Laughing Sal at Playland 15 July 2008
Posted by marisacat in 2008 Election, Democrats, Inconvenient Voice of the Voter, Lie Down Fall Down Dems.trackback
Photo from Laughing Squid
Laughing Sal, the San Francisco version, lived at the remnants of an 1890s Playland at the Beach, out at Ocean Beach… A classic wood framed seaside diversion, rather more carnie, probably, by the time I met it, in the 50s. Laughing Sal was displayed in a stand-alone, glass and wood frame case… you dropped in a couple quarters and she rocked and shook with laughter, looming over you…
Frankly, all too reminiscent of politics today………
I have no idea if much of this report at Politico is accurate but there is one part I think is:
Coordination between the Obama campaign and the House and Senate leadership is so weak that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) — who will chair the Democrats’ convention in August — didn’t know of Obama’s decision to move his final-night acceptance speech from the Pepsi Center to Invesco Field until the campaign announced it on a conference call with reporters.
May the oceans rise to greet him.
“…we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment when we began to provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless; this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal; this was the moment when we ended a war and secured our nation and restored our image as the last, best hope on earth.”
hmmm not quite what I see coming……
**********************
Just saw this at the end of the last thread:
Naomi Klein was interviewed on Democracy Now! today by Amy Goodman. The transcript is here
I am sure most of you are aware or have read her book “Shock Doctrine”, which I read just recently: it’s out in paperback now. The book really proposes an interesting alternative narrative to the neoliberal economic thinking of the last 40-45 years. Much of this narrative begins in Latin America (Brazil, Argentina and especially Chile) and is certainly familiar to most Latin Americans. For the LatinAmerican center-left most of those memories are extremely painful.
However, I think there is a tendency in the american left to ignore that historical period and to view it as somehow disjoint or irrelevant to the politics of an a developed capitalist society. Klein does a very good job in her book of dispelling that view.
Back to the interview: There are lots of interesting things in it. Actually I think the written transcript is better. I particularly thought this exchange interesting:
AMY GOODMAN: Naomi Klein, Obama’s Chicago Boys, who are they?
NAOMI KLEIN: Well, one of them is Obama. Obama spent ten years teaching at the University of Chicago Law School, which is a very conservative law school. You know, I wrote a column recently talking about how conservative Obama’s economic roots are, with his ties to the University of Chicago.
His first response to the mortgage crisis, let’s remember, was he was worried about the government taking action to keep people from being evicted from their homes, because that would create moral hazard. And he was not talking about the big companies, the big mortgage lenders; he was talking about individual low-income people being thrown out of their homes. He was worried about moral hazard. That’s a very University of Chicago take on the situation.
The moral hazard Obama was worried about of course was that people should assume responsibility for their bad economic decisions. That “moral hazard” concept is interesting because it is an essential part of the corporate narrative justifying redistritribution of risk onto the poor.
This definition from WIkipedia is pretty good
Moral hazard is the prospect that a party insulated from risk may behave differently from the way it would behave if it were fully exposed to the risk. Moral hazard arises because an individual or institution does not bear the full consequences of its actions, and therefore has a tendency to act less carefully than it otherwise would, leaving another party to bear some responsibility for the consequences of those actions.
Of course what is missing from the corporate narrative is that the entire financial system reeks of moral hazard in favor of the rich.
** close of comment **
Sorry to be late responding to IB’s question about public comment on HHS’s “birth control=abortion” plot. I ended up tacking myself onto the end of the last thread, so I’ll repost here.
The proposal [text in pdf format] that’s linked by Cristina Page at RH Reality Check is still in the planning stage. It appears that someone inside HHS leaked it to the NYT (and possibly to others). So there’s been no announcement of a formal proposal as yet.
But here’s a link to the public feedback page at HHS.
I dare say that HHS is looking a lot harder for this leaker than the White House did when they were playing the Plame Game.
hmmm the woes from lack of [righteous] regulation… Charlie Rose has Gretchen Morgensen of NYT and Allan Sloan from Fortune… the numbers are terrifying. I have to catch it on the re run tomorrow as my mind drifted.
