff sergeant to face a court-martial was cleared of criminal wrongdoing.”

Sergeant Javal Davis, describing Abu Ghraib generally, said the prison reminded him of something out of a “Mad Max” movie, explaining, “The encampment they were in when we saw it at first looked like one of those Hitler things, like a concentration camp, almost.” The inside, he said, is “nothing but rubble, blown-up buildings, dogs running all over the place, rabid dogs, burnt remains. The stench was unbearable: urine, feces, body rot. Their (prisoners’) rest rooms was running over. It was just disgusting. You didn’t want to touch anything. Whatever the worst thing that comes to your mind, that was it — the place you would never ever, ever, ever send your worst enemy.”

When a delegation of the International Committee of the Red Cross visited the prison in October, 2003, they were denied full access (contrary to international law) and, The New Yorker said, “what they were permitted to see and hear did not please them: men held naked in bare, lightless cells, paraded naked down the hallways, verbally and physically threatened, and so forth.”

135. Madman in the Marketplace - 17 March 2008

The actual New Yorker article isn’t available on their website. There is a related page w/ some video interviews taken by Errol Morris here

136. Madman in the Marketplace - 17 March 2008

Tomgram: Philip K. Dick Meet George W. Bush

The Decapitation Strike as Global Policy

Minor as that Somali mis-strike might seem, this is not, in fact, a small matter. Think of that strike and the many like it around the world over these last years as reflections of George Bush’s post-9/11 update of globalization. After all, the most basic principle of his Global War on Terror has been the erasure of global boundaries and whatever international agreements about war-making might go with them.

Across the Islamic world, in particular, boundaries simply no longer matter. In fact, in such regions no aspect of sovereignty can now constrain a U.S. president from acting as he pleases in pursuit of whatever he may personally define as American interests.

“Assassinations by air” are, writes David Case in Mother Jones magazine, “a relatively new tactic in warfare.” By the beginning of 2006, however, U.S. Predator drones “bearing Hellfire missiles — the preferred weapon in decapitation [strikes] — had already hit ‘terrorist suspects overseas’ at least 19 times since 9/11.” Such strikes and other similar operations by air, land, and sea have been a crucial follow-on to the Bush administration’s proclamations, immediately after 9/11, that there would be no “safe havens” for terrorists on the planet, nor safety for those countries which housed them, inadvertently or otherwise. Within days of the destruction of the World Trade Center towers, Bush administration officials were already identifying up to 60 countries-cum-targets.

This aspect of the Bush Doctrine, of what the President likes to call staying “on the offensive,” when mixed with a couple of decades of “advances” in air warfare, including the development of sophisticated, missile-armed drones, “smart bombs,” “precision-guided munitions,” and the like, has resulted in a lethal globalizing brew of assassination and destruction. It recognizes neither boundaries, nor sovereignty across much of the planet. With all its “actionable” possibilities, it will surely be with us long after George W. Bush has left office.

137. Madman in the Marketplace - 17 March 2008

Reviving Vietnam War Tactics

In the section titled “A Global Phoenix Program” in his 2004 article, Kilcullen describes the Vietnam Phoenix program as “unfairly maligned” and “highly effective.” Dismissing CIA sponsorship and torture allegations as “popular mythology,” Kilcullen calls Phoenix a misunderstood “civilian aid and development program” that was supported by “pacification” operations to disrupt the Vietcong, whose infrastructure ruled vast swaths of rural South Vietnam. A “global Phoenix program,” he wrote, would provide a starting point for dismantling the worldwide jihadist infrastructure today.

Phoenix was far from an “aid and development” program. To achieve deniability, the CIA trained and transferred operational authority to the South Vietnamese national police, who tortured suspects indiscriminately. CIA officer William Colby, founder of the program, told a Congressional committee in 1971 that the Phoenix operation had killed 20,587 Vietcong suspects in two years. An official Pentagon evaluation in 1968 found that “the truncheon and electric shock method of interrogation were in widespread use, with almost all [US] advisors admitting to have witnessed instances of the use of these methods…[and] ‘turned their backs on them.’ ” A Naval Institute historian later found that “the large majority of South Vietnamese interrogators tortured some or all of the communist prisoners in their care” as well as Vietnamese suspected of collaboration with the Vietcong.

138. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

When I watched the 60 Minutes piece on sleep deprivation last nite, I waited for them to address that technique as a means of torture. Crickets chirped instead.

139. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

How “progressive”:

fuck Nader with a rusty chainsaw (3+ / 3-)

Recommended by:
blogswarm, trashablanca, shadetree mortician
Hidden by:
MarkC, jethropalerobber, sarahnity

President George W. Bush. HIS FAULT.

Dear Democratic Party: Win This One or Just Disband

by Tuffie on Mon Mar 17, 2008 at 12:07:14 PM MDT

Not enough TRs to get hidden.

They’re so full of sweetness and light over there.

140. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

Brrreaking: The Daily News (no link available yet, sorry) says NY’s new governor confessed that he had an affair. Oy vey.

141. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

Paterson affair link.

The thunderous applause was still ringing in his ears when the state’s new governor, David Paterson, told the Daily News that he and his wife had extramarital affairs.

In a stunning revelation, both Paterson, 53, and his wife, Michelle, 46, acknowledged in a joint interview they each had intimate relationships with others during a rocky period in their marriage several years ago.

In the course of several interviews in the past few days, Paterson said he maintained a relationship for two or three years with “a woman other than my wife,” beginning in 1999.

As part of that relationship, Paterson said, he and the other woman sometimes stayed at an upper West Side hotel — the Days Inn at Broadway and W. 94th St.

He said members of his Albany legislative staff often used the same hotel when they visit the city.

“This was a marriage that appeared to be going sour at one point,” Paterson conceded in his first interview Saturday. “But I went to counseling and we decided we wanted to make it work. Michelle is well aware of what went on.”

etc…

142. marisacat - 17 March 2008

Thank You Jesus!

They knew to get it out there, first, in their own words together.

Hosanna for real.

******************

OTOH

I am touring the saner of the conservatives… and the generally lame Democrats.

The Demcrats are quite desperado that Obama get the nom. I say go for it.

The R are being very mthodical about Wright and for Obama’s chances, long term, it is not pretty (merely an observation, nothing more). And they are just getting going, at least on the available for public viewing level.

BTW, more than a few, quite dispassionately, buy-in to what I see, obama likely agnostic or largely disinterested but the church provided a large welcoming and voting congregation.

Does not seem they ever held his feet to the fire either. My guess, Wright was happy to have an up and comer among the congregants. And they tithed pretty generously (think around 22k in the 2006 IRS return)

Seems like any church.

One reason I don’t like them, any of them, but glad when they do whatever “good works” they find time for.

143. Madman in the Marketplace - 17 March 2008

obama likely agnostic or largely disinterested but the church provided a large welcoming and voting congregation.

Joe Scarborough was pushing that idea … something along the lines that “any politician would join the big congregation with 8000 members” or something along those lines.

144. marisacat - 17 March 2008

well it, along with the endless father search, makes sense to me.

Not to agree with Scarborough.

The other thing is the Obama camp seems perplexed (up to and including the afternoon conf calls) and was not at all ready to deal with this coming up.

What universe do they live in.

145. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

What universe do they live in.

Obama seems to believe that if he doesn’t think something is a big deal, it isn’t or shouldn’t be to anyone else either.

Did you catch his interview with Ifill where he said (paraphrasing) that because he’s now involved in DC politics, issues like Wright have to be addressed? I’m not characterizing what he said all that well but it came across as being odd and naive.

146. Hair Club for Men - 17 March 2008

Obama and Jeremiah Wright

http://tinyurl.com/3yvyud

Results 1 – 10 of about 217,000 for obama jeremiah wright

George Bush and Billy Graham

http://tinyurl.com/38zth4

Results 1 – 10 of about 264,000 for george bush billy graham

Billy Graham and anti-semitism

http://tinyurl.com/2mgoey

Results 1 – 10 of about 101,000 for billy graham anti-semitism

What Billy Graham says about Jews.

http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/02/02/Graham_Nixon.html

It’s OK if you’re white.

