jump to navigation

Weekend Open Thread… ;) 4 November 2006

Posted by marisacat in 2006 Mid Terms, Inconvenient Voice of the Voter.
trackback

   Queensland Reef

Awww.  And I so am not taken in by the Neo Culpa, the mea maxima culpas, all in a row, like a crowd of Siamese cats screaming….

What bullshit from Ken Adelman of the “cakewalk” comment:

Kenneth Adelman: “The problem here is not a selling job. The problem is a performance job.… Rumsfeld has said that the war could never be lost in Iraq, it could only be lost in Washington. I don’t think that’s true at all. We’re losing in Iraq.… I’ve worked with [Rumsfeld] three times in my life. I’ve been to each of his houses, in Chicago, Taos, Santa Fe, Santo Domingo, and Las Vegas. I’m very, very fond of him, but I’m crushed by his performance. Did he change, or were we wrong in the past? Or is it that he was never really challenged before? I don’t know. He certainly fooled me.”

I would love to know what Rummy gets up to in LV tho.  And Santo Domingo too, come to think of it… 😉

**************************************************************************

UPDATE, 12:40 pm  – the sun is breaking thru in San Francisco…

Gah.  I have got to learn to pass by the low hanging fruit… 😉  But not just yet…  I managed to get pneumonia last month and laughing really hard, to the point of breathlessness, is painful.  I cannot tear myself away tho:

[I] obviously want to win as many seats as possible, but if I have to choose, I would prefer a moderate gain in the blue areas combined with a shocking success in the red.  Yes, this will leave us with imperiled and scared rabbit Democrats, but it will give hope and momentum to the 50 state strategy and bode better for our Presidential chances in 2008.  

Moreover, what I really want is for the GOP to get over its sickness so it isn’t a life or death matter whether they win elections.  In order for that to happen, they need to gain some moderate strength in the blue areas, not become totally relegated to the south and plains states.  

Long-term, I’d like to see a ruling majority Democratic party with big enough majorities to sustain a lot of more conservative members.  Kind of like how the party was under LBJ.  I’d rather have a progressive majority that involves cross-over Republicans along with Democratic defectors, than one big ideologically pure Democratic Party opposed by one smaller ideologicially insane Republican Party. [snip]

Oh I so want the era of the Boll Weevils back. Or, as I laugh and say, Come Back Senator Shelby!  You’ll like us now!  No reason to leave! AND I am someone who never advocated “abandoning the South”, but to remain engaged, build vote counts… or at least hold a line, register minorities… keep a populist dialogue going.

The Blue Dogs, on the other hand, are less fiercely partisan, and they do not all hail from the South.

They seek to build ideological bridges to the Republican side of the aisle, are known for their independence from the leadership of their own party, and tend to be more pragmatic than partisan. Blue Dogs are closer in purpose to a former coalition of southern Members of the House known as the “Boll Weevils,”

whose heyday was in the early 1980’s. These Members defected as a group from the Democratic party to vote with Congressional Republicans on budgetary and tax bills. However, all Southerners, they were named after the insect that infected and often destroyed cotton crops, so the name “Boll Weevil” had a pejorative implication.

Lordy.  Don’t get so fucking upset over Tauscher and her comments in the NYT a few days ago….  Unless they all missed she is classic Blue Dog.  Just in No California.

I have gone back to what I did in late summer and fall of ’04, as I watched Kerry sink into the great cravasse of the Grand Canyon, day after day… I have Tosca blasting from the player, with Callas and Tito Gobbi. 

Years and years of the ever multiplying echoes of Democrats appeasing, selling out, voting with the Republicans, championing an “overseer wanna be” like Ford, a cheap import like Webb or a mixed bag whatever like Lamont… I really need to hear that knife going in, the one that Tosca plunges into Scarpia.

Oh well.