But Indiymac drained one quarter the reserves of the FDIC… and GM mentioned that, as we hear “too big to be allowed to fail” the message is (of course), regional banks, as the joy spreads, will be allowed to fail. No Shit Shirley…………
Joy joy… hmmm as the oceans miraculously recede and the planet cools. Manna falls from his magical fingertips and we fall to the ground, loving him. Yeah right.
Good Luck, Popcorn futures. At least it is food!
They are so pathetic
They’re worried that impeachment would look to partisan, but this won’t?!?!
Sorry, bad dream woke me up, then I read this … {shakes head} …. bad dreams either way.
No point in even bothering w/ stuff like this anymore: An Open Letter to Rep. John Conyers from the Milwaukee Impeachment Committee
Not going to do any good.
Some of the rich, of course, can have no moral hazard because they have no morals.
Back to bed …
Okay, one last laugh:
RFLMAO. Does he even listen to himself?
Despite all that “post racial” blather, quite the adept at being the victim, a victim, somebody’s victim..
And dogdammit but it is OLD.
moiv – thanks for the clarification.
ms_x – thanks for the fruit.
CSTAR – Only water hazards for the rich . . . just to keep things interesting. No need to worry about the average Jack or Jill, when you’re playing at the club.
MCat – it has come to my attention that sauteeing whole garlic cloves in oil before adding popcorn to the pot is not a bad idea at all. Likewise sprinkling brewer’s yeast over the top, when done.
Have a good day, all.
brewer’s yeast is yummy on popcorn.
In other popcorn news, experts recommend tile board adhesive when constructing festival floats.
OT completely: Big tent hazard – raver blindness. . . .
The Nag hs a piece up, with new polling, on race, the racial divide, and divided perception.
This articlein the New Yorker a few years back (um, …. we’re still allowed to read the New Yorker, right. Right?) is a useful read on the concept of moral hazard and its use in the health insurance “debate” (such as it is) in the US.
This statement is true, but I think it is also incomplete. Moral hazard is a narrative construct. It is part of the Milton Friedman/Neoliberal doctrine of individual responsibility, the aim of which is justify a key ingredient part of corporate capitalism in the US (and in other parts of the world, especially the emergent savage capitalism of China). Namely, manipulation of risk and shifting that risk to that part of the population which can least afford it.
Capitalism, if we carefully look at the effects of the neoliberal doctrine in its advanced stages, is ultimately not a system of ownership and pricing of the means of production, but a market in risk and derivatives of risk. In this system, the dominant class is not made up of landowners or owners of businesses, but those who have the connections to manipulate that risk.
best title ever: You, on the other hand, are just the right size to fail
I would also add, the population that is least able to defend against risk manipulation. If one looks at say, water privatization, within ‘structural adjustment’ loan deals handed out like candy to the third world, it’s not just that the people can’t afford the risk, it’s that they have no means to prevent that offloading of risk from happening, which makes them easy targets [save electing former poppy farmers as presidents… where they’re able].
# 11. I used to like Brad DeLong’s blog. Unfortunately, he recently seems to have turned into an outlet for the Obama campaign editing out even farly mild criticisms of Obama. Now some of my best friends are Obama supporters, which makes it tricky for me to navigate socially. However, in DeLong’s case, though I don’t think he makes a living out of it(say a la Dkos, TPM) the blog certainly does add to his professional cachet.* When this whole campaign is done and over, he might end up regretting it.
Take for instance his “Death spiral watch” posting in regard to The Nag‘s NY Times article. He makes this comment
WIthout further information on the methodology, one can’t say anything about whether the sample size is too small.
I think many Obama supporters need to take a slow deep breath and really listen to what Obama is saying and also pay attention to what they’re saying in supporting him. I guess I, along with my wife (who is no Obama supporter either) need to practice that refrain.