CHICAGO – (KRT) – Rev. Billy Graham openly voiced a belief that Jews control the American media, calling it a “stranglehold” during a 1972 conversation with President Richard Nixon, according to a tape of the Oval Office meeting released Thursday by the National Archives.

“This stranglehold has got to be broken or the country’s going down the drain,” the nation’s best-known preacher declared as he agreed with a stream of bigoted Nixon comments about Jews and their perceived influence in American life.

“You believe that?” says Nixon after the “stranglehold” comment.

“Yes, sir,” says Graham.

“Oh, boy,” replies Nixon. “So do I. I can’t ever say that but I believe it.”

“No, but if you get elected a second time, then we might be able to do something,” replies Graham.

Later, Graham mentions that he has friends in the media who are Jewish, saying they “swarm around me and are friendly to me.” But, he confides to Nixon, “They don’t know how I really feel about what they’re doing to this country.”

147. Miss Devore - 17 March 2008

I notice pastordamned is posting his preacher expertise vis a vis Wright on the secular kos channel.

Difference between pastordan & pastor Wright:

Wright cursed America

pastordan cursed Marisacat.

148. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

147. And who can forget this greatest hit?

2001-NOV-16: According to MSNBC, Franklin Graham appeared on the NBC Nightly News, commenting on Islam. He allegedly said: “We’re not attacking Islam but Islam has attacked us. The God of Islam is not the same God. He’s not the son of God of the Christian or Judeo-Christian faith. It’s a different God, and I believe it [Islam] is a very evil and wicked religion.”

149. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

Frankly, as an atheist, whether G*d blesses or damns America doesn’t matter one bit to me. Prove G*d exists and then maybe I’ll care.

150. Hair Club for Men - 17 March 2008

Billy Graham = Anti-semite

Franklin Graham = Muslim Hater

I’ve always noticed a lot of simularties between anti-semitism and Muslim hating.

Even more, during the Middle Ages Jewish converts to Christianity were always accused of practicing Judaism in secret.

Hillary Clinton is recycling a very old, anti-semitic slur when she implies Obama is a secret Muslim.

But it’s OK if you’re white.

151. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

Hillary Clinton is recycling a very old, anti-semitic slur when she implies Obama is a secret Muslim.

When did she “imply” that (hint: saying “as far as I know” after repeatedly stating he’s not Muslim doesn’t count).

152. marisacat - 17 March 2008

HA! A lot of people have damned Marisacat. One way or another.

I can say it has made no difference.

Much like intemperate invocations from pulpits.

153. Hair Club for Men - 17 March 2008

When did she “imply” that (hint: saying “as far as I know” after repeatedly stating he’s not Muslim doesn’t count).

When Mr. Benjamin Disraeli says he does not practice Judaism in secret, Mr. Gladstone was quoted as saying, I have no reason not to take his word for it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Disraeli

Of course that never happened. Accusing Jewish converts to Christianity of practicing Judaism in secret was considered bad form by then.

Hillary’s being medieval, not Victorian.

154. marisacat - 17 March 2008

Suspend the collection plate and they’d ALL go into a different business than the God Business. Suspend them being handmaidens to the worst desires fo the political class (war, all too often) and they’d go into a different business.

Good works all too often the cover story. And little more.

It is all about the status and power of leadership. Which after all is Fuhrershaft in antoehr language.

BTW, thsi is interesting,.. I am about 2/3 thru it… TNR dug it up, from the 2000 run Obama made agaisnt Bobby Rush for the congress.

155. rif - 17 March 2008
156. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

I found that subprime video I was looking for.

157. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

Good timing, rif! Thanks. :)

158. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

153. And…umm??

159. marisacat - 17 March 2008

LOL Obama is nothing if not sanctimonious. God it is predictable! That means it remains and is an issue, however people run at it. he constantly hangs nis sanctimony out in the breeze.