************************************************************************

UPDATE, 9:00 pm

Taegan Godard ,  Political Wire, has up a late prognostication from Charlie Cook… here are some snips:

With just over 72 hours to go before the polls close, it’s very hard to imagine how the House majority does not turn over, it’s a question of how big this thing will be. … I decided that no matter how big it got, I was not going to say or write a number bigger than 35. … Let’ just say it’s 20-35, but that the possibility of this getting bigger, is very real. I’m just not going to throw any higher numbers out.  […]

hmmm.  Just caught John Dean in Los Angeles with Vidal, at a Progressive Democrats of Los Angeles function… Dean was a lot less interesting then Vidal, who said less than Dean… 😉  But he/Dean did respond to a lot of restlessness in the audience by saying if the Dems get a majority and run safe, don’t stand up, they will be gone in ’08.  Well, he said it, not me…

In Pennsylvania, Rick Santorum is gone. While the margin in Ohio is not nearly as wide, it’s very hard to see how Mike DeWine makes it back either.

The strange ones are Conrad Burns and Lincoln Chafee in Montana and Rhode Island, respectively. Both races are basically even, pretty remarkable considering how dismal their prospects looked just a couple weeks ago. While even is a bad place for a Republican to be going into Election Day in this kind of environment, both have some momentum at this point.

I’ll be sorry if Conrad Burns makes it, I watched the debates and that is one mean, crazy old coot.  Needs to go.

Conversely, George Allen and Jim Talent, are dead even as well, but with no momentum, and that is very, very dangerous under these circumstances. Talent/Republicans have a fabulous field organization in Missouri, if Talent pulls it out, it might be the ground game that does it, but this is very tough for both.

I am far away, but it seemed Talent hit at McCaskill hard.  Over and over.  And I am unsure, despite much chat from Dems and blogs, that the Michael J Fox commercial did a lot for her… FOX News had a tape of him in an interview admitting he had not read the MO bill.  At all.  They ran that tape over and over and over…

And the push back commercial had the actor that played Jeeeeeesus! in the Passion of the Christos.  He spoke in Aramaic in the commercial.  You know that spun a stupid one or two.  Heaven help us.  Talent deserves to lose.

A lot of people thought we were crazy when about ten days or so we moved the Maryland open seat to Toss Up, I am very very comfortable with that move and most recent polling shows that it has narrowed up a great deal. Cardin is still up but not by a lot. Sometimes candidates and campaigns matter, and Steele has outperformed Cardin in both respects.

The bottom line is that it is more possible today than a couple weeks ago that Republicans could hold their losses to just four, or it could end up being the six that seemed more likely to many then. Seven seat gain seems pretty much out, but then again three isn’t very likely either. Republicans would need a lot of breaks to keep losses to four, a 51-49 majority, but it is quite plausible. Some may be very close, but all but Missouri and Montana are east of the Mississippi River, which doesn’t necesarily mean an early evening, but that the story lines of the evening will develop early.

Yes, well… still some Blahhgers out there prattling 6 – 9 seats in the senate.  Have a hankie. 

And link to the Latest Polls page at Real Clear Politics… 😉

**********************************************************************

UPDATE, 1:30 am, Sunday on the Pacific Ocean:

Death penalty for Saddam Hussein

Former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein is sentenced to death by hanging by a Baghdad court.

And…

I went looking as I read in the Cook summary above that things look a tad dicey in MD with Cardin.  And found this… admittedly NRO not a fave publication of mine, but I don’t mind Geraghty too much… I knew Cardin blew off the NAACP, but had not read a report.

A surprising, little-noticed indicator in Maryland
11/02 12:46 AM

So a day or two back, I’m thinking about the Maryland Senate race, and I’m thinking…

It’s a really Democratic state. Huge disadvantage for the GOP, just in registration numbers. And it’s probably the toughest year for a Republican challenger in many years. Steele has run his campaign just about flawlessly, and Cardin’s a mass of gray without much gray matter, but… maybe it just isn’t the year for a Republican Senate pickup in this state.