* Note d’éclaircissement: I have no personal gripes against anyone using a blog as a means to make a living. So long as it’s all up front.
I don’t pay a lto of attention to polling as I think it is part of chatter. But some of it clearly is going to enter the conversation more intensely… Stuff like Newsweek having Ob up 12 one week then a few weeks later, barely the margin of error (+3) for instance.
One thing i liked about Bornstein who was at LAT now at National Journal, when he wrote on a poll, at least for the online version of LAT, he included everything broken out, full txt of questions, as much information on the sample, information on subgroups.. and so on. As many pages as it took.
NYT has devoted a lot of time to calling out communities by name as racist. I assume Ob makes it thru but it is easy to see what the whine orchestrated by the NYT will be. Racism (of which we have plenty, but any run for the presidency has multiple parts) and the electorate just did nto understand him. Waaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
One reason I want him to win. The whining will be intense. And screwed up. LOL Talk about a ”distraction”.
JibJab on the 2008 campaign. Funny and very clever. Picked up link at HuffyPo.
15 – Well, the argument that the right makes against sex ed, HPV vacination and easy access to birth control is basically another “moral hazard” argument.
Just as much bullshit, too.
On another interesting tip, found this linked at Boing Boing (yes, I know, snotty elitist dilletantes):
He’s running against an xtian winger.
Liddy Dole Proposing Naming AIDS Bill After Jesse Helms
A whole bunch of new stuff up at BAR about Obama, his love of rich white people, corporations and dishonest attacks on black fathers.
#18 Exactly, sex-ed contraception etc., encourages “risky behavior”, so the right-wing ideology says.
As a matter of fact though, Obama may be just as likely to make a similar argument for some kinds of socially supports on sexual behavior (contaception, access to abortion etc) He his definitely on the side of narrowing risk burdens around the individual as opposed to spreading them over a wider social support.
This is not pandering or flip-flopping on his part. I think he has made it clear from the very beginning that is what he believes, and people who have read him carefully (Paul Krugman among others) have been trying to make that point.
As far as reproductive freedom, and access to it, I think he also going desocialize that, throwing it back into the private sector., e.g., your pastor.
21 – exactly, and if people had been listening and reading him more closely, his actions since knocking out Clinton wouldn’t have surprised them.
when Ob said sex was sacred, the jig was up. IMO.
SICK TO DEATH of his lecturing.
Ben & Jerry’s makes ‘Goodbye Yellow Brickle Road’
#20 Quite a document. BTW, Obama is a Chicago boy alright:
Further down the graf:
This should give one pause. Or paws.
I still say he will put up a conservative Latina Catholic. For the court I mean.
The Democrats lay down for Roberts (however they voted, it did nto matter) and make a mockery of the Judiciary hearings for Alito. What a joke.
Feeling daily koshish, I noticed this sentence in a rec’d diary (by one Granny doc)
She’s upset at that? For frikin’ crying out loud, 47% of americans believe God created the universe as it now exists, less than 10000 years ago!! I think Gran mama needs to go out and celebrate.
The best part of the JibJab is when Obama jumps on a unicorn.
Pink unicorn.
where is this quote from?
“…we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment when we began to provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless; this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal; this was the moment when we ended a war and secured our nation and restored our image as the last, best hope on earth.”
thanks
It’s from the speech he gave when he achieved enough Super Delegates to b over the number needed.
If you google the part about the oceans, links will come up.
After “best hope on earth” he turned around and a rainbow shot out of his ass.
I thought that it had happened several times before: The Wedding Crashers: U.S. Jets Have Bombed Five Ceremonies in Afghanistan
Jibjab should have stuck that in the vid…
Well, you know those Muslims and their gay marriages…
oh surely they are arranged marriages between 12 years olds marrying 50 year olds. We MUST bomb. To save the children.
my guess is that it is only time that certain males appear in public, and they take the opportunity to kill them, bystanders being acceptable “collateral”.
Wasn’t there a debate in which Obama suggested just that?