One of his implied defences is that no one should ask him anything nor accuse him of anything. That ratchets it all UP.

Geesh get real (meaning Obama).

The righties have a comment he made about Imus (I am trying to find it again, I read it somewhere tonight), about the struggle to raise his daughters in this sort of atmosphere. Ha. They are more likely immersed in every afterschool lesson the Obamas can pay for.

But that comment will be set agaisnt Wright rhetoric.

The oddest thing is that Obama seems to have thought his Jesus rhetoric meant this would nto come up. Amazing.

The old complaint, the Dems are flat footed, tin eared. In another dimension.

160. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008
161. Hair Club for Men - 17 March 2008

153. And…umm??

Benjamin Disraeli was a conservative British Prime Minister in the 19th Century. He was from a Jewish family but was brought up as a Christian. As far as I know, he was never accused by his opponents of practicing Judaism in secret.

In other words, we’ve gone backwards from Victorian England. I can’t believe you’re denying that Hillary is running the Obama is a secret Muslim campaign through her surrogates.

162. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008
163. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

I can’t believe you’re denying that Hillary is running the Obama is a secret Muslim campaign through her surrogates.

And I suppose you have proof of that? (E-mails sent out by now-fired staffers don’t count.) You don’t think the Repubs are perfectly capable of running such a campaign without Hillary’s help?

164. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

And you don’t take Obama’s word for it when he says he doesn’t believe it’s a coordinated Hillary effort?

165. Hair Club for Men - 17 March 2008

And I suppose you have proof of that?

OK you’re denying it. No skin off my back. I don’t support either of them.

You don’t think the Repubs are perfectly capable of running such a campaign without Hillary’s help?

I think it’s coming from both Hillary and the Republicans and is proof at how much growing up Americans have to do.

166. marisacat - 17 March 2008

no at some point, I think Thursday he switched. I caught it in a Q and A…

Now he says that HIllaryland is/was circulating the photo taken in Africa.

LOL.

167. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

Time has the Ifill/Obama interview transcript.

Here’s the part I found odd:

SEN. OBAMA: Well, no, look, all of us have people in our lives who we meet, we get to know, in some cases form friendships with, who end up getting themselves into trouble or say things that we don’t agree with. And probably what’s true is because I haven’t been in Washington as long as Senator Clinton or others that I have not distanced myself from these people for as long a period of time as somebody more steeped in Washington politics might have.

He was a state senator. Apparently, he had no problem keeping relationships with controversial people like Rezko and Wright then. Didn’t the people of Illinois care? Or did they just not know?

168. Hair Club for Men - 17 March 2008

In the end, if this kills Obama’s campaign, Hillary gets beat by McCain. McCain gets to deal with the recession. And Obama waltzes into the White House in 2012, beating the 77 year old McCain in a landslide. And the Clintons are out of public life for good.

169. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

Now he says that HIllaryland is/was circulating the photo taken in Africa.

I missed that then. Whatever works at the moment, I guess.

And yes, HcfM, I do (often) deny things that aren’t proven – like the existence of G*d, for example.

170. Hair Club for Men - 17 March 2008

And yes, HcfM, I do (often) deny things that aren’t proven – like the existence of G*d, for example

That means you would have denied Cointelpro in 1969.

Once again, I’m not voting for either, but I DO think what Hillary’s doing is poisoning race relations in America for her own ambition.

And perhaps an even worse thing she’s done has been to pit blacks against Hispanics.

171. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

You’re right, at least according to the latest Rasmussen poll that both Dems are losing out to McCain because of this Wright controversy. And whose fault is that?

And Obama waltzes into the White House in 2012

I don’t have a crystal ball but I don’t see that happening.

172. marisacat - 17 March 2008

Oh i don’t think this kills the Obama run. The Dems are committed to elevating him, as I see it. Enough of them.

And the R have fresh meat to roast, which is what they do.

173. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

That means you would have denied Cointelpro in 1969.

The fact that I was 10 then might have something to do with my not even knowing about it at the time.

perhaps an even worse thing she’s done has been to pit blacks against Hispanics.

They were pitted against each other long before Hillary announced her nomination.

174. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

Oh i don’t think this kills the Obama run. The Dems are committed to elevating him, as I see it. Enough of them.

He exploded onto the national scene because of his 2004 convention speech. There may just be another orator waiting behind the scenes to steal his thunder.

175. Hair Club for Men - 17 March 2008

The fact that I was 10 then might have something to do with my not even knowing about it at the time.

Copout.

They were pitted against each other long before Hillary announced her nomination.

So were the Sunnis and Shia in Iraq before the USA invaded. You need something there to exploit.

176. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

HcfM,

The Sunnis and Shias? Wtf does that have to do with Hillary Clinton?

And, you will note above that I wrote that I “often” deny blah blah blah. I do have suspicions about some things but if I’m either going to believe in them or write about them, I need something more than innuendo – which is all I see in this Hillary/secret Muslim stuff that you’re pushing and which you can’t provide any backing for.

177. Hair Club for Men - 17 March 2008

The Sunnis and Shias? Wtf does that have to do with Hillary Clinton?

I thought the point was pretty obvious. You excused Hillary’s playing off racial tensions between blacks and hispanics by arguing that they preexised her campaign, and I just gave an example of how common “divide and conquer” is.

which is all I see in this Hillary/secret Muslim stuff that you’re pushing and which you can’t provide any backing for.

Bob Kerry is a Democrat connected to the Hillary campaign, not a Republican.

If you want to contribute to the atmosphere of “put your shit out there but leave yourself room to deny” be my guest. But, as I said, I find this process more insidious than anything about Hillary, Obama or McCain.

Remember, I couldn’t “prove” that Bush was behind the Swift Boat attacks in 2004 either. But that’s the way politics works now.

I’m not going to excuse Obama for throwing Wright under the bus. But I’m not going to excuse Hillary for exploiting racial and religious tensions either.

As I said, I’m not voting for either.

178. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

Hmm…it seems I’ve been signed up to the Liberal party’s mailing list. I’ll have to fix that right quick!

179. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

You excused Hillary’s playing off racial tensions between blacks and hispanics by arguing that they preexised her campaign, and I just gave an example of how common “divide and conquer” is.

Well, just how did she pit those groups against each other any more than they already were?

Bob Kerry is a Democrat connected to the Hillary campaign, not a Republican.

Google what he said for me and post it. (I’m tired here).

But, as I said, I find this process more insidious than anything about Hillary, Obama or McCain.

Which is exactly what I wrote about on my blog earlier today. It’s all obscene – from all sides.

As I said, I’m not voting for either.

I certainly don’t blame you. They’re both the same and neither if “progressive” (whatever that means today – the definition seems to be ever-changing on the BBBs).

180. Hair Club for Men - 17 March 2008

Google what he said for me and post it. (I’m tired here).

Something about Obama attending a “secular Madrassa.” That’s a bit like a Christian Yeshiva.

Which is exactly what I wrote about on my blog earlier today. It’s all obscene – from all sides.

What I find ironic is that for all the hand wringing about Ron Paul being a crypto Nazi it’s the Clintons who wound up racializing the campaign.

And if you saw that NY Times editorial retrospective on the war, you’ll realize how badly not having a genuinely anti-war candidate hurts the discourse.

181. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

I didn’t know there was such a thing as a Christian Yeshiva – not that I know much about yeshivas. And what’s wrong with saying that Obama went to secular madrassa? Doesn’t “madrassa” mean “school” and doesn’t “secular” mean “secular” ie. non-religious? If that’s all that Kerrey said, I’m not sure what the issue is. (?)

I don’t have to read those NYT editorials to know how much damage is done by not having a real antiwar candidate. As I wrote at my place, Justin Raimondo (of all people) now calls Obama an “antiwar candidate”. I don’t know what he’s smoking.