And then I read this, in the Evans-Novak Political Report:

In Maryland, many blacks are expected to vote for Lt. Gov. Michael Steele (R). This is particularly true after his opponent, Rep. Ben Cardin (D), snubbed the Charles County NAACP by skipping out of their debate last week, which he had been expected to attend. Steele was cheered at the event — very unusual for a Republican — and Cardin was booed when his name was mentioned. [snip]

And the latest MD senate poll at RCP:

Maryland Senate Race SurveyUSA 10/31 – 11/02 694 LV Steele (R) 47% , Cardin (D) 47% Tie

I am far away but it had seemed to me that Mfume never got it together in the primary BUT ALSO that the party wanted to shaft him for playing, or trying to play hardball in summer of 2003 (We won’t be treated like the girlfriend anymore, to paraphrase – and of course he is, and was, right…).  Just a guess at a distance…

If Steele wins, a bad blow for the party.  But they will be partying over 20 House seats and blow it off… 😉

Comments»

1. CSTAR - 4 November 2006

Ave Maria pur&iacutesima.

This sounds as bad Haggard’s excuse. I think that we’ll soon start getting the stories mixed up. Foley, Haggard, Perle, Adelman

2. marisacat - 4 November 2006

It’s true. All a mishmash of a mess.

I am waiting for the French to throw Perle out. They managed to get rid of the actor, forget his name… there was a movie staged inside his brain. They never much liked him and got him on unpaid taxes.

Surely they can expel Perle for something. it gives me great pleasure that Kissinger is essentially barred from France. No petit dejeuner at the Ritz these days.

3. CSTAR - 4 November 2006

C’est le cul-de-sac pour le trou-du-cul

4. CSTAR - 4 November 2006

Wasn’t Perle the one that recently said Rumsfeld didn’t have a large enough canvas to paint on? Why the sudden turnaround in aesthetics?

5. ms_xeno - 4 November 2006

Fashions come and go in art, Mr./Ms. CSTAR. As in all other entertainment fields. Time for the next big thing to get a chance in the galleries, before the patrons get too bored to keepy ponying up for stuff to hang on their walls. Artists are expendable, but the agents and landlords must be fed…

6. JJB - 4 November 2006

Ooooh, I just love this:

I’d like to see a ruling majority Democratic party with big enough majorities to sustain a lot of more conservative members. Kind of like how the party was under LBJ.

It was under LBJ that the great modern Democratic Party coalition put together by Franklin Roosevelt was smashed to pieces. In other words, this person is wishing for a party that in 2-4 years will atomize, and start a long, precipitous decline, which is pretty frightening considering the depths to which it’s sunk in its current incarnation. If this wish comes true, it will be like the Woodrow Wilson years, a few years of power followed by two presidential elections in which the party couldn’t get even 35% of the vote. Are these people so ignorant recent history that they can’t understand the implications of what they write? Yes, I guess that is a rhetorical question.

7. Ezekiel - 5 November 2006

Is the WP?ABC poll an outlier? If not, it’s been a disastrous close for the Dems:

Oct 22: Likely Voters Generic for Congress

D – 55 R – 41

Nov 4: LIkely Voters Generic for Congress

D – 51 R – 45

Ouch. For Dems to have a 50/50 chance to take the House, they will need 52% of the generic vote.

Your cat is looking safer, Marisa.

8. marisacat - 5 November 2006

Ezekiel… I saw that earlier at RealClearPolitics. AND I n oticed that RCP hid it a bit. The day before poll, from a diff source …

Here it is: 16

Race Poll Period Sample Results Spread
Generic Congressional Ballot Newsweek 11/02 – 11/03 838 LV GOP (R) 38% , Dems (D) 54% Dems +16.0%

AND I just read Howie Klein at FDL, promising [well close to a promise] 40 seats in the House and 8 in the senate.