Frankly reading obama, all I see is that we will extend full bore, no dancing around it any more, no playing pattycake with Mushie,, hegemony to Pakistan. Make it another Afghanistan. All in the name of Osama.
maybe, I couldn’t watch those debates after a while. wouldn’t surprise me.
my first thought after the Columbian rescue of Bettencourt and the American mercs was, “okay, what is the REAL story”. Just a small thing about violating the terms of the Geneva Conventions. A trick no doubt learned from us:
Don’t worry, though, it wasn’t planned, but just another one of those bad apples:
LOL Oh it was the Che tshirts…. he must have been so inexperienced and frightened to think he also needed an ICRC t shirt. The power of Che will do it.
I certainly heard a fairly high dollar amt pretty quick, think it was 20 million.
of course, it’s only a bonus for the fascist gov’t to make it more dangerous for REAL ICRC workers to go out into the countryside.
thanks, i read, i googled, i read some more
nice words
but what is the plan for care for the sick (medicare?, single payer?)
good jobs (what’s the plan, personal responsbility?)
and what is the plan “to make” the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal; — sounds a little biblical to my Catholic childhood ears (certainly not through coal and nuclear)
and for ending a war (or just moving soldiers from one country to another and leaving the mercenaries as they are)
and what is the plan to restore our image as the last, best hope on earth (as done with FISA?)
oh, geez
The unicorn hasn’t told him yet.
Does anyone here remember a news story (maybe about a year or so ago?) about a Republican Ohio state legislator who proposed that single women without children should be last in line for health benefits?
I’m trying to confirm if this was an actual story, does anyone know?
Stephanie… yee of little faith. You must ride the rainbow. Somewhere over the rainbow will you find your heart’s desire!
Interesting article in Inside Higher Ed about women in academe, and why they still aren’t becoming “thought leaders” even though they are present in more fields in greater numbers:
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/07/17/women
I can’t help thinking this dynamic has to apply to women’s involvement in party politics as well. Or the netroots, for that matter. Who’s really doing the scut work, and who’s really reaping the opportunities?
NYCO
Just FYI rings no bells with me.
I can certainly see some hide bound nutter in Ohio or PA or MO or the hard core south pulling that scheisse.
You know after the 2004 Great Loss I watched masses of post election panels on C-Span… all very interesting as many truths got told. Democrats were so shaken (not that they changed anything about themselves, they did not) and at one panel in NYC, forget the venue with Jonathan Alter (who managed in his state of shock to be interesting, for once) and Carole SImpson who used to anchor ABC weekend national news (and was really interesting) a very elderly Jewish woman in the audience spoke up, that her fear in America, primary fears for her, were
— that “Christian” was becoming a demanded identity, and
— women were losing rights to autonomy, and to sexual and reproductive freedom.
There has always been a slam against being unmarried in this country… and it surfaces in so many ways. I have lost track of the times I have been referred to [online] as
Lesbian, as well as
Homophobic
We live in a rough and tumble world, but the criticism of women almost always goes FIRST to sexuality.
Yeah I’d not be surprised if some legislator in Ohio (where Rahm and Bill C broke their necks to get a Ohio RIght to Lifer on the ballot and into the US congress in 2006) decided to blame women for not producing something for the state to harvest.
That Carl Davidson guy seems to be the appointed tsk-tsker on several blogs having an unfondness for Obama in common. Saw him on both BAR and SMBIVA yesterday.
Meatless Blabber by any other name, etc… :p Can’t wait to see if he shows up here, too.
Is everybody going insane? Is Obama giving off some pheromones that are causing really strange behavior? Juan Cole today wrote this today
Women swoon? Lithe physcality. Read the entire posting in his blog; I don’t think I’m quoting out of context or misinterpreting his remarks.
Am I going insane and am I only imagining that these comments are real? Frankly that would be the more desirable option.
Link to Juan Cole, the entry that CSTAR refers to, just above…………..
Bow wow is all I can say.
nu thred………………..
LINK
…………. 8) …………………..