182. marisacat - 17 March 2008

What I find ironic is that for all the hand wringing about Ron Paul being a crypto Nazi it’s the Clintons who wound up racializing the campaign.

honestly I have to laugh. Tough as they are, and they are tough, Obama wants us to believe he came up thru Chicago politics. No… no race/racial/racist games there.

And yet, over and over the agrieved bambi in the woods.

We enter day 5, 6 of Wright, writ large after circling for a year – and obama is still flapping about.

183. Hair Club for Men - 17 March 2008

As I wrote at my place, Justin Raimondo (of all people) now calls Obama an “antiwar candidate”. I don’t know what he’s smoking.

Raimondo likes anybody he perceives the Israel lobby as hating. The Israel lobby likes Obama a bit less than Hillary or McStain. That’s about it.

And what’s wrong with saying that Obama went to secular madrassa?

I went to a secular Madrassa I guess then.

184. bayprairie - 17 March 2008

Former senator claims Obama attended a ’secular madrassa’

Kerrey also recently referred to Obama using his middle name, Hussein, and his former Muslim ties and denied on the show that it was done to ’stir up’ discussion of Obama and Islam.

185. Hair Club for Men - 17 March 2008

And I think Raimondo demonstrates the pitfalls of being anti-zionist and a conservative, of seeing Israel as something inherently un American instead of just the ultimate expression of American imperialism. Anti-zionism without a larger critique of American imperialism just becomes conspiratorial and in the end vacuus.

186. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

I went to a secular Madrassa I guess then.

Not me, I went to those damn Catholic schools. Is it any wonder that I left the church when I was 16?

As for the Israel Lobby, Obama’s buddies have been very busy pumping up his creds in the Israeli newspapers with one of his surrogates (I quoted it here form Ha’aretz) saying he has a “perfect record” according to AIPAC. Like I said, I don’t know what Raimondo is smoking.

187. Hair Club for Men - 17 March 2008

Like I said, I don’t know what Raimondo is smoking.

He’s a right wing anti-zionist. He sees American support for Israel as a conspiracy of a small elite group against the larger American public.

The truth is that Americans support Israel, not only because of the Israel Lobby (which of course exists and is powerful and toxic) and not only because of oil and American imperialism (the line Chomsky and most Marxists take) BUT because Israel and America share a common imperialist culture.

Americans aren’t tricked into supporting Israel. They willingingly do it because they willingly see Israel as a little piece of America surrounded by Arabs.

That’s what Raimondo doesn’t get in some ways.

I think Ron Paul had a somewhat radical critique, draw down the USA’s imperial footprint but he never had much of a chance of winning.

So Raimondo’s just fishing around.

188. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

184. Thanks for looking that up, bayprairie. I still don’t see what the big deal is about the word madrassa. And, frankly, I couldn’t care less if Obama was a satanist, for that matter.

I can seen where Kerrey saying “madrassa” and “Hussein” at the same time raised eyebrows.

You know – what America and all democracies need are people who will just say “Fuck this sensitivity and endless spinning crap…if you don’t like me, don’t vote for me. Period, End of story”. But I guess they don’t spend a gazillion dollars thinking they can get away with that kind of blunt honesty.

189. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

Anti-zionism without a larger critique of American imperialism just becomes conspiratorial and in the end vacuus.

Raimondo is anti-imperialist as well.

190. marisacat - 17 March 2008

Oh I think Raimondo is in love. Along with Sully.

This is one to sit out. No matter who goes in, the future is ugly.

191. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

No matter who goes in, the future is ugly.

No doubt about that. There will be no turning of water into wine, no fishies for the masses, no manna falling from heaven. (See? I did learn something in Catholic school.)

192. Hair Club for Men - 17 March 2008

Raimondo is anti-imperialist as well.

But he doesn’t see the “root causes” of imperialism. He doesn’t have a class analysis of imperialism. He see’s it as a network of elite conspiracies. That’s why I used to like him but find him increasingly tedious. He tends to react, to be a ping pong ball. He envisions this powerful lobby of elite interests and just bashes what they’re in favor of and defends what they hate.