Charlie Cook, who I think does a good job of flogging for both sides to maximise punditry and sell his products (I am not blaming him, it is a business), has a much saner and cooler final take.

hmmm … I could see the House split 218/218… or barely off that.

I just think it is hard out there.

And it is looking like Reynolds will make it, in Upstate NY. I read that Davis hardly bothered. Ugh.

And it will be a blow if Steele makes it over Cardin. I am too far away I have not paid attention to that race… but Cook seems to be holding back on indicating.

5 in the senate will be tops I think. My guess is 4.

9. marisacat - 5 November 2006

LOL Oh yeah.. NOT washing the wok out. Nor quartering the cat… 😉

10. Madman in the Marketplace - 5 November 2006

Some idiot on MSNBC said the foregone conclusion of Saddam’s show trial “partially redeemed” Bush’s “legacy”.

Where do they find these “experts”?

11. marisacat - 5 November 2006

Thanks to Madman, SFGate.com published the text of the Army Times editorial about Rummy…

Time for Rumsfeld to go

“So long as our government requires the backing of an aroused and informed public opinion … it is necessary to tell the hard bruising truth.”

That statement was written by Pulitzer Prize-winning war correspondent Marguerite Higgins more than a half-century ago during the Korean War.

But until recently, the “hard bruising” truth about the Iraq war has been difficult to come by from leaders in Washington. One rosy reassurance after another has been handed down by President Bush, Vice President Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld: “mission accomplished,” the insurgency is “in its last throes,” and “back off,” we know what we’re doing, are a few choice examples.

Military leaders generally toed the line, although a few retired generals eventually spoke out from the safety of the sidelines, inciting criticism equally from anti-war types, who thought they should have spoken out while still in uniform, and pro-war foes, who thought the generals should have kept their critiques behind closed doors. [snip]

12. marisacat - 5 November 2006

Ritter on Iran… from The Nation.

[I] recently returned from a trip to Iran, where over the course of a week I made the journey from the northern suburbs of Tehran to the gates of the Natanz enrichment facility, and in doing so had my eyes opened. The Iran that I witnessed was far removed from the one caricatured in the US media. I left with the frustrating realization that, as had been the case with Iraq, America was stumbling toward a conflict, blinded by the prejudice and fear born of our collective ignorance. [snip]

13. NYCee - 5 November 2006

Interesting bit of histoire on the boll weevils… and your commentary is asture, Marisa. Nice bite of political brunch.

Yeah, the Tauscher thing, so baaaad… yet all those blues, so gooood! Ugh.

Did not know Chafee went up. I have to say I will not be sorry to see him stay. I would trade him for a pack of blue dogs. And totally agree about Burns staying. Fucking crazy, those Montana voters. Thought they might have more sense at this point. I used the exact same word you did, “coot,” to my boyfriend when I saw he was only trailing by 1 point the other day – crazy old coot just says it.

As for the Dean/Vidal bit, I too caught it this morning, but only the last hour. I loved it. Very engaged audience interaction. Very challenging. In fact, I shot off an email to Cspan right afterward asking them to repeat it next weekend, which they often do with booknote shows. Also plan to call them to urge the same. I think I missed most of Gore. Had to laugh at his “we are an unpleasant people” comment. Classic.

14. NYCee - 5 November 2006

I meant astute. Maybe I got “asture” by blending astute with azure, as in blue… dogs… ugh. 😉

15. Madman in the Marketplace - 5 November 2006

there is something about the Rocky Mountains and those big open spaces that makes some ignorant white people completely insane.

16. Madman in the Marketplace - 5 November 2006

The Ritter piece is full of interesting stuff. It’s sad that we insist, in this country that is so in love w/ our communication toys, that we would rather be ignorant of other peoples:

According to the Iranian Constitution, the Supreme Leader has absolute authority over all matters pertaining to national security, including the armed forces, the police and the Revolutionary Guard. Only the Supreme Leader can declare war. In this regard, all aspects of Iran’s nuclear program are controlled by Khamenei, and Ahmadinejad has no bearing on the issue. Curiously, while the Western media have replayed Ahmadinejad’s anti-Israel statements repeatedly, very little attention has been paid to the Supreme Leader’s pronouncement–in the form of a fatwa, or religious edict–that Iran rejects outright the acquisition of nuclear weapons, or to the efforts made by the Supreme Leader in 2003 to reach an accommodation with the United States that offered peace with Israel. While Ahmadinejad plays to the Iranian street with his inflammatory rhetoric, the true authority in Iran has been attempting to navigate a path of moderation.

So much of this is racism … our complete unwillingness to recognize that Iraq and Iran are well-educated, sophisticated cultures, especially in their urban centers, is leading us to imperil the entire stability of the planet.

17. NYCee - 5 November 2006

Hey, Madman…

Well, when I was out there amidst those big spaces and the Rockies (amazing landscape, although I didnt fall in love), I had some truck with the peacefully whacky “thar’s magic crystals in them thar mountains!” crowd, something that will one day transform the world into the enlightened, I was told. (Or at least make crystal vendors some scratch. :-)) Also channelers and tarot readers. I was visiting a very new-aged friend and her new-aged husband in the late 80s and was taken for a few spins in their circle. Hell, when in Boulder… I think she is still in it – the New Age – but it morphs around a bit. She has long since left Boulder. It was a Boulder, CO Rocky Mountain HIGH. Preferrable to whatever theyre high on in most of Montana, it would seem. But much of Colorado, home of Coors and mega Jesus and Salazar shit dems and lots of GOP, also does seem to suffer from that certain “something” you referenced. Find your pockets of ‘sanity’ where you can, like in Boulder, I guess. (My friend is now in Texas –> Austin. Pockets.)

18. Madman in the Marketplace - 5 November 2006

Oh, agreed about Boulder, but head a little north to Longmont or anyplace south (I’m thinking especially Golden) and you see some SCARY stuff. I lived in Grand Junction for a time, and the often dangerous animosity between the “native” white coloradans and invader “hippies” was scary. I was riding my bike to work one afternoon at the mall on the edge of town, and I hear a rumbling engine behind me, with shouts of “go back east hippy … get off the road!” followed by the whistle of a beer bottle flying past my ear.

Oh, and off topic, but a piece over at Man Eegee’s place brought a little tear to my eye:

A wave of humanity is about to descend on the city. There is bound to be violence as the police have continually used brute force to make the protesters ‘stand down’. They are learning, however, that they are fighting against an unbeatable spirit of comunidad y dignidad. Even the AssPress is covering the revolución in typical winger language.
Rickety buses and cars carrying leftists from across Mexico rolled into Oaxaca’s university Saturday to join protesters preparing for a massive march to confront police.

Demonstrators plan to march Sunday from the university to police encampments in the center of the city as part of their five-month protest to oust the state’s governor.

linkage

It’s easy to get on the bandwagon and denounce those marching and rallying as rabble-rousers and uppity “leftists”- but understand that this is a struggle that has been waged for centuries as Mexico has not dealt well with the culture and racism imported to them by the Spanish conquistadors. Native Mexicanos, los indios, are generally treated like mierda by the mestizo majority. The tension that has been building for centuries is crescendoing again, this time in Oaxaca. But I think this gentleman sums it very well:

“We are on maximum alert,” said Guillermo Contreras, a teacher and protest supporter. “We will fight their weapons with our spirit and dignity.”

19. NYCee - 5 November 2006

Will read it. Still have to watch Ritter with Hersh on Cspan. There was also an author on Cspan (name?) interviewed last week or so about Iran – he lived there a lot – and he too put it in a much less hyped context than our one note media tends to do. Lifted and separated the strands. Ahmedinejad was more elected on a platform to help the disenfranchised and underserved working class than to obliterate Israel. And yeah, he is not in charge of defense, anyway. But doing Israel is not really at the top of Iran’s To Do list.