So supporting Obama just seems natural for him. A lot of the Israel lobby is racist and white supremacist and Raimondo (man crush raging) gets to defend Obama against it.

193. Hair Club for Men - 17 March 2008

no manna falling from heaven. (See? I did learn something in Catholic school.

How about flocks of birds? Not one of God’s best moments.

Though he had commanded the clouds from above, and opened the doors of heaven, And had rained down manna upon them to eat, and had given them of the corn of heaven. Man did eat angels’ food: he sent them meat to the full. He caused an east wind to blow in the heaven: and by his power he brought in the south wind. He rained flesh also upon them as dust, and feathered fowls like as the sand of the sea: And he let it fall in the midst of their camp, round about their habitations. So they did eat, and were well filled: for he gave them their own desire; They were not estranged from their lust. But while their meat was yet in their mouths, The wrath of God came upon them, and slew the fattest of them, and smote down the chosen men of Israel.

194. Hair Club for Men - 17 March 2008

So the Israelites whine that all they have is manna and God says alright I’ll send you some flocks of birds. Then he gets so pissed wathching them eat the food HE GAVE THEM he decides to go on a smiting spree.

Jehovah was a major league asshole.

195. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

He see’s it as a network of elite conspiracies.

I thought you liked conspiracies! ;) (kidding)

How far off is he if he believes that though? Just look at Bilderburg, Bohemian Grove, the SPP , this “new world order” stuff (not the Illuminati type but what’s been pushed by world leaders for quite a while now) etc.

Anyway, I don;t know what Raimondo’s gig is. He also voted for Nader in 2004 decrying the “liberal intelligentsia that has betrayed the cause of progressive reform” yet now he’s voting for a Dem. Like many libertarians, I think he’s just perpetually confused. (See: Moulitsas, Markos)

196. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

193. Obviously, G*d hates fat people.

had given them of the corn of heaven.

He’d better be sending more down soon considering all of the corn that’s now being used for ethanol. While he’s at it, could he fix global warming too or is that too much to ask?

197. Hair Club for Men - 17 March 2008

Obviously, G*d hates fat people.

Jehovah shows just what a pig he is in that little episode. He’s got the Israelites wandering through the desert for 40 years.

1.) He gets pissed when they ask for water.

2.) He gets pissed when they ask for food.

So he shows Moses how to bring them water, THEN just because Moses fucks up the command a little, he bars him from the promised land.

Then he gives the Israelites food and when he sees them eating it, he changes his mind and decides to kill a bunch of them.

He’s a seriously abusive parent.

198. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

Are you saying that G*d is a Republican?

199. Hair Club for Men - 17 March 2008

Are you saying that G*d is a Republican?

No. He’s voting for Hillary. He’s afraid of what her surrogates might say about him.

200. Hair Club for Men - 17 March 2008

I’ve never understood why people put the asterisk in God.

Are they afraid of being stoned?

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Erthun0Pauc

201. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

pa dum pum :)

202. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

I’ve never understood why people put the asterisk in God.

I just do it to get in good with the k3wl kidz. If I don’t believe in G*d, why would I believe he’d stone me? Does not compute.

203. marisacat - 17 March 2008

new thread

LINK

204. liberalcatnip - 17 March 2008

The peculiar theology of black liberation

I don’t know enough about black liberation theology beyond what I’ve studied about the Rastafari movement so I can’t comment on how accurate that summary may be but, again, I think it exposes the political pitfalls for Obama and his pastor problem.

205. bayprairie - 17 March 2008

spengler?

religious claptrap

206. wu ming - 18 March 2008

i think the asterix in god is an outgrowth of the jewish prohibition of saying YHWH/yahweh or JHVH/jehovah. sort of like muslims writing PHUH (peace be upon him) after the name muhammad, it’s a religious verbal tic. n


Sorry comments are closed for this entry