I am no fan of the mullahtocracy, but, I mean, you really do have to be able to put up with a little perennial Death to America and now the signature Ahmadinejad Holocaust denying in the town square. Especially after all that democracy killing/dictator installing by foreign intervention, courtesy of our beloved Ike. And when you and your pal Israel are the biggest instigators/perpetrators of mass murder and foreign occupation in the region.

God, we just cant let those crazy Iranians get nukes! Look what happened when we tried to give the Iraqis democracy!

Sanely and Sincerely,

The U.S.

20. NYCee - 5 November 2006

Preach it, and oooh, PRAY! TELL!

“I am a deceiver and a liar,” Ted Haggard, 50, said in a letter to his church followers, “I am so sorry for the circumstances that have caused shame and embarrassment for all of you.”

“There is a part of my life that is so repulsive and dark and I’ve been warring against it my entire adult life,” Ted Haggard said in a letter.

No, youre just GAY, Ted.

But then, there is no other way to communicate it to the righteous megaflock, is there?

21. marisacat - 5 November 2006

I had just caught a report on the cables that his “problems are life long” he says.

LOL.

Wilfred sent a pic from the website of the escort (think it was published at HuffPo). Pretty clear that Ted just yearned so so much for male muscle.

22. NYCee - 5 November 2006

Marisa:

Arent you talking about that nutty Israelophile/Islamophobe, (or most Arabs are devils! Kill kill kill) – John Malkovich?

Was he barred from France? He got very wild eyed post 911, iirc.

23. NYCee - 5 November 2006

Here is the latest from Riverbend –

Baghdad Burning

When All Else Fails…

… Execute the dictator. It’s that simple. When American troops are being killed by the dozen, when the country you are occupying is threatening to break up into smaller countries, when you have militias and death squads roaming the streets and you’ve put a group of Mullahs in power- execute the dictator.

It ends as follows:

Once again… The timing of all of this is impeccable- two days before congressional elections. And if you don’t see it, then I’m sorry, you’re stupid. Let’s see how many times Bush milks this as a ‘success’ in his coming speeches.

A final note. I just read somewhere that some of the families of dead American soldiers are visiting the Iraqi north to see ‘what their sons and daughters died for’. If that’s the goal of the visit, then, “Ladies and gentlemen- to your right is the Iraqi Ministry of Oil, to your left is the Dawry refinery… Each of you get this, a gift bag containing a 3 by 3 color poster of Al Sayid Muqtada Al Sadr (Long May He Live And Prosper), an Ayatollah Sistani t-shirt and a map of Iran, to scale, redrawn with the Islamic Republic of South Iraq. Also… Hey you! You- the female in the back- is that a lock of hair I see? Cover it up or stay home.”

And that is what they died for.

24. marisacat - 5 November 2006

well she pretty well takes care of it all. George is on live from Topeka… glorying in the verdict, the war and the deep night in the heart land.

He is on to his litany, his ‘call and response’ of what the DemocRATs do and don’t do.

If he is not over the edge, then I am …

25. marisacat - 5 November 2006

New poll on Generic Congress:

Generic Congressional Ballot Pew Research 11/01 – 11/04 LV GOP (R) 43% , Dems (D) 47% Dems +4.0%

LINK to the latest polls at Real Clear Politics.

26. marisacat - 5 November 2006

Billmon on the tightening numbers.

27. bayprairie - 5 November 2006

Find your pockets of ’sanity’ where you can, like in Boulder, I guess. (My friend is now in Texas –> Austin. Pockets.)

this idea of an austin immunity from the texas curse is referred to within my small circle of friends as the “great austin myth”. not understanding it, i assume it’s probably some form of denial used to assuage guilty feelings that arise from non-native’s enjoyment of some aspect of living in texas. variants abound too, austin has no lock on raspy texas bullshit. i’ve personally spent many an enjoyable hour rolling my eyes at the great austin myth’s utter silliness. having been condemned by fate to living my life within the confines of the hell that is texas (childhood summers plus four years in new orleans excepted 😉 i can assure everyone that there is no crystal bubble entrapping the city that renders it magically and completely different from the rest of the state, although the geographically chauvinistic keep insisting otherwise. no, i’m afraid “a texas is a texas is a texas“, as someone once famously said. david crockett perhaps.

i am willing to concede the point that the percentage of ignorant redneck assholes within the confines of the city limits of austin proper is a few percent less than found within the general population of the state as a whole. this isn’t saying austin doesn’t have incredible numbers of ignorant redneck assholes, believe me, they do. the entire state crawls with them. i personally feel the minor improvement the city does enjoy is due almost entirely to to the dilutive effect of a very large student population plus a touch of almost-refreshing outdoor scenery. but i’m afraid i simply can’t buy into this belief that the burg is less insane than any other large urban area that lies within the boundaries of the loon star state.

except for dallas, of course. 😉 those dallas people seem to suffer from that certain “something” mentioned above.

;-P

28. marisacat - 5 November 2006

All I can say is I liked FW* a lot. It seemed older to me than Dallas. And lordy, there were black people on view. Dallas seemed to be hiding them, or keeping them in the kitchens. It got odd frankly.

*- and a bar called Daddy-O’s… 😉

29. Ezekiel - 5 November 2006

Marisa,

Booman wants to dialogue with you.

For the good of the country.

30. CSTAR - 5 November 2006

Talking about white only, how about the picture of haggard’s congregation in the NYTimes.

31. CSTAR - 5 November 2006

Oops somehow link didn’t work Syntax syntax (sin tax?)

32. bayprairie - 6 November 2006

probably a very popular “joint” name, im sure there were dozens…yet it might be the same…

…Then Jeff , Frank, Paula and I went into Fort Worth for a drink on the deck of the Flying Saucer. Paula told us stories of the old days when the bar was called Daddy-o’s and was a bit raunchier and more raucous…

33. bayprairie - 6 November 2006
34. marisacat - 6 November 2006

hmmm that could be it… The back part with the words “Flying Saucer” looks like an old Speakeasy frankly.

But the front part the bigger brick building.. It does look as tho the windows are enlarged. And Daddy-O’s had the whole building… smallish main bar tho which is what we liked. Very low key. A great black bartender in the afternoons. The ladies room was upstairs at the end of a row of rooms off a long hallway. They were all empty at the time we went there… and I got a strong hit of old time brothel. The rooms still had a single closet and small sinks in one corner of the room.. Sort of late Victorian SW boarding house.

It was a great place… low key tho.. a few tables in front of the bar.. they did have saddles on their bar stools..

35. NYCee - 6 November 2006

bayprairie:

No “guilt assuaging” in my friend’s case. She never advertised it as liberal to me. She really isnt political. Song, theater, writing… now kids. She’s liberal in her sensibilities, but extremely tuned out of politics. That was more my perception (something of a music scene, students, eccentrics, street people, etc) although Ive heard the good ole boys waxing loving on Bush from some Austin BBQ joint, so I never thought it wasnt Texas tainted, so to speak.

She lived in an apt in Los Angeles after Boulder for a long time. She had kids, and she and husband were tired of LA, wanted a house and yard for cheaper. Her husband’s sister, also from LA, had moved to Austin and sold her on it, also because it had the potential clientele for voice lessons, which she gives.

I passed thru Texas once, ages ago, on a 72 hour bus ride from deep in the heart of Mexico … to NY. That was it.

36. marisacat - 6 November 2006

LOL ezekiel… thanks for the link – and sorry your comment was delayed, it slipped to moderation, not sure why… regular commenters should be able to embed quite a few links w/o it going to moderation.

Honestly I might have missed it/BMT posting but for someone linking or sending it to me.

Boyz should chill… Or have a beer or whatever it is they do.

But I hve to tour a few other sites first (I have been enjoying Geraghty at National Review… yes Horrors!…) and will finish the Boo thoughts in a bit…

The title tho is a scream. Somehow or other… 😉

Wash Journal is discussing the Pew poll. There is also a Gallop out late last night. Reinforces the WaPo and the Pew. They line up 6, 4 and now 7 from Gallup for Generic Congressional. (I am not a numbers or poll person.. I jsut look for shifts)

Duffy and Walters from Cook Report are on Wahs Journal, dialing back a bit…

I read last night that Gillibrand is way up over Sweeney in upstate NY. All to the good.

37. NYCee - 6 November 2006

From Booman’s diary:

We live in partisan times and we must react accordingly. That means we have to go after people like Joe Lieberman that undermine what little leverage we have. But, at the same time, we do not go after Ben Nelson even though he votes with the President 54% of the time. That’s the difference between Connecticut and Nebraska (not to mention a mediawhore and a quiet Senator). Lieberman and Nelson would be a lot less annoying in a Senate with 67 Democrats.

There it is … again. Ben Nelson: The Quiet Man. And that 54% where he oh-so-quietly goes about his extreme rightwing business is on the most vital issues: war, tax, health, bankruptcy, trade, torture, judiciary, appointees.

Send Ben a thank you note sealed with a kiss.

38. marisacat - 6 November 2006

Oh … here is the answer to Booman and his contra Marisacat post.

I will yearn for and work for national federal majorities for Democrats when they fucking stop voting with and for the Republican agenda.

That combined vote is the dog that wags the little wussy Dems… wags them to death.

I fell asleep yesterday afternoon and woke to the speech by Jean Carnahan at the rally (running Live on CSpan) for McCaskill, who has run a long hard bruising race against Talent. I will say that Obama was off his game (and he already bores me) at the rally….

Carnahan ws giving a very good version of the “rousing, come on home” Speech… and I was reminded of the truly beautiful prose of her concession speech.

But it made me very restless: THEY MUST STOP VOTING WITH THE REPUBLICAN MAJORITY.

It is what Delay taught the Republicans. Line votes. That equals POWER. Even if you lose. You stop being a handmaiden.

Democrats, if they want such as me back, must stop voting with the Republicans. OVer and over. And then they do it again.

And listen up little Blahhger chilluns, I hear that Reid did jack shit for any of the Democrats running in NV. I imagine he helped Hafen – for all that it mattered..

But old news is New News again: Ensign is his bud.

Oh and I saw a long slobber from RedDan in that compilation. Someone who needs an intervention.

39. marisacat - 6 November 2006

LOL… and this.

Amazing how those speeches from 40 and more years ago are still true. If official affiliations have slightly shifted.

Same is true of the anti war words from Martin at the Riverside Church in ’67.

I believe one reason America loves her foreign racist wars, esp the BIg Ones, is that they bleed the nation. They take food from Americans.

And funny.. Democrats seem to love this war as much as Bush and his Neos. Oh yes, ”better managed”.

Silber lobs back that foolishness…

They NEVER fought back. And one of the few strong statements, from Durbin, they ran in fear, coalesced with the Republicans and whammo, McCain gets his apology. I am sure Blahhgers remember that one.

That is the Democrat, they want to be tired middle managers. They promise “competence”.

What lofty goals.

40. christian - 6 November 2006

iran is still ruled by terrible anti-semites and this bizarro clip from an iranian tv special on jewish media manipulation via woody allen is instructive in that this is what passes for cultural discourse.

i’m glad ritter found a better side to iran, but i hope for the people’s sake they get rid of their very ill leaders. bushco would love that war so they could rally the troops.

btw, i heard a caller to laura ingraham’s show complaining about a rude democratic pollster…so the rethug plan of voter manipulation is in place..


Leave a